Morton’s Extension on Hallux Rigidus Pathology

dc.contributor.authorSánchez Gómez, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Alcorocho Sánchez, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorNuñez Fernández, Almudena
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Fernández, María Luz
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Sebastian, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorOrtuño Soriano, Ismael
dc.contributor.authorZaragoza García, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorGómez Carrión, Álvaro
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-22T12:54:28Z
dc.date.available2023-06-22T12:54:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-21
dc.description.abstractStudy design, case-control study: Background, Morton’s extension (ME) is a kind of orthotic that has been used as a conservative treatment of painful hallux rigidus (HR) osteoarthritis, but only their effects on first metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) mobility and position in healthy subjects have been studied, but not on its applied pulled tension forces neither in subjects with HR. Objectives: This study sought to understand how ME’s orthotics with three different thicknesses could influence the kinematic first MPJ by measuring hallux dorsiflexion using Jack’s test and a digital algometer with a rigid strip anchored to the iron hook’s extremity and comparing subjects with healthy first MPJ mobility to those with HR. We aimed to clarify whether tension values were different between healthy and HR subjects. Methods: Fifty-eight subjects were selected, of whom thirty were included in the case group according to HR criteria and twenty-eight were included in the control group. A digital algometer (FPX®® 25, Wagner Instruments®®, Greenwich, CT, USA) was used to assess the pulled tension values (kgf) of the first MPJ during Jack’s test. Results: The pulled tension values were highly reliable (ICC > 0.963). There were no statistically significant differences between the pulled tension values for the different ME conditions in the case (p = 0.969) or control (p = 0.718) groups. However, as it’s expected, there were statistically significant differences comparing all pulled tension values between case and control group subjects (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Different ME’s thicknesses had no influence on the pulled effort applied during the dorsiflexion Jack’s test between the healthy and HR groups; therefore, it can be prescribed without joint-care danger. In addition, it is proven that there is greater resistance to performing Jack’s test in the HR group than in the healthy group, regardless of ME’s orthotics. Furthermore, it is shown that the digital algometer device is a valid tool to detect the first MPJ restriction and is more reliable than other tests.
dc.description.facultyFac. de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/77735
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/prosthesis5010019
dc.identifier.issn2673-1592
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010019
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2673-1592/5/1/19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/73314
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleProsthesis
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final263
dc.page.initial251
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.subject.cdu616.718.7/.9
dc.subject.keywordAlgometer
dc.subject.keywordHallux rigidus
dc.subject.keywordMetatarsal bones
dc.subject.keywordMetatarsophalangeal joint
dc.subject.ucmPodología
dc.titleMorton’s Extension on Hallux Rigidus Pathology
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number5
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdc143899-0041-4a0f-8dd2-d696077ec375
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8d76d9b5-d300-4be3-9778-e5a4f13507fa
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa7c35cc0-1f3f-41ad-a7c2-4d6a1a8bf64f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication61989576-46c1-456c-bca0-73cd8e2581a3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverydc143899-0041-4a0f-8dd2-d696077ec375

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
prosthesis-05-00019-v2.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections