Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Robust Ranking of Journal Quality: An Application to Economics

dc.contributor.authorChang, Chia-Lin
dc.contributor.authorMaasoumi, Esfandiar
dc.contributor.authorMcAleer, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T09:14:20Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T09:14:20Z
dc.date.issued2012-03
dc.description.abstractThe paper focuses on the robustness of rankings of academic journal quality and research impact in general, and in Economics, in particular, based on the widely-used Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database (ISI). The paper analyses 299 leading international journals in Economics using quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAMs), and highlights the similarities and differences in various RAMs, which are based on alternative transformations of citations. All existing RAMs to date have been static, so two new dynamic RAMs are developed to capture changes in impact factor over time and escalating journal self citations. Alternative RAMs may be calculated annually or updated daily to determine When, Where and How (frequently) published papers are cited (see Chang et al. (2011a, b, c)). The RAMs are grouped in four distinct classes that include impact factor, mean citations and non-citations, journal policy, number of high quality papers, and journal influence and article influence. These classes include the most widely used RAMs, namely the classic 2-year impact factor including journal self citations (2YIF), 2-year impact factor excluding journal self citations (2YIF*), 5-year impact factor including journal self citations (5YIF), Eigenfactor (or Journal Influence), Article Influence, h-index, and PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors). As all existing RAMs to date have been static, two new dynamic RAMs are developed to capture changes in impact factor over time (5YD2 = 5YIF/2YIF) and Escalating Self Citations. We highlight robust rankings based on the harmonic mean of the ranks of RAMs across the 4 classes. It is shown that emphasizing the 2-year impact factor of a journal, which partly answers the question as to When published papers are cited, to the exclusion of other informative RAMs, which answer Where and How (frequently) published papers are cited, can lead to a distorted evaluation of journal quality, impact and influence relative to the harmonic mean of the ranks.
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
dc.description.facultyInstituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
dc.description.refereedFALSE
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Council, Taiwan
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian Research Council
dc.description.sponsorshipJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
dc.description.statusunpub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/14791
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.ucm.es/icae
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/49080
dc.issue.number05
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.total53
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDocumentos de Trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
dc.subject.jelC18
dc.subject.jelC81
dc.subject.jelY10
dc.subject.keywordResearch assessment measures
dc.subject.keywordImpact factor
dc.subject.keywordIFI
dc.subject.keywordC3PO
dc.subject.keywordPI-BETA
dc.subject.keywordSTAR
dc.subject.keywordEigenfactor
dc.subject.keywordArticle Influence
dc.subject.keywordh-index
dc.subject.keyword5YD2
dc.subject.keywordESC
dc.subject.keywordHarmonic mean of the ranks
dc.subject.keywordEconomics
dc.subject.keywordJournal rankings.
dc.subject.ucmEconometría (Economía)
dc.subject.ucmRecuperación de la información
dc.subject.unesco5302 Econometría
dc.titleRobust Ranking of Journal Quality: An Application to Economics
dc.typetechnical report
dc.volume.number2012
dcterms.referencesBergstrom C. (2007), Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, C&RL News, 68, 314-316. Bergstrom, C.T. and. J.D. West (2008), Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor™ metrics, Neurology, 71, 1850–1851. Bergstrom, C.T., J.D. West and M.A. Wiseman (2008), The Eigenfactor™ metrics, Journal of Neuroscience, 28(45), 11433–11434 (November 5, 2008). Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011a), What makes a great journal great in economics? The singer not the song, Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 326-361. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011b), What makes a great journal great in the sciences? Which came first, the chicken or the egg?, Scientometrics, 87(1), 17-40. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011c), Great expectatrics: Great papers, great journals, great econometrics, Econometric Reviews, 30(6), 583-619. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011d), How are journal impact, prestige and article influence related? An application to neuroscience, Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(11), 2563-2573. Hirsch, J.E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-15572 (November 15, 2005). ISI Web of Science (2011), Journal Citation Reports, Essential Science Indicators, Thomson Reuters ISI. Seglen, P.O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498-502.
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1205.pdf
Size:
200.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format