Historia, lenguaje y circunstancia: un diálogo de la nueva filología con la historia conceptual
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2022
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
Citation
Balaguer García, Esmeralda. «Historia, lenguaje y circunstancia. Un diálogo de la Nueva Filología con la Historia Conceptual». Daimon, n.o 94, enero de 2025, pp. 175-88. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.526981
Abstract
El objetivo de este artículo es el de establecer un diálogo entre la reforma filológica que el filósofo José Ortega y Gasset propone en su obra, denominada “nueva filología”, y la metodología que establece la historia conceptual de Reinhart Koselleck para el análisis de la semántica de los conceptos en sus contextos. La tesis que se sostiene es que la nueva filología de Ortega en tanto que técnica de la razón histórica supone un precedente, a veces directo y otras indirecto, de la Begriffsgeschichte.
The aim of this article is to establish a dialogue between the philological reform proposed by the philosopher José Ortega y Gasset in his books, called “new philology”, and the methodology established by Reinhart Koselleck’s conceptual history for analysing the semantics of concepts in their contexts. The thesis is that Ortega’s new philology as a technique of historical reason is a precedent, sometimes direct and sometimes indirect, of the Begriffsgeschichte.
The aim of this article is to establish a dialogue between the philological reform proposed by the philosopher José Ortega y Gasset in his books, called “new philology”, and the methodology established by Reinhart Koselleck’s conceptual history for analysing the semantics of concepts in their contexts. The thesis is that Ortega’s new philology as a technique of historical reason is a precedent, sometimes direct and sometimes indirect, of the Begriffsgeschichte.