A Secondary Analysis of Gender Respiratory Features for Ultrasonography Bilateral Diaphragm Thickness, Respiratory Pressures, and Pulmonary Function in Low Back Pain

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMolina Hernández, Nerea
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Sanz, David
dc.contributor.authorLópez Chicharro, José
dc.contributor.authorBecerro De Bengoa Vallejo, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLosa Iglesias, Marta Elena
dc.contributor.authorVicente Campos, Davinia
dc.contributor.authorMarugán Rubio, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Torre, Samuel Eloy
dc.contributor.authorCalvo Lobo, César
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-15T11:08:14Z
dc.date.available2024-07-15T11:08:14Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-03
dc.descriptionGrant PID2020-117162RA-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 corresponding to the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and the State Agency for Investigation from the Spanish Government by the 2020 Call for Innovation, Development and Research (“I + D + i Projects”) with the framework of the State Programs for Knowledge Generation and Scientific and Technological Strengthening of the I + D + i System as well as I + D + i oriented to the Challenges of Society. 2022 Descuento MDPI
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to determine the gender respiratory differences of bilateral diaphragm thickness, respiratory pressures, and pulmonary function in patients with low back pain (LBP). A sample of 90 participants with nonspecific LBP was recruited and matched paired by sex (45 women and 45 men). Respiratory outcomes included bilateral diaphragm thickness by ultrasonography, respiratory muscle strength by maximum inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressures, and pulmonary function by forced expiratory volume during 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC spirometry parameters. The comparison of respiratory outcomes presented significant differences (p < 0.001), with a large effect size (d = 1.26–1.58) showing means differences (95% CI) for MIP of −32.26 (−42.99, −21.53) cm H2O, MEP of −50.66 (−64.08, −37.25) cm H2O, FEV1 of −0.92 (−1.18, −0.65) L, and FVC of −1.00 (−1.32, −0.69) L, with lower values for females versus males. Gender-based respiratory differences were presented for maximum respiratory pressures and pulmonary function in patients with nonspecific LBP. Women presented greater inspiratory and expiratory muscle weakness as well as worse lung function, although these differences were not linked to diaphragm thickness during normal breathing
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Enfermería
dc.description.facultyFac. de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología
dc.description.fundingtypeDescuento UCM
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationMolina-Hernández N, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Chicharro JL, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Vicente-Campos D, Marugán-Rubio D, Gutiérrez-Torre SE, Calvo-Lobo C. A Secondary Analysis of Gender Respiratory Features for Ultrasonography Bilateral Diaphragm Thickness, Respiratory Pressures, and Pulmonary Function in Low Back Pain. Tomography. 2024 Jun 3;10(6):880-893. doi: 10.3390/tomography10060067.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/tomography10060067
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/10/6/67
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/106104
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleTomography
dc.language.isospa
dc.page.final893
dc.page.initial880
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu615.8
dc.subject.keyworddiaphragm
dc.subject.keyworddisability
dc.subject.keywordlow back pain
dc.subject.keywordquality of life
dc.subject.keywordrespiration
dc.subject.keywordultrasonography
dc.subject.ucmFisioterapia (Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología)
dc.subject.unesco3213.11 Fisioterapia
dc.titleA Secondary Analysis of Gender Respiratory Features for Ultrasonography Bilateral Diaphragm Thickness, Respiratory Pressures, and Pulmonary Function in Low Back Pain
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number10
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3d3e5c8a-15a9-4991-97ee-ea886940b1a5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4d976e8b-fa6d-4f5a-8d13-ad192232e5bc
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbbd621a9-7baf-481a-83c7-124287192d07
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9420a0f4-5654-4ad9-a920-e9521d454023
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d3e5c8a-15a9-4991-97ee-ea886940b1a5
Download
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A_Secondary_Analysis.pdf
Size:
692.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download
Collections
Artículos