Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA Disculpen las molestias.
 

Calcium phosphate modified with silicon vs. bovine hydroxyapatite for alveolar ridge preservation: Densitometric evaluation, morphological changes and histomorphometric study

dc.contributor.authorCadenas Vacas, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Rodríguez, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorBarona Dorado, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Labrador, Luis
dc.contributor.authorCortés Bretón Brinkmann, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorMeniz García, Cristina María
dc.contributor.authorMartínez González, José María
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-17T11:59:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-17T11:59:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-17
dc.descriptionFI: 3,748 ; 18/79; Q1; Metallurgy & Metallugical Engineering, 2021; AP= No
dc.description.abstractAfter tooth extraction, the alveolar bone undergoes a physiological resorption that may compromise the future placement of the implant in its ideal position. This study evaluated bone density, morphological changes, and histomorphometric results undergone by alveolar bone after applying a new biomaterial composed of calcium phosphate modified with silicon (CAPO-Si) compared with hydroxyapatite of bovine origin (BHA). Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) was performed in 24 alveoli, divided into a test group filled with CAPO-Si and a control group filled with BHA. Three months later, the mineral bone density obtained by the biomaterials, horizontal and vertical bone loss, the degree of alveolar corticalization, and histomorphometric results were evaluated. Both biomaterials presented similar behavior in terms of densitometric results, vertical bone loss, and degree of alveolar corticalization. Alveoli treated with CAPO-Si showed less horizontal bone loss in comparison with alveoli treated with BHA (0.99 ± 0.2 mm vs. 1.3 ± 0.3 mm), with statistically significant difference (p = 0.017). Histomorphometric results showed greater bone neoformation in the test group than the control group (23 ± 15% vs. 11 ± 7%) (p = 0.039) and less residual biomaterial (5 ± 10% vs. 17 ± 13%) (p = 0.043) with statistically significant differences. In conclusion, the ARP technique obtains better results with CAPO-Si than with BHA.en
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Odontología Conservadora y Prótesis
dc.description.facultyFac. de Odontología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationCadenas-Vacas G, Martínez-Rodríguez N, Barona-Dorado C, Sánchez-Labrador L, Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann J, Meniz-García C, Martínez-González JM. Calcium Phosphate Modified with Silicon vs. Bovine Hydroxyapatite for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Densitometric Evaluation, Morphological Changes and Histomorphometric Study. Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 17;14(4):940. doi: 10.3390/ma14040940.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma14040940
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps//doi.org/10.3390/ma14040940
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/4/940
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/93588
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial940
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu616.314-089.843
dc.subject.keywordBiomaterials
dc.subject.keywordCalcium phosphate
dc.subject.keywordSilicon
dc.subject.keywordBovine hydroxyapatite
dc.subject.keywordAlveolar preservation
dc.subject.ucmImplantes dentales
dc.subject.unesco3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología
dc.titleCalcium phosphate modified with silicon vs. bovine hydroxyapatite for alveolar ridge preservation: Densitometric evaluation, morphological changes and histomorphometric studyen
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number14
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbc1e4abf-d1b7-4954-b664-8ed46eeb6a61
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0e287483-b6da-4ce6-beaa-94bb0a0c9dc8
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb3d08922-245d-473f-bd12-d176f463961e
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione9ca2f79-0fd4-4bfd-b42b-dec8f1aa627c
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationba2546c2-c989-453d-a799-ffad2edea524
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybc1e4abf-d1b7-4954-b664-8ed46eeb6a61

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
materials_14_00940_pdf.pdf
Size:
2.57 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections