Accuracy of tuberculosis diagnostic tests in small ruminants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorRoy, A.
dc.contributor.authorInfantes Lorenzo, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorDe La Cruz Conty, María Luisa
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Rodríguez, Lucas José
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Sánchez, Julio
dc.contributor.authorBezos Garrido, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-18T09:56:00Z
dc.date.available2025-08-18T09:56:00Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractTuberculosis (TB) in small ruminants is a neglected disease despite its major impact on goat and sheep production and the global public health. The awareness of the role of small ruminants in the epidemiology of animal TB has increased in the last two decades, however, there is a lack of standardization of procedures and robust quantitative estimates on the accuracy of diagnostic TB tests in the scientific literature. To address this knowledge gap, all the available information regarding the use of ante-mortem diagnostic techniques in small ruminants was collected and summarized through a systematic review process. Furthermore, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to separately estimate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of cell-based tests among the retrieved studies in goats. Studies included in the meta-analysis were also evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in systematic reviews adapted for animal diagnostic tests (VETQUADAS). Median pooled Se estimates of the single intradermal tuberculin (SIT) test (ranged from 0.51 to 0.59), the comparative intradermal tuberculin (CIT) test (ranged from 0.30 to 0.50) and the interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) (ranged from 0.66 to 0.72) were lower than that reported previously in cattle, regardless the interpretation criteria and the reporting of MAP infection or vaccination. However, the specificity was adequate for all the tests (ranged from 0.95 to 0.99), except for the SIT test in MAP vaccinated herds (ranged from 0.78 to 0.90). This study provides an overview of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for TB in goats, however, the considerable between-study heterogeneity found hampered the conclusive interpretation of the pooled Se and Sp estimates. Therefore, further studies in small ruminants are necessary to optimize the diagnostic Se, which could help to design effective control strategies, accelerate the eradication of TB in these species and harmonize test procedures.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Sanidad Animal
dc.description.facultyCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET)
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationRoy, A., Infantes-Lorenzo, J. A., de la Cruz, M. L., Domínguez, L., Álvarez, J., & Bezos, J. (2020). Accuracy of tuberculosis diagnostic tests in small ruminants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive veterinary medicine, 182, 105102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105102
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105102
dc.identifier.essn1873-1716
dc.identifier.issn0167-5877
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105102
dc.identifier.pmid32739695
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/123172
dc.issue.number105102
dc.journal.titlePreventive Veterinary Medicine
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final12
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.projectIDD
dc.relation.projectIDDI15-08110
dc.relation.projectIDRYC-2016-20422
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.cdu579.62
dc.subject.keywordTuberculosis
dc.subject.keywordSmall ruminants
dc.subject.keywordDiagnostic tests
dc.subject.keywordSystematic review
dc.subject.keywordMeta-analysis
dc.subject.keywordAccuracy
dc.subject.ucmMicrobiología (Veterinaria)
dc.subject.unesco3109 Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.unesco3109.05 Microbiología
dc.titleAccuracy of tuberculosis diagnostic tests in small ruminants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dc.volume.number182
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication60e41318-75fd-45d7-9411-3c60787b6d72
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0f3bd4f7-73bb-4239-96f9-66c3da609ff5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5d5c3513-e6d9-451a-ba7d-ba0634c84bcf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7a0cfc93-a3f1-45bf-b529-403f216cf8f7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2e80b9e6-3809-4756-9ef8-ebc9ce005eb8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0f3bd4f7-73bb-4239-96f9-66c3da609ff5

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0167587720301458-main.pdf
Size:
1.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections