Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach

dc.contributor.authorRíos Tamayo, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, María José
dc.contributor.authorGómez Rojas, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Barranco, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorSegura, Gloria Pérez
dc.contributor.authorRedondo Sánchez, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCarreño Tarragona, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez Nicolás, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Cabello, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorLahuerta, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorMartínez López, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Rafael F.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-22T12:51:10Z
dc.date.available2023-06-22T12:51:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-11
dc.descriptionFundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain Registro de Cáncer de Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), 18080 Granada, Spain Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain Immunology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain
dc.description.abstractDespite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Additionally, immunophenotype results and preanalytical issues were also evaluated. Clinical and statistical differences between both cutoffs and both methods were checked. An independent control group of 122 patients was included. All comparisons between both cutoffs and both methods for all relevant types of cells did not show statistically significant differences. No significant diagnostic discrepancies were demonstrated in the contingency table analysis. This is a real-life study, and some limitations may be pointed out, such as a different sample sizes according to the type of cell in the immunophenotype analysis, the lack of standardization of some preanalytical events, and the relatively small sample size of the control group. The comparisons of differentials by morphology on 200 and 500 cells, as well as by morphology (both cutoffs) and by immunophenotype, are equivalent from the clinical and statistical point of view. The preanalytical issues play a critical role in the assessment of bone marrow aspirate samples.
dc.description.facultyFac. de Medicina
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipFundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
dc.description.sponsorshipCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (Ibs.GRANADA)
dc.description.sponsorshipRegistro de Cáncer de Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP)
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada
dc.description.sponsorshipHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
dc.description.sponsorshipImmunology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/77564
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics13061071
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061071
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttp://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/6/1071
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/73255
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleDiagnostics
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial1071
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.subject.cdu616.15
dc.subject.cdu611.018.4
dc.subject.keywordBone marrow aspirate
dc.subject.keywordCytomorphology
dc.subject.keywordNext generation Flow
dc.subject.keywordDifferential cell counts
dc.subject.keyword200 vs 500 cutoffs
dc.subject.keywordISO15189
dc.subject.keywordPreanalytical quality
dc.subject.keywordMultiple mieloma
dc.subject.keywordPlasma cells
dc.subject.keywordBlasts
dc.subject.keywordDiagnostic
dc.subject.keywordEfficiency
dc.subject.keywordClinical laboratory
dc.subject.keywordClinical significance
dc.subject.ucmMedicina
dc.subject.ucmHematología
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicas
dc.subject.unesco3205.04 Hematología
dc.titleCell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number13
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5d58b324-f60e-4598-941b-4a07291634a9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5d58b324-f60e-4598-941b-4a07291634a9

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
diagnostics-13-01071-v3.pdf
Size:
906.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections