La doctrina Saquetti y el recurso de casación: la idoneidad del recurso de casación en la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa como una revisión jurisdiccional en el procedimiento administrativo sancionador a la luz de la doctrina del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Defense date
15/02/2024
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Citation
Abstract
Este trabajo consiste, en primer lugar, en un análisis de la doctrina Saquetti, creada por el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en su Sentencia del 30 de junio de 2020 (asunto Saquetti) y los requisitos que establece respecto a sanciones administrativas de naturaleza penal y la exigencia del art. 2 del Protocolo n.º 7 del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos, sobre el derecho a un doble grado de jurisdicción en materia pena.
Se analizan a continuación, los posibles conflictos que genera este derecho a un doble grado de jurisdicción con el sistema de recursos en la Jurisdicción Contencioso-Administrativa española. En particular se analiza (1) la disonancia de la clasificación de la naturaleza penal de las sanciones administrativas, (2) la exigencia de una reexamen jurisdiccional en sanciones administrativas y (3) la idoneidad del recurso de casación para satisfacer este derecho.
En base a este análisis, se extraen y exponen las contestaciones a estas preguntas que ofrece el Tribunal Supremo, el Tribunal Constitucional y diversas posiciones doctrinales al respecto.
This paper consists in the analysis of the “Saquetti doctrine”, created by the European Court of Human Rights, in its Sentence of the 30th of June of 2020 (case Saquetti) and the requisites it stablishes on administrative sanctions with a penal nature and the requirements of the Article 2 of the Protocol N. º 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights, on the right of appeal in criminal matters. Following, it will be analysed the possible conflicts that rise between that Doctrine and the right to appeal in criminal matters and the Spanish Administrative Law appealing system. Particularly it’s analysed (1) the dissonance between the Spanish internal qualifications system on Administrative Sanctions and its criminal nature, (2) the requirements of judicial review in Administrative Sanctions and (3) the suitability of the Appeal to the Spanish Supreme Court to fulfil the right to appeal. To answer these questions, the answers given by the Spanish Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court and doctrinal positions on the matter will be analysed.
This paper consists in the analysis of the “Saquetti doctrine”, created by the European Court of Human Rights, in its Sentence of the 30th of June of 2020 (case Saquetti) and the requisites it stablishes on administrative sanctions with a penal nature and the requirements of the Article 2 of the Protocol N. º 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights, on the right of appeal in criminal matters. Following, it will be analysed the possible conflicts that rise between that Doctrine and the right to appeal in criminal matters and the Spanish Administrative Law appealing system. Particularly it’s analysed (1) the dissonance between the Spanish internal qualifications system on Administrative Sanctions and its criminal nature, (2) the requirements of judicial review in Administrative Sanctions and (3) the suitability of the Appeal to the Spanish Supreme Court to fulfil the right to appeal. To answer these questions, the answers given by the Spanish Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court and doctrinal positions on the matter will be analysed.