Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Comparing the desalination performance of SMM blended polyethersulfone to SMM blended polyetherimide membranes by direct contact membrane distillation

dc.contributor.authorKhayet Souhaimi, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorQtaishat, M.
dc.contributor.authorMatsuura, T.
dc.contributor.authorKhulbe, K. C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T03:43:16Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T03:43:16Z
dc.date.issued2009-05
dc.descriptionEuroMedLab Conference (2008. Dead Sea, Jordan)
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to compare the effect of host hydrophilic polymer on novel hydrophobic/hydrophilic composite membrane characteristics and desalination performance by direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD). Two different polymers are used for the host polymer: polyethersulfone (PES) and polyetherimide (PEI). The membranes were prepared by the phase inversion method by blending surface modifying macromolecules (SMM) into the host hydrophilic polymer (PES and PEI). The membranes were characterized using a wide variety of characterization techniques including the gas permeation test, measurement of the liquid entry pressure of water (LEPw), scanning electronic microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and contact angle measurement. Furthermore, the membranes were tested by DCMD for desalination of 0.5 M NaCl solution and the results were compared to commercial polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes (FGLP 1425, Millipore). The effects of the type of host polymer oil membrane morphology and characteristics were identified, which enabled us to link membrane morphology to membrane performance. The PES membrane yielded Superior flux to that of the commercial membrane and the PEI membrane when their performance was compared. This result could be attributed to the fact that the nSMM/PES had a higher pore size/porosity ratio and lower LEPw than the nSMM/PEI membrane. It is worth mentioning that all prepared membranes were tested successfully for the desalination application. hi other words, NaCl concentrations in the permeate were below 200 ppm.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Estructura de la Materia, Física Térmica y Electrónica
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Físicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/26390
dc.identifier.doi10.5004/dwt.2009.584
dc.identifier.issn1944-3994
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.584
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/44316
dc.issue.number01-mar
dc.journal.titleDesalination and water treatment
dc.page.final98
dc.page.initial91
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc
dc.rights.accessRightsmetadata only access
dc.subject.cdu536
dc.subject.keywordHydrophobic/Hydrophilic Composite Membranes
dc.subject.keywordAtomic-Force Microscopy
dc.subject.ucmTermodinámica
dc.subject.unesco2213 Termodinámica
dc.titleComparing the desalination performance of SMM blended polyethersulfone to SMM blended polyetherimide membranes by direct contact membrane distillation
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number5
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8e32e718-0959-4e6c-9e04-891d3d43d640
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8e32e718-0959-4e6c-9e04-891d3d43d640

Download

Collections