Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Comparison of different bread types: chemical and physical parameters

dc.contributor.authorCarocho, Márcio
dc.contributor.authorMorales Gómez, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorCiudad Mulero, María
dc.contributor.authorFernández Ruiz, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorHeleno, Sandrina
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Paula
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Lillian
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Isabel Cristina Fernandes Rodrigues
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-12T11:41:45Z
dc.date.available2024-01-12T11:41:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractIn this work, the chemical and physical profile of 5 different bread types (Multicereal bread, Bavaria wheat bread, Wholemeal bread, Rye and Oat bread) were analysed in depth, namely the nutritional profile, individual fatty acids and soluble sugars through GC-FID and HPLC-RI, respectively, as well as the mineral profile, including micro and macroelements. Furthermore, a texture profile analysis was carried out in addition to the measurement of the crust colour. Each bread type showed a distinct profile, with Wholemeal and Bavaria having the lowest calories, and Oat the highest. Multicereal showed the highest amount of unsaturated fatty acids, while Wholemeal and Rye scored the least sodium amounts. The hardest bread was Rye and the easiest to chew were Oat and Bavaria breads. The latter was also the one with the darkest crumb of all the analysed breads. This work shows that bread can be baked to meet the needs and particularities of various kinds of diets.en
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos
dc.description.facultyFac. de Farmacia
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnología (Portugal)
dc.description.sponsorshipFederación Española de Enfermedades Raras
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationCarocho M, Morales P, Ciudad-Mulero M, Fernández-Ruiz V, Ferreira E, Heleno S, et al. Comparison of different bread types: Chemical and physical parameters. Food Chemistry 2020;310:125954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125954.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2019.125954
dc.identifier.essn1873-7072
dc.identifier.issn0308-8146
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2019.125954
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/92761
dc.journal.titleFood Chemistry
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial125954
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UID/AGR/00690/2019
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/TRANSCoLAB 0612_TRANS_CO_LAB_2_P. L.
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.keywordBread
dc.subject.keywordNutritional profile
dc.subject.keywordChemical composition
dc.subject.keywordTexture
dc.subject.keywordMineral analysis
dc.subject.ucmTecnología de los alimentos
dc.subject.unesco3309 Tecnología de Los Alimentos
dc.titleComparison of different bread types: chemical and physical parameters
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number310
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa28b2a5d-9fb3-497a-8758-6d2c73bce854
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9a51078a-06a2-41bd-8362-3fe4fe5ad21e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8c733796-4d13-487b-88bb-a5074e0c82b9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya28b2a5d-9fb3-497a-8758-6d2c73bce854

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Different_bread_types.pdf
Size:
330.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections