Research Ideas for the Journal of Informatics and Data Mining: Opinion
Loading...
Download
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2015
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Citation
Box, G.E.P., and N.R. Draper (1987), Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley, New York.
Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2015a), “Bibliometric rankings of journals based on the Thomson Reuters citations database”, Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 4, 120-125.
Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2015b), “Quality weighted citations versus total citations in finance and accounting”, to appear in Managerial Finance.
Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011a), “Great expectatrics: Great papers, great journals, great econometrics”, Econometric Reviews, 30(6), 583-619.
Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011b), “What makes a great journal great in the sciences? Which came first, the chicken or the egg?”, Scientometrics, 87(1), 17-40.
Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014), Journal Citation Reports, Essential Science Indicators, Thomson Reuters.
Abstract
The purpose of this Opinion article is to discuss some ideas that might lead to papers that are suitable for publication in the Journal of Informatics and Data Mining. The suggestions include the analysis of citations databases, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored – By Even The Authors), model specification and testing, pre-test bias and data mining, international rankings of academic journals based on citations, international rankings of academic institutions based on citations and other factors, and case studies in numerous disciplines in the sciences and social sciences.
Description
For financial and research support, the author is grateful to the Australian Research Council and the National Science Council of Taiwan.