Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Brain Training in Children and Adolescents: Is It Scientifically Valid?

dc.contributor.authorRossignoli-Palomeque, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Hernández, Elena
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Marqués, Javier
dc.contributor.editorDi Giacomo, Dina
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T14:48:33Z
dc.date.available2024-02-05T14:48:33Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-04
dc.description.abstractBackground: Brain training products are becoming increasingly popular for children and adolescents. Despite the marketing aimed at their use in the general population, these products may provide more benefits for specific neurologically impaired populations. A review of Brain Training (BT) products analyzing their efficacy while considering the methodological limitations of supporting research is required for practical applications. Method: searches were made of the PubMed database (until March 2017) for studies including: (1) empirical data on the use of brain training for children or adolescents and any effects on near transfer (NT) and/or far transfer (FT) and/or neuroplasticity, (2) use of brain training for cognitive training purposes, (3) commercially available training applications, (4) computer-based programs for children developed since the 1990s, and (5) relevant printed and peer-reviewed material. Results: Database searches yielded a total of 16,402 references, of which 70 met the inclusion criteria for the review. We classified programs in terms of neuroplasticity, near and far transfer, and long-term effects and their applied methodology. Regarding efficacy, only 10 studies (14.2%) have been found that support neuroplasticity, and the majority of brain training platforms claimed to be based on such concepts without providing any supporting scientific data. Thirty-six studies (51.4%) have shown far transfer (7 of them are non-independent) and only 11 (15.7%) maintained far transfer at follow-up. Considering the methodology, 40 studies (68.2%) were not randomized and controlled; for those randomized, only 9 studies (12.9%) were double-blind, and only 13 studies (18.6%) included active controls in their trials. Conclusion: Overall, few independent studies have found far transfer and long-term effects. The majority of independent results found only near transfer. There is a lack of double-blind randomized trials which include an active control group as well as a passive control to properly control for contaminant variables. Based on our results, Brain Training Programs as commercially available products are not as effective as first expected or as they promise in their advertisements
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Psicología Experimental, Procesos Cognitivos y Logopedia
dc.description.facultyFac. de Psicología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationRossignoli-Palomeque T, Pérez-Hernández E and González-Marqués J. Brain Training in Children and Adolescents: Is It Scientifically Valid? Front. Psychol. 2018 9:565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00565
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00565
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00565/full
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00565
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/99041
dc.journal.titleFrontiers in Psychology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial565
dc.publisherFrontiers
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordCognitive training
dc.subject.keywordbrain training
dc.subject.keywordcomputer-based intervention
dc.subject.keywordchildren
dc.subject.keywordadolescents
dc.subject.ucmCiencias Biomédicas
dc.subject.ucmPsicología (Psicología)
dc.subject.ucmNeuropsicología
dc.subject.ucmPsicología cognitiva
dc.subject.unesco61 Psicología
dc.subject.unesco6102 Psicología del Niño y del Adolescente
dc.subject.unesco6106 Psicología Experimental
dc.subject.unesco6106.01 Actividad Cerebral
dc.subject.unesco6106.07 Procesos Mentales
dc.titleBrain Training in Children and Adolescents: Is It Scientifically Valid?
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number9
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication23f8c731-89eb-4429-9112-0c915d3d1a84
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery23f8c731-89eb-4429-9112-0c915d3d1a84

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
FRONTIERS 2018.pdf
Size:
672.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections