An Educational, Exercise and Occupational Therapy-Based Telerehabilitation Program versus ‘Wait-and-See’ for Improving Self-Perceived Exertion in Patients with post-COVID Fatigue and Dyspnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citation
Calvo-Paniagua, J., Díaz-Arribas, M. J., Valera-Calero, J. A., Ramos-Sánchez, M., Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C., Navarro-Santana, M. J., ... & Plaza-Manzano, G. (2024). An Educational, Exercise and Occupational Therapy-Based Telerehabilitation Program versus ‘Wait-and-See’for Improving Self-Perceived Exertion in Patients with post-COVID Fatigue and Dyspnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 10-1097.
Abstract
Objective
To compare the effectiveness of a tele-rehabilitation exercise program versus ‘wait-and-see’ on physical exertion, quality of life, dyspnea severity, heart rate and oxygen saturation in patients with post-COVID fatigue and dyspnea.
Design
Sixty-four patients were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial. A tele-rehabilitation program based on patient education, physical activity, airway clearing, and breathing exercise interventions was conducted. Self-perceived physical exertion during daily living activities, dyspnea severity, health-related quality of life and physiological outcomes and the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) were assessed at baseline, after the program and at 1- and 3-months follow-up periods.
Results
The experimental group experienced greater improvements in self-perceived physical exertion during daily living activities, dyspnea severity, health-related quality of life and 6MWT (all, p < 0.001). Additionally, patients undergoing the tele-rehabilitation program reported lower exertion scores at rest and after the 6MWT (both, p < 0.001). Between-group oxygen saturation differences were found at rest (p < 0.001), but not after the 6MWT (p = 0.024). Finally, significant between-group differences were found for heart rate after the 6MWT (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Although both groups showed a significant improvement after 3 months of follow-up, the group receiving the tele-rehabilitation program described a greater improvement compared with the group receiving no intervention.












