Gloucester, Gloucestershire, 54 copper alloy denarii and 15322 copper alloy radiates to AD 296

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Full text at PDC

Publication date

2010

Advisors (or tutors)

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Collection Moneta
Citations
Google Scholar

Citation

Abdy, R., Besly, E. & López-Sánchez, F. (2010). Gloucester, Gloucestershire, 54 copper alloy denarii and 15322 copper alloy radiates to AD 296. In R. Abdy, W. Besly & F. López-Sánchez, The Gloucester hoard and other coin hoards of the Britannic Empire. Coin hoards from Roman Britannic XIII. Moneta, Wetteren (Belgium), 21-113.

Abstract

Britain has produced some 600 known hoards terminating with coins of Carausius and Allectus, though there are significant differences between them in terms of the proportions of the ‘British’ (should that now be ‘Britannic’?) usurpers' coins they contain. In their 1988 publication of the contemporary Normanby hoard, Bland and Burnett suggested that this large group could be divided into four categories depending on the relative quantities of Carausian/Allectan coins compared with earlier coins and/or issues of the legitimate emperors Diocletian and Maximian (with an additional fifth category proposed by Besly in his 2006 catalogue and discussion of the Rogiet hoard). The Gloucester hoard counts as a ‘legitimist’ hoard in that it comprises a substantial number of coins struck after the reform of Aurelian in a.d. 274 — termed ‘Aureliani’ to distinguish them from earlier radiates — as well as far more coins of the first Tetrarchy than of the British usurpers (1,453 compared to 34).Unravelling the complexities of late third-century hoarding in Britain was not, however, a priority for the volume's editors, a challenge which will have to await another day. Instead, its virtues lie in presenting new numismatic data, either in the form of new hoards or, in the Gloucester case, in publishing in detail an old but extremely important find, albeit exactly 50 years after its discovery. The main reason for the delay, as noted in the Preface, is because a large proportion of the hoard comprises coins issued after the Aurelianic reform that are relatively rare elsewhere (some extremely so), while the standard numismatic reference for the period has long been obsolete (the fifth volume of Roman Imperial Coinage was published in two parts in 1927 and 1933). Fortunately, the publication of both the La Venèra hoard by Estiot and, subsequently, the Rogiet hoard by Besly ensured that by 2006 the state of numismatic knowledge had developed sufficiently to facilitate the production of an up-to-date catalogue of the Gloucester hoard.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Hitherto the late third century was often perceived as one of decline after the grandeur of earlier times, yet the improved knowledge of the coinage of Carausius and Allectus has shown that there is more to this period than simple degeneration. Much is still uncertain, however, about Britain on the eve of the final century of Roman occupation and about the causes of the apparent upsurge in coin hoarding during and after the Britannic Empire. While this publication of eight other coin hoards of the a.d. 290s does not deal with this specific issue, it does provide the numismatic tools with which we might begin to unravel the problems. This volume will be an important resource for anyone interested in this intriguing period of British (and Roman) history. Time will tell if it leads to a more sophisticated appreciation of hoarding at the turn of the third and fourth centuries, although given the potentially catastrophic changes currently being wrought in Britain's museums, it may well come to be celebrated as one of the last pieces of collaborative numismatic research of its meticulous kind.

UCM subjects

Unesco subjects

Keywords