External validation and comparison of the CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II risk scores in real-world cardiogenic shock patients
dc.contributor.author | Rivas Lasarte, Mercedes | |
dc.contributor.author | Noriega, Francisco J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Viana Tejedor, Ana Teresa | |
dc.contributor.author | Sionis, Alessandro | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-09T10:34:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-09T10:34:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-06-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | Mortality from cardiogenic shock remains high and early recognition and risk stratification are mandatory for optimal patient allocation and to guide treatment strategy. The CardShock and the Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock (IABP-SHOCK II) risk scores have shown good results in predicting short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. However, to date, they have not been compared in a large cohort of ischaemic and non-ischaemic real-world cardiogenic shock patients. The Red-Shock is a multicentre cohort of non-selected cardiogenic shock patients. We calculated the CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II risk scores in each patient and assessed discrimination and calibration. Results: We included 696 patients. The main cause of cardiogenic shock was acute coronary syndrome, occurring in 62% of the patients. Compared with acute coronary syndrome patients, non-acute coronary syndrome patients were younger and had a lower proportion of risk factors but higher rates of renal insufficiency; intra-aortic balloon pump was also less frequently used (31% vs 56%). In contrast, non-acute coronary syndrome patients were more often treated with mechanical circulatory support devices (11% vs 3%, p=0.001 for both). Both risk scores were good predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients and had similar areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (area under the curve: 0.742 for the CardShock vs 0.752 for IABP-SHOCK II, p=0.65). Their discrimination performance was only modest when applied to non-acute coronary syndrome patients (0.648 vs 0.619, respectively, p=0.31). Calibration was acceptable for both scores (Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.22 for the CardShock and 0.68 for IABP-SHOCK II). In our cohort, both the CardShock and the IABP-SHOCK II risk scores were good predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome-related cardiogenic shock. | |
dc.description.department | Depto. de Medicina | |
dc.description.faculty | Fac. de Medicina | |
dc.description.refereed | TRUE | |
dc.description.status | pub | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rivas-Lasarte M, Sans-Roselló J, Collado-Lledó E, González-Fernández V, Noriega FJ, Hernández-Pérez FJ, Fernández-Martínez J, Ariza A, Lidón RM, Viana-Tejedor A, Segovia-Cubero J, Harjola VP, Lassus J, Thiele H, Sionis A. External validation and comparison of the CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II risk scores in real-world cardiogenic shock patients. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Jan 31:2048872619895230. doi: 10.1177/2048872619895230 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/2048872619895230 | |
dc.identifier.essn | 2048-8734 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2048-8726 | |
dc.identifier.officialurl | https://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/article/10/1/16/6145500?login=true | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32004078 | |
dc.identifier.relatedurl | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32004078/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/100821 | |
dc.issue.number | 1 | |
dc.journal.title | European Heart Journal – Acute CardioVascular Care | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.page.final | 24 | |
dc.page.initial | 16 | |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
dc.rights.accessRights | restricted access | |
dc.subject.cdu | 616.12 | |
dc.subject.keyword | Cardiogenic shock | |
dc.subject.keyword | Mortality | |
dc.subject.keyword | Acute coronary syndrome | |
dc.subject.keyword | Prognosis | |
dc.subject.keyword | Scores | |
dc.subject.ucm | Ciencias Biomédicas | |
dc.subject.unesco | 32 Ciencias Médicas | |
dc.title | External validation and comparison of the CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II risk scores in real-world cardiogenic shock patients | |
dc.type | journal article | |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | |
dc.volume.number | 10 | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 796635b3-1e3c-41b3-b33c-e1acb2477a48 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 796635b3-1e3c-41b3-b33c-e1acb2477a48 |
Download
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Validación del CARD SHOCK EHJ ACC 2020.pdf
- Size:
- 539.51 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format