A comparison of the clinical efficacy of echocardiography and magnetic resonance for chronic aortic regurgitation
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2020
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Citations
Exportar
Citation
Andrea Postigo, Esther Pérez-David, Ana Revilla, Ladrón Abia Raquel, Ana González-Mansilla, Raquel Prieto-Arévalo, M Ángeles Espinosa, Rosa Ana López-Jimenez, Teresa Sevilla, Noelia Urueña, Pablo Martínez-Legazpi, José M Oliver, Francisco Fernández-Avilés, San Román J. Alberto, Javier Bermejo, A comparison of the clinical efficacy of echocardiography and magnetic resonance for chronic aortic regurgitation, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, Volume 23, Issue 3, March 2022, Pages 392–401, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa338
Abstract
This article investigates advanced imaging techniques for evaluating cardiovascular function and their prognostic significance in clinical practice. It highlights the role of novel echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters in assessing myocardial function, valvular disease, and vascular abnormalities. The study emphasizes the integration of these imaging modalities to improve risk stratification, guide therapeutic decisions, and enhance patient outcomes. By providing robust evidence, the article advocates for a more comprehensive and individualized approach in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases.