Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

External focus of attention and autonomy support have additive benefits for motor performance in children

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Full text at PDC

Publication date

2017

Advisors (or tutors)

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
Citations
Google Scholar

Citation

Abdollahipour, R., Palomo-Nieto, M., Psotta, R., & Wulf, G. (2017). External focus of attention and autonomy support have additive benefits for motor performance in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 32, 17-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.05.004

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the combined effects of external focus instructions and autonomy support on motor performance of children. In addition, we sought to provide evidence for an increased focus on the task goal under the external focus condition by using an inattentional blindness manipulation. Design: Within-participant design. Method: Thirty-six children (mean age = 8.5 ± 1.3 years) were asked to perform a bowling task with their dominant hand. Each participant performed 8 trials under external focus (path of the ball), internal focus (hand), or control conditions. In each attentional focus condition, they performed half of the trials under a choice (autonomy support) condition, in which they were able to choose among 4 bowling balls, and a no-choice condition (white ball). Results: The external focus instruction resulted in greater bowling accuracy (i.e., more pins knocked down) than internal focus and no instructions (control). Furthermore, choice resulted in more effective performance than no choice. Thus, both factors had additive benefits for performance. There was some evidence for an increased task focus in the external condition. Conclusions: The present results show that, within the same individuals, instructions to adopt an external focus and the provision of a small choice contributed independently to enhance motor performance in children.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Referencias bibliográficas: • Barlas, Z., Obhi, S.S., Freedom, choice, and the sense of agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 2013, 514, 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00514. • Bell, J.J., Hardy, J., Effects of attentional focus on skilled performance in golf. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 21 (2009), 163–177, 10.1080/10413200902795323. • Bernardi, G., Ricciardi, E., Sani, L., Gaglianese, A., Papasogli, A., Ceccarelli, R.,.. Pietrini, P., How skill expertise shapes the brain functional architecture: An fMRI study of visuo-spatial and motor processing in professional racing-car and naïve drivers. PLoS One, 8(10), 2013, e77764, 10.1371/journal.pone.0077764. • Buckner, R.L., The serendipitous discovery of the brain's default network. Neuroimage 62 (2012), 1137–1145, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.035. • Cartwright-Finch, U., Lavie, N., The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition 102 (2007), 321–340, 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.002. • Chambon, V., Haggard, P., Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance. Cognition 125 (2012), 441–451, 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.011. • Chen, D.D., Hendrick, J.L., Lidor, R., Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: The use of self-regulated feedback information. Journal of Human Movement Studies 43 (2002), 69–86. • Chiviacowsky, S., Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 15 (2014), 505–510, 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003. • Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 73 (2002), 408–415, 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040. • Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Ávila, L.T.G., An external focus of attention enhances motor learning in children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57 (2013), 627–634, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01569.x. • Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Medeiros, F., Kaefer, A., Tani, G., Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year old children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 79 (2008), 405–410, 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599505. • Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed., 1988, Routledge Academic, New York, NY. • Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11 (2000), 227–268, 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01. • Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., Self-Determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology 49 (2008), 182–185, 10.1037/a0012801. • Duke, R.A., Cash, C.D., Allen, S.E., Focus of attention affects performance of motor skills in music. Journal of Research in Music Education 59 (2011), 44–55, 10.1177/0022429410396093. • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., GPOWER: A priori, posthoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS. [Computer software], 1992, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany. • Feltz, D.L., Chow, D.M., Hepler, T.J., Path analysis of self-efficacy and diving performance revisited. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 30 (2008), 401–411, 10.1123/jsep.30.3.401. • de Fockert, J.W., Bremner, A.J., Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: Elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition 121 (2011), 400–408, 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.016. • Hadler, R., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Schild, J.F., Children's learning of tennis skills is facilitated by external focus instructions. Motriz 20 (2014), 418–422, 10.1590/S1980-65742014000400008. • Halperin, I., Chapman, D.W., Martin, D.T., Lewthwaite, R., Wulf, G., Choices enhance punching performance of competitive kickboxers. Psychological Research. Advance online Publication, 2016, 10.1007/s00426-016-0790-1. • Hartman, J.M., Self-controlled use of a perceived physical assistance device during a balancing task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 104 (2007), 1005–1016, 10.2466/pms.104.3.1005-1016. • Hoaglin, D.C., Iglewicz, B., Tukey, J.W., Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labelling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (1986), 991–999, 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478363. • Hooyman, A., Wulf, Lewthwaite, R., Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement Science 36 (2014), 190–198, 10.1016/j.humov.2014.04.005. • Kal, E., van der Kamp, J., Houdijk, H., External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: A comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Human Movement Science 32 (2013), 527–539, 10.1016/j.humov.2013.04.001. • Karsh, N., Eitam, B., I control therefore I do: Judgments of agency influence action selection. Cognition 138 (2015), 122–131, 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.002. • Larson-Hall, J., A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. 2009, Routledge, New York, NY. • Legault, L., Inzlicht, M., Self-determination, self-regulation and the brain: Autonomy improves performance by enhancing neuroaffective responsiveness to self-regulation failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105 (2013), 123–138, 10.1037/a0030426. • Leotti, L.A., Delgado, M.R., The inherent reward of choice. Psychological Science 22 (2011), 1310–1318, 10.1177/0956797611417005. • Leotti, L.A., Iyengar, S.S., Ochsner, K.N., Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (2010), 457–463, 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001. • Lewthwaite, R., Chiviacowsky, S., Drews, R., Wulf, G., Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22 (2015), 1383–1388, 10.3758/s13423-015-0814-7. • Lohse, K.R., Jones, M., Healy, A.F., Sherwood, D.E., The role of attention in motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2014), 930–948, 10.1037/a003281. • Lohse, K.R., Sherwood, D.E., Healy, A.F., How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics, and electromyography in dart throwing. Human Movement Science 29 (2010), 542–555, 10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.001. • Lohse, K.R., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., Attentional focus affects movement efficiency. Hodges, N.J., Williams, A.M., (eds.) Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory & practice, 2nd ed., 2012, United Kingdom: Routlegde, London, 40–58. • Mack, A., Rock, I., Inattentional blindness. 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. • Marchant, D.C., Attentional focusing instructions and force production. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 2011, 210, 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00210. • Marchant, D.C., Clough, P.J., Crawshaw, M., The effects of attentional focusing strategies on novice dart throwing performance and their task experiences. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 5 (2007), 291–303, 10.1080/1612197X.2007.9671837. • Marchant, D.C., Clough, P.J., Crawshaw, M., Levy, A., Novice motor skill performance and task experience is influenced by attentional focus instructions and instruction preferences. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 7 (2009), 488–502, 10.1080/1612197X.2009.9671921. • Marchant, D.C., Greig, M., Scott, C., Attentional focusing instructions influence force production and muscular activity during isokinetic elbow flexions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 23 (2009), 2358–2366, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b8d1e5. • Masson, M.E., Loftus, G.R., Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (2003), 203–220, 10.1037/h0087426. • McKay, B., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., Nordin, A., The self: Your own worst enemy? A test of the self-invoking trigger hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (2015), 1910–1919, 10.1080/17470218.2014.997765. • McNevin, N.H., Shea, C.H., Wulf, G., Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning. Psychological Research 67 (2003), 22–29, 10.1007/s00426-002-0093-6. • Menon, V., Salience network. Toga, A.W., (eds.) Brain mapping: An encyclopedic reference, Vol. 2, 2015, Academic Press: Elsevier, London, United Kingdom, 597–611. • Milton, J., Solodkin, A., Hluštík, P., Small, S.L., The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused. Neuroimage 35 (2007), 804–813, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.003. • Morris, S.B., DeShon, R.P., Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods 7 (2002), 105–125, 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105. • Neumann, D.L., Brown, J., The effect of attentional focus strategy on physiological and motor performance during a sit-up exercise. Journal of Psychophysiology 27 (2013), 7–15, 10.1027/0269-8803/a000081. • Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., Panksepp, J., Self-referential processing in our brain – a meta-analysis of imaging studies of the self. NeuroImage 31 (2006), 440–457, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002. • Patall, E.A., Cooper, H., Robinson, J.C., The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 134 (2008), 270–300, 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270. • Perreault, M.E., French, K.E., External-focus feedback benefits free-throw learning in children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 86 (2015), 422–427, 10.1080/02701367.2015.1051613. • Post, P.G., Fairbrother, J.T., Barros, J.A., Kulpa, J.D., Self-controlled practice within a fixed time period facilitates the learning of a basketball set shot. Journal of Motor Learning and Development 2 (2014), 9–15, 10.1123/jmld.2013-0008. • Reeve, J., Tseng, C., Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (2011), 257–267, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002. • Russell, R., Porter, J., Campbell, O., An external skill focus is necessary to enhance performance. Journal of Motor Learning and Development 2 (2014), 37–46, 10.1123/jmld.2014-0038. • Sanli, E.A., Patterson, J.T., Bray, S.R., Lee, T.D., Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 2013, 611, 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611. • Schücker, L., Anheier, W., Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., Völker, K., On the optimal focus of attention for efficient running at high intensity. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology 2 (2013), 207–219, 10.1037/a0031959. • Schücker, L., Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., Völker, K., The effect of attentional focus on running economy. Journal of Sports Sciences 27 (2009), 1241–1248, 10.1080/02640410903150467. • Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F., Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28 (1999), 1059–1074, 10.1068/p281059. • Wulf, G., Attention and motor skill learning. 2007, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. • Wulf, G., Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 93 (2007), 96–101, 10.1016/j.physio.2006.08.005. • Wulf, G., Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 6 (2013), 77–104, 10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728. • Wulf, G., Adams, N., Small choices can enhance balance learning. Human Movement Science 38 (2014), 235–240, 10.1016/j.humov.2014.10.007. • Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., Cardozo, P., Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science 37 (2014), 12–20, 10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004. • Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., Drews, R., External focus and autonomy support: Two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits. Human Movement Science 40 (2015), 176–184, 10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.015. • Wulf, G., Dufek, J.S., Lozano, L., Pettigrew, C., Increased jump height and reduced EMG activity with an external focus of attention. Human Movement Science 29 (2010), 440–448, 10.1016/j.humov.2009.11.008. • Wulf, G., Höß, M., Prinz, W., Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior 30 (1998), 169–179, 10.1080/00222899809601334. • Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. Bruya, B., (eds.) Effortless attention: A new perspective in attention and action, 2010, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 75–101. • Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23 (2016), 1382–1414, 10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9. • Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., Cardozo, P., Chiviacowsky, S., Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2017, 10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204. • Wulf, G., McConnel, N., Gärtner, M., Schwarz, A., Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior 34 (2002), 171–182, 10.1080/00222890209601939. • Wulf, G., McNevin, N.H., Fuchs, T., Ritter, F., Toole, T., Attentional focus in complex motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 71 (2000), 229–239, 10.1080/02701367.2000.10608903. • Wulf, G., McNevin, N.H., Shea, C.H., The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A (2001), 1143–1154, 10.1080/713756012. • Wulf, G., Prinz, W., Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 (2001), 648–660, 10.3758/BF03196201. • Wulf, G., Su, J., An external focus of attention enhances golf shot accuracy in beginners and experts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 78 (2007), 384–389, 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599436. • Zachry, T., Wulf, G., Mercer, J., Bezodis, N., Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Research Bulletin 67 (2005), 304–309, 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.035.

Unesco subjects

Keywords

Collections