Novedades del léxico común en la lexicografía extraacadémica del siglo XIX (1800-1852). ¿Neologismos o no?
Loading...
Download
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Defense date
06/05/2024
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citation
Abstract
Desde el redescubrimiento de la corriente lexicográfica extraacadémica que compitió con la Real Academia Española por el mercado editorial en el siglo XIX, numerosos estudios han visto la luz con el objetivo de describir y caracterizar estos diccionarios, que representan un modelo distinto al académico, más aperturista, en el que tienen cabida tanto las innovaciones del ámbito científico y técnico como los usos vigentes de la lengua común. Toda la comunidad investigadora está de acuerdo en que, a pesar del orgullo con el que estos diccionarios se presentan como superadores de la nomenclatura académica, la aportación de esta corriente lexicográfica es notablemente inferior a las cifras que se estampaban en las portadas; sin embargo, son pocos los que ofrecen datos cuantitativos precisos que informen sobre el grado de originalidad de estas obras y menos aún los que atienden al léxico común, donde cabría encontrar neologismos que la Academia no había considerado aún...
Since the rediscovery of the dictionaries that competed with the Royal Spanish Academy for the publishing market in the 19th century, numerous studies have emerged with the aim of describing and characterizing them. They represent a distinct model from the academic one, more open-minded, accommodating both new words from the scientific and technical fields and those of the common language. The entire research community agrees that, despite the pride with which the lexicographers present themselves as the authors of the most complete dictionaries, their contribution is noticeably inferior to what they proclaimed on the covers. However, few studies provide precise quantitative data that inform about the degree of originality of these works, and even fewer focus on common lexicon, where neologisms that the Spanish Academy had not yet considered might be found...
Since the rediscovery of the dictionaries that competed with the Royal Spanish Academy for the publishing market in the 19th century, numerous studies have emerged with the aim of describing and characterizing them. They represent a distinct model from the academic one, more open-minded, accommodating both new words from the scientific and technical fields and those of the common language. The entire research community agrees that, despite the pride with which the lexicographers present themselves as the authors of the most complete dictionaries, their contribution is noticeably inferior to what they proclaimed on the covers. However, few studies provide precise quantitative data that inform about the degree of originality of these works, and even fewer focus on common lexicon, where neologisms that the Spanish Academy had not yet considered might be found...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filología, leída el 08-05-2024