Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Biomic Specialization and Speciation Rates in Ruminants (Cetartiodactyla, Mammalia): A Test of the Resource-Use Hypothesis at the Global Scale

dc.contributor.authorLópez Cantalapiedra, Juan
dc.contributor.authorHernández Fernández, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T00:12:38Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T00:12:38Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractThe resource-use hypothesis proposed by E.S. Vrba predicts that specialist species have higher speciation and extinction rates than generalists because they are more susceptible to environmental changes and vicariance. In this work, we test some of the predictions derived from this hypothesis on the 197 extant and recently extinct species of Ruminantia (Cetartiodactyla, Mammalia) using the biomic specialization index (BSI) of each species, which is based on its distribution within different biomes. We ran 10000 Monte Carlo simulations of our data in order to get a null distribution of BSI values against which to contrast the observed data. Additionally, we drew on a supertree of the ruminants and a phylogenetic likelihood-based method (QuaSSE) for testing whether the degree of biomic specialization affects speciation rates in ruminant lineages. Our results are consistent with the predictions of the resource-use hypothesis, which foretells a higher speciation rate of lineages restricted to a single biome (BSI = 1) and higher frequency of specialist species in biomes that underwent high degree of contraction and fragmentation during climatic cycles. Bovids and deer present differential specialization across biomes; cervids show higher specialization in biomes with a marked hydric seasonality (tropical deciduous woodlands and schlerophyllous woodlands), while bovids present higher specialization in a greater variety of biomes. This might be the result of divergent physiological constraints as well as a different biogeographic and evolutionary history.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Geológicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/15581
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0028749
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://www.plosone.org/static/information.action
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/42202
dc.issue.number12
dc.journal.titlePlos one
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final10
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu569
dc.subject.keywordRimiants
dc.subject.keywordMammalia
dc.subject.ucmPaleontología
dc.subject.unesco2416 Paleontología
dc.titleBiomic Specialization and Speciation Rates in Ruminants (Cetartiodactyla, Mammalia): A Test of the Resource-Use Hypothesis at the Global Scale
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number6
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd7d8897f-0be5-4679-a9a1-87e0ef379cc1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd7d8897f-0be5-4679-a9a1-87e0ef379cc1

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0028749.pdf
Size:
365.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections