Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Ecological relevance of non-perennial rivers for the conservation of terrestrial and aquatic communities

dc.contributor.authorBruno, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHermoso, Virgilio
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Montoya, María Del Mar
dc.contributor.authorBelmar, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Cánovas, Cayetano
dc.contributor.authorCañedo-Argüelles, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T11:46:50Z
dc.date.available2024-02-27T11:46:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractRiver conservation efforts traditionally focus on perennial watercourses (i.e., those that do not dry) and their associated aquatic biodiversity. However, most of the global river network is not perennial and thus supports both aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity. We assessed the conservation value of nonperennial rivers and streams (NPRS) in one of Europe's driest regions based on aquatic (macroinvertebrates, diatoms) and terrestrial (riparian plants, birds, and carabid beetles) community data. We mapped the distribution of taxa at 90 locations and across wide environmental gradients. Using the systematic planning tool Marxan, we identified priority conservation sites under 2 scenarios: aquatic taxa alone or aquatic and terrestrial taxa together. We explored how environmental factors (runoff, flow intermittence, elevation, salinity, anthropogenic impact) influenced Marxan's site selection frequency. The NPRS were selected more frequently (over 13% on average) than perennial rivers when both aquatic and terrestrial taxa were considered, suggesting that NPRS have a high conservation value at the catchment scale. We detected an underrepresentation of terrestrial taxa (8.4–10.6% terrestrial vs. 0.5–1.1% aquatic taxa were unrepresented in most Marxan solutions) when priority sites were identified based exclusively on aquatic biodiversity, which points to a low surrogacy value of aquatic taxa for terrestrial taxa. Runoff explained site selection when focusing on aquatic taxa (all best-fitting models included runoff, r2 = 0.26–0.27), whereas elevation, salinity, and flow intermittence were more important when considering both groups. In both cases, site selection frequency declined as anthropogenic impact increased. Our results highlight the need to integrate terrestrial and aquatic communities when identifying priority areas for conservation in catchments with NPRS. This is key to overcoming drawbacks of traditional assessments based only on aquatic taxa and to ensure the conservation of NPRS, especially as NPRS become more prevalent worldwide due to climate change and increasing water demands.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Biológicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.description.sponsorshipFundación Séneca Murcia
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationBruno, Daniel, et al. «Ecological Relevance of Non‐perennial Rivers for the Conservation of Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities». Conservation Biology, vol. 36, n.o 6, diciembre de 2022, p. e13982. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13982.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cobi.13982
dc.identifier.essn1523-1739
dc.identifier.issn0888-8892
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/101768
dc.issue.number6
dc.journal.titleConservation Biology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final14
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.projectID(RTI2018-097950-B-C22)
dc.relation.projectID(RYC2020-029829-I)
dc.relation.projectID(IJC2018-036642-I)
dc.relation.projectID(20645/JLI/18)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu574.5
dc.subject.keywordAquatic macroinvertebrates
dc.subject.keywordBirds
dc.subject.keywordCarabid beetles
dc.subject.keywordDiatoms
dc.subject.keywordIntermittent rivers
dc.subject.keywordMarxan
dc.subject.keywordMediterranean rivers
dc.subject.keywordNon-perennialrivers
dc.subject.keywordRiparian vegetation
dc.subject.ucmEcología (Biología)
dc.subject.unesco2401.06 Ecología Animal
dc.titleEcological relevance of non-perennial rivers for the conservation of terrestrial and aquatic communities
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number36
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5af1ce13-5e9f-466a-ab4a-86646a2a7dfa
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5af1ce13-5e9f-466a-ab4a-86646a2a7dfa

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Conservation_of_terrestrial_and_aquatic_communities.pdf
Size:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections