Are teachers prepared for the anthropocene? Climate–vegetation integration in science teacher education across 26 countries

dc.contributor.authorPiñar-Fuentes, Jose Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCano Ortiz, Ana
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Ramírez, Luisiana
dc.contributor.authorCano, Eusebio
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-12T14:43:46Z
dc.date.available2026-01-12T14:43:46Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.descriptionReferencias bibliográficas: • Akheel, S. A. (2025). Guardrails for large language models: A review of techniques and challenges. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science, 3(1), 2504–2512. https://doi.org/10.51219/jaimld/syed-arham-akheel/536. • Albright, J., & St John, E. P. (2023). Higher education in post-neoliberal times: Building human capabilities in the emergent period of uncertainty. Education Sciences 13(5), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI13050500. • Álvarez-García, O., Sureda-Negre, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2017). Evaluación de las competencias ambientales del profesorado de primaria en formación inicial: Estudio de caso. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias. Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 36(1), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2338. • Bangay, C., & Blum, N. (2010). Education responses to climate change and quality: Two parts of the same agenda? International Journal of Educational Development, 30(4), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2009.11.011. • Bevacqua, E., Schleussner, C. F., & Zscheischler, J. (2025). A year above 1.5 °C signals that Earth is most probably within the 20-year period that will reach the Paris Agreement limit. Nature Climate Change, 15(3), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41558-025- 02246-9. • Cano-Ortiz, A., Musarella, C. M., Fuentes, J. C. P., Gomes, C. J. P., Del Rio, S., Canas, R. Q., & Cano, E. (2018). Analysis of the conservation of central american mangroves using the phytosociological method. In Mangrove Ecosystem Ecology and Function. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78947. • Cano-Ortiz, A., Piñar Fuentes, J. C., & Cano, E. (2021). Didactics of natural sciences in higher Secondary education. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 8(10), 6–10. • Cano-Ortiz, A., Piñar Fuentes, J. C., & Cano, E. (2021, September 29–30). Proposals for the learning of plant diversity. 5th International Virtual Conference on Educational Research and Innovation–CIVINEDU, Madrid, Spain. • Cano-Ortiz, A., Piñar Fuentes, J. C., Ighbareyeh, J. M. H., Quinto Canas, R., & Cano, E. (2021). Aspectos didácticos en la enseñanza de conceptos geobotánicos. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 8(4), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0804022. • Cano-Ortiz, A., Piñar Fuentes, J. C., Quinto Canas, R. J., Pinto Gomes, C. J., & Cano, E. (2021). Analysis of the relationship between bioclimatology and sustainable development. In C. Bevilacqua, F. Calabrò, & L. Della Spina (Eds.), New metropolitan perspectives (NMP 2020—Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 178). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_120. • Cano-Ortiz, A., Musarella, C. M., Piñar Fuentes, J. C., Quinto-Canas, R., Igbareyeh, J., Astrid Laface, V. L., & Cano, E. (2022). The teaching of environmental sciences in secondary education, high school and university to fight against climate change. In F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina, & M. J. Piñeira Mantiñán (Eds.), New metropolitan perspectives (NMP 2022—Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 482). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06825-6_162. • Cano-Ortiz, A., Quinto Canas, R., Carlos Piñar Fuentes, J., del Río, S., Gomes, J. P., & Eusebio Cano, C. (2022). Endemic hemicryptophyte grasslands of the high mountains of the Caribbean. Research Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31586/rjees.2022.184. • Cano-Ortiz, A. , Musarella, C. M., Piñar Fuentes, J., Quinto Canas, R. & Cano, E. (2022). Botanical education for vocational training students and primary and secondary teacher. Research Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31586/rjees.2022.183. • Cano-Ortiz, A., Piñar-Fuentes, J. C., Musarella, C. M., & Peña-Martínez, J. (2025). Education for environmental sustainability component: Innovative strategies for experiential learning in natural contexts. Education Sciences, 15(6), 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI15060697. • Cebrián, G., & Junyent, M. (2014). Competencias profesionales en educación para la sostenibilidad: Un estudio exploratorio de la visión de futuros maestros. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 32(1), 29–49 https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.877. • Corpuz, A. M., San Andres, T. C., & Lagasca, J. M. (2022). Integration of Environmental Education (EE) in teacher education programs: Toward sustainable curriculum. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 80(1), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.119. de Raadt, A., Warrens, M. J., Bosker, R. J., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2021). A comparison of reliability coefficients for ordinal rating scales. Journal of Classification, 38(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00357-021-09386-5. • Dong, Y., Mu, R., Jin, G., Qi, Y., Hu, J., Zhao, X., Meng, J., Ruan, W., & Huang, X. (2024). Building guardrails for large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01822. • Evans, R. S., McGregor, H. E., & Reed, B. (2024). Pedagogical principles for encouraging (socially just) youth climate action: A schema for citizenship education curriculum analysis. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 20(3), 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979241289280. FAO. (2022). • FAO strategy on climate change 2022–2031. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome. • Gal, A. (2024). Fostering positive engagement: Climate change and environmental activism in the sixth-grade classroom. Environmental Education Research, 30(12), 2272–2290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2369804. • Gamboa-Bernal, G. A. (2022). Cumbre del Cambio climático 2021: Más escepticismo que compromisos. Persona y Bioética, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5294/PEBI.2022.26.1.1. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 56 26 of 27 https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010056 • Gazzetta Ufficiale. (n.d.). Law 20 August 2019, n. 92. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2019/08/21/19G00105/sg (accessed on 23 September 2025). • González Gaudiano, E. J., & Meira Cartea, P. Á . (2020). Educación para el cambio climático: ¿Educar sobre el clima o para el cambio? Perfiles Educativos, 42(168), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.168.59464. • Grazziotin, L. S., Klaus, V., & Pereira, A. P. M. (2022). Documentary historical analysis and bibliographic research: Study subjects and methodology. Pro-Posições, 33, e20200141. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-6248-2020-0141. • Hershey, D. R. (1996). A historical perspective on problems in botany teaching. American Biology Teacher, 58(6), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450174. • Ikendi, S. (2022). Ecological conservation, biodiversity, and agricultural education as integrated approaches for envisioning the future of sustainable agriculture in North America. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2127032 • Jones, G. (2019, November 6). Italy to make climate change study compulsory in schools. World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/11/italy-to-make-climate-change-study-compulsory-in-schools/ (accessed on 16 September 2025 ). • Lee, H., Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinner, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P., Trisos, C., Romero, J., Aldunce, P., & Barret, K. (2023). IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, H. Lee, & J. Romero, Eds.). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). • Leimbach, T., & Milstein, T. (2022). Learning to change: Climate action pedagogy. Australian Journal of Adult Learning 62(3), 414–423. • Lennan, M., & Morgera, E. (2022). The Glasgow climate conference (COP26). The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 37(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-BJA10083. • Liffiton, M., Sheese, B., Savelka, J., & Denny, P. (2023, November 13–18). CodeHelp: Using large language models with guardrails for scalable support in programming classes. Koli Calling ‘23: 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli, Finland. https://doi.org/10.1145/3631802.3631830. • Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/AOMS/1177730491. • Marzi, G., Balzano, M., & Marchiori, D. (2024). K-Alpha Calculator–Krippendorff’s Alpha Calculator: A user-friendly tool for computing Krippendorff’s Alpha inter-rater reliability coefficient. MethodsX, 12, 102545. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEX.2023.102545. • McCowan, T. (2023). The climate crisis as a driver for pedagogical renewal in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(5), 933–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2197113. • McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031. • Ministerio de Educación Pública de Costa Rica. (2020). Política y plan de acción de educación para el desarrollo sostenible 2020–2025. Ministerio de Educación Pública de Costa Rica. Available online: https://observatoriomesoamerica.minambiente.gov.co/obsmesoamerica/medios/Costa%20Rica/Pol%C3%ADtica%20y%20Plan%20de%20Acci%C3%B3n%20EDS.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2025 ). • Mochel, F. R., Ribeiro, P. C., & Correa, J. N. (2013). Environmental education games for mangrove restoration and protection involving global changing scenarios. Developing environmental education games for protection of mangrove ecosystems. Proceedings of 7th WEEC Niche, 7, 512-523. • Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842. • Morote, Á. F., Sebastiá-Álcaraz, R., Ferrero-Punzano, S. M., Miguel-Revilla, D., Moreno-Vera, J. R., Rodríguez-Pizzinato, L. A., & García, Ó. J. (2025). Climate change, education, training, and perception of pre-service teachers. Social Sciences 14(4), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOCSCI14040236. • Morrow, R. (2023, December 16). La botánica debería enseñarse más ampliamente en las escuelas para promover la concientización sobre el cambio climático. Meteored. Available online: https://www.meteored.mx/noticias/actualidad/la-botanica-deberia-ensenarse-mas-ampliamente-en-las-escuelas-para-promover-la-concienciacion-sobre-el-cambio-climatico.html (accessed on 20 September 2025). • OECD. (2015). Future of education and skills 2030/2040. OECD. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/about/projects/future-ofeducation-and-skills-2030.html#faq (accessed on 20 September 2025). • OECD. (2019). An OECD learning framework 2030. In G. Bast, E. G. Carayannis, & D. F. J. Campbell (Eds.), The future of education and labor (pp. 23–35). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26068-2_3. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 56 27 of 27 https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010056 • ONU. (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: La agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible. Naciones Unidas. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/es/2030agenda (accessed on 20 September 2025). • Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind. On education, environment and human prospect. Island Press. • Parmesan, C., Root, T. L., & Willig, M. R. (2000). Impacts of extreme weather and climate on terrestrial biota. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81(3), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)0812.3.CO;2. • Parry, S., & Metzger, E. (2023). Barriers to learning for sustainability: A teacher perspective. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S42055-022-00050-3. • Parveva, T., Birch, P., Horváth, A., Piedrafita Tremosa, S., & Sigalas, E. (2024). Aprendizaje para la sostenibilidad en Europa—Creando competencias y apoyo a docentes y centros educativos (P. Birch, Ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2797/521213. • Pe’er, S., Goldman, D., & Yavetz, B. (2007). Environmental literacy in teacher training: Attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior of beginning students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.1.45-59. • Pinheiro, S., Torres, A. C., Pereira, B., Malafaia, C., & Menezes, I. (2024). Citizenship education to promote the participation of young people in climate adaptation: Crossing curricular boundaries through community profiling. Curriculum Perspectives, 44(4), 501– 512. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41297-024-00231-4. • Piñar-Fuentes, J. C., Peña-Martínez, J., & Cano-Ortiz, A. (2024). Integrating thermo-ombroclimatic indicators into sustainable olive management: A pathway for innovation and education. Agriculture, 14(12), 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRICULTURE14122112. • Quinto-Canas, R., Cano-Ortiz, A., Raposo, M., Piñar Fuentes, J. C., Cano, E., Barbosa, N., & Pinto Gomes, C. J. (2021). Cork oak vegetation series of southwestern Iberian peninsula: Diversity and ecosystem services. In C. Bevilacqua, F. Calabrò, & L. Della Spina (Eds.), New metropolitan perspectives (NMP 2020—Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 178). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_119. • Schleicher, A., Ikeda, M., Thorn, W., & Tremblay, K. (2021). OECD studies and the case of PISA, PIAAC, and TALIS (pp. 1–42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38298-8_17-1. • Shek, D. T. L., Chau, G. C. C., & Lee, B. M. (2025). Development of 21st-century skills: A comprehensive analysis based on the OECD learning compass 2030. Quality of Life in Asia, 17, 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0251-3_4. • Stagg, B. C., & Dillon, J. (2022). Plant awareness is linked to plant relevance: A review of educational and ethnobiological literature (1998–2020). Plants, People, Planet, 4(6), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/PPP3.10323. • Stagg, B. C., & Dillon, J. (2023). Plants, education and sustainability: Rethinking the teaching of botany in school science. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 941–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2264617. • Tang, K. H. D. (2022). A model of behavioral climate change education for higher educational institutions. Environmental Advances, 9, 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVADV.2022.100305. UNESCO. (2021a). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. • UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722. UNESCO. (2021b). Teachers have their say motivation, skills and opportunities to teach education for sustainable development and global citizenship. • UNESCO. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379914 (accessed on 22 December 2025). UNESCO. (2021c). La UNESCO advierte que solo la mitad de los planes de estudio. • UNESCO. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/es/articles/la-unesco-advierte-que-solo-la-mitad-de-los-planes-de-estudio-nacionales-en-todo-elmundo-hacen (accessed on 15 September 2025). • UNESCO. (2023). Education for sustainable development. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education (accessed on 15 September 2025). • Varela-Losada, M., Vega-Marcote, P., Pérez-Rodríguez, U., & Álvarez-Lires, M. (2016). Going to action? A literature review on educational proposals in formal environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 22(3), 390–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1101751. • Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (1999). Preventing plant blindness. The American Biology Teacher, 61(2), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/44506
dc.description.abstractThis study examines how climate change and vegetation are integrated into teacher education curricula across 26 countries, addressing a critical gap in understanding how future teachers are prepared to respond to the climate and biodiversity crises. To evaluate curricular integration systematically, we developed and validated the Climate and Vegetation Curriculum Integration Index (CCVI), which measures four dimensions: climate change, vegetation, links between the two, and pedagogical strategies. Content analysis of 70 official curriculum documents was conducted, with high inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.72–0.85) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.89) confirming the robustness of the instrument. Results show that integration remains partial and uneven: climate change content is more common than biodiversity, while vegetation is often marginalized, perpetuating the phenomenon of “plant blindness.” Exemplary cases in Finland, Germany, Mexico, Norway, and Switzerland demonstrate that high levels of integration are achievable, but intra-country variability often exceeds cross-country differences, highlighting the influence of institutional design. The study concludes that teacher education worldwide is not yet aligned with the urgency of global sustainability challenges. The CCVI provides a practical tool for benchmarking progress and guiding reforms, underscoring the need to embed sustainability as a core element of teacher preparation to foster ecological literacy, resilience, and civic engagement.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales , Sociales y Matemáticas
dc.description.facultyFac. de Educación
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationPiñar-Fuentes, J. C., Cano-Ortiz, A., Rodríguez Ramírez, L., & Cano, E. (2026). Are Teachers Prepared for the Anthropocene? Climate–Vegetation Integration in Science Teacher Education Across 26 Countries. Education Sciences, 16(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010056
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/educsci16010056
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010056
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/16/1/56
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/129907
dc.issue.number1
dc.journal.titleEducation sciences
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute - MDPI
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu37
dc.subject.cdu37.013
dc.subject.cdu3
dc.subject.cdu37.091.214
dc.subject.cdu37.016
dc.subject.cdu331.36
dc.subject.cdu371.12.011.3
dc.subject.cdu502.131.1
dc.subject.cdu37.012
dc.subject.keywordCurriculum analysis
dc.subject.keywordTeacher training programs
dc.subject.keywordEducation for Sustainable Development (ESD)
dc.subject.keywordPedagogical strategies
dc.subject.keywordComparative education
dc.subject.ucmCiencias Sociales
dc.subject.ucmPedagogía
dc.subject.ucmEducación
dc.subject.ucmMétodos de investigación en educación
dc.subject.ucmCurriculum escolar
dc.subject.unesco58 Pedagogía
dc.subject.unesco5803 Preparación y Empleo de Profesores
dc.subject.unesco5312.04 Educación
dc.subject.unesco5801 Teoría y Métodos Educativos
dc.titleAre teachers prepared for the anthropocene? Climate–vegetation integration in science teacher education across 26 countries
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number16
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication173c66c2-2eac-42e5-9c4b-cbb5245dd98c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery173c66c2-2eac-42e5-9c4b-cbb5245dd98c

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Are Teachers Prepared for the Anthropocene.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections