Clinical Evaluation of the New Rebound Tonometers Icare PRO and Icare ONE Compared With the Goldmann Tonometer

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Montañes, Javier
dc.contributor.authorMartínez De La Casa Fernández-Borrella, José María
dc.contributor.authorSabater, Alfonso L.
dc.contributor.authorMorales Fernández, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSáenz, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Feijoo, Julián
dc.dateReceived for publication February 4, 2013; accepted March 5, 2014
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T05:42:29Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T05:42:29Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To compare the participant-obtained intraocular pressures (IOPs) using Icare ONE and the clinician-obtained values using Icare PRO, both rebound tonometers, with Goldmann tonometry (GAT) values and analyze the ease of use of Icare ONE. METHODS: One hundred fifty participants were included (60 normal controls, 90 patients with glaucoma/ocular hypertension). The participants measured the IOP 3 times using Icare ONE; a clinician measured the IOP once using Icare PRO. The instruments were used randomly. Clinical data were evaluated to analyze the difficulty of the technique, the effect on the results, and the ease of use of Icare ONE. RESULTS: The mean IOPs with GAT, Icare ONE, and Icare PRO were 16.6±4.43, 17.5±5.42, and 16.6±4.77 mm Hg, respectively. The participant-measured IOP values were within +3 mm Hg of the GAT values in 67.1% of eyes with Icare ONE and in 79.6% with Icare PRO. The limits of agreement were higher with Icare ONE compared with Icare PRO. IOP value errors were found with Icare ONE in eyes with low and high GAT-IOP. The areas under the curve to detect IOPs of 21 mm Hg or higher (GAT) exceeded 0.80 with both tonometers. Young participants reported better ease of use with Icare ONE. No other factors were related to the results. CONCLUSIONS: Icare ONE may be useful for patients monitoring their IOP values; most individuals can use the device after a short training session. Icare PRO had better results compared with Icare ONE in all IOP ranges.en
dc.description.departmentUnidad Docente de Inmunología, Oftalmología y ORL
dc.description.facultyFac. de Óptica y Optometría
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.description.sponsorshipRed tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/41192
dc.identifier.citationMoreno Montañés, J., Martínez De La Casa Fernández-Borrella, J. M., Sabater, A. L. et al. «Clinical Evaluation of the New Rebound Tonometers Icare PRO and Icare ONE Compared With the Goldmann Tonometer»: Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 24, n.o 7, septiembre de 2015, pp. 527-32. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000058.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/IJG.0000000000000058
dc.identifier.issn1057-0829
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000058
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/23115
dc.issue.number7
dc.journal.titleJournal of Glaucoma
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final532
dc.page.initial527
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health
dc.relation.projectIDRD07/0062
dc.relation.projectIDRD07/0062: Patologia ocular del envejecimiento, calidad visual y calidad de vida”
dc.relation.projectID920415-GR58/08
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.cdu617.7-007.681
dc.subject.cdu617.749
dc.subject.keywordIntraocular pressure
dc.subject.keywordRebound tonometer
dc.subject.keywordAutotonometry
dc.subject.keywordGoldmann tonometer
dc.subject.keywordIcare tonometer
dc.subject.keywordGlaucoma
dc.subject.ucmOftalmología
dc.subject.ucmAnatomía ocular
dc.subject.unesco3201.09 Oftalmología
dc.titleClinical Evaluation of the New Rebound Tonometers Icare PRO and Icare ONE Compared With the Goldmann Tonometeren
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number24
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication273a99c3-2c9f-4dd0-8939-b7ff3593124c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication558b8023-6d72-4dff-9f99-2e60f6f31843
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery558b8023-6d72-4dff-9f99-2e60f6f31843
Download
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Clinical evaluation_2015.pdf
Size:
214.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Artículos