Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Between consensus and conflict: schools and parents negotiating the educational trajectories of students at risk of early school leaving

dc.contributor.authorCurrán Fábregas, Marta
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-27T12:57:32Z
dc.date.available2024-11-27T12:57:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionReferencias bibliográficas: • Citas Ball, S. (2003). Class strategies and the education market: the middle classes and social advantages. London: Routledge. • Bonizzoni, P., Romito, M., & Cavallo, C. (2014). Teachers’ guidance, family participation and track choice: the educational disadvantage of immigrant students in Italy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.982860 • Bourdieu, P. (1977). La Reproducción. Elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza. Madrid: Editorial. • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). Interest, habitus, rationality. In P. Bourdieu, & L. J. D. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 115-139). Cambridge, England: Polity Press. • Carmona, C. A. (2021). Desajustes entre las percepciones familiares y docentes sobre la implicación parental. Un estudio etnográfico en la educación secundaria obligatoria. Recerca. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi, 26(2), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/recerca.5750 • Carmona, C. A. (2019). La educación secundaria y el distanciamiento familiar de la escuela. Un análisis longitudinal. Papers, 105(4), 487-510. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2696 • Collet, J., & Olmedo, A. (2021). The Need for a Critical School-Family Policy Analysis Perspective in the Spanish School Reform Framework. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1701 • Collet, J. (2020). Les relacions entre l’escola i les famílies des d’una perspectiva democràtica: eixos d’anàlisi i propostes per a l’equitat. Educar, 56(1), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1012 • Collet, J. (2015). What do families of the «professional and managerial class» educate their children for?. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2), 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.814531 • Churchill, H., & Clarke, K. (2010). Investing in Parenting Education: A Critical Review of Policy and Provision in England. Social Policy and Society, 9(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746409990182 • Crozier, G. (2000). Parents and Schools. Trentham: Stoke. • Crozier, G., & Davies, J. (2007). Hard to reach parents or hard to reach schools? A discussion of home-school relations, with particular reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani parents. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243578 • Davies, S., & Rizk, J. (2018). The Three Generations of Cultural Capital research: A Narrative Review. Review of Educational Research, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317748423 • Diamond, J. B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2004.35.1.75 • Dumais, S. A. (2002). Cultural Capital, Gender, and School Success: The Role of Habitus. American Sociological Association, 75(1), 44-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090253 • Dunne, M., & Gazeley, L. (2008). Teachers, social class and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(5), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690802263627 • Epstein, J., & Dauber, S. L. (1991). School Programs and Teacher Practices of Parent Involvement in Inner-City Elementary and Middle Schools. The Elementary School Journal, 91(3), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1086/461656 • Feitó, R. (2011). Los retos de la participación escolar. Madrid: Morata. • Feu, J., Simó, N., Serra, C., & Canimas, J. (2018). Dimensiones, características e indicadores para una escuela democrática. Estudios Pedagógicos, 42(3), 449-465. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052016000400024 • Gewirtz, S., & Cribb, A. (2002) Plural conceptions of social justice: implications for policy sociology. Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 499-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930210158285 • Gillborn, D., & Mirza, H. (2000). Education inequality: Mapping race, class and gender. A synthesis of research evidence. Office for Standards in Education. • Gillies, V. (2005). Raising the ‘Meritocracy’ Parenting and the Individualization of Social Class. Sociology, 39(5), 835-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505058368 • Gillies, V. (2006). Working-class mothers and school life: exploring the role of emotional capital. Gender and Education, 18(3), 281-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250600667876 • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine. • Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty. Cambridge MA: Harvard University. • Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112583 • Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University. • Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural Capital in Educational Research: A Critical Assessment Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32(5), 567-606. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004951.04408.b0 • Lee, J. S., & Bowen, N. K. (2006). Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002193 • López, N., & Tedesco, J.C. (2002). Las Condiciones de Educabilidad de los niños y adolescentes en América Latina. Buenos Aires: IIPE-UNESCO. • Mahar, C. (1990). Pierre Bourdieu: the intellectual project. In R. Harker, C. Mahar, and C. Wilkes (Eds.), An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu: the practice of theory. London: MacMillan. • McDonough, P. (1996). Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and School Structure Opportunity New York: State Univ. • Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2004). Parent Participation in Disadvantaged Schools: Moving beyond Attributions of Blame. Australian Journal of Education, 48(3), 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410404800305 • Morelli, G., Quinn, N., Chaudhary, N., Vicedo, M., Rosabal-Coto, M., Keller, H., Murray, M., Gottlieb, A., Scheidecker, G., & Takada, A. (2018). Ethical Challenges of Parenting Interventions in Low- to Middle-Income Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117746241 • Nowotny, H. (1981). Women in Public life in Austria. In C. Fuchs Epstein, and R. Laub Coser (Eds.), Access to Power: Cross-National Studies of Women and Elites. London: George All. • Ong-Dean, C., Daly, A., & Park, V. (2011). Privileged advocates: Disability and education policy in the US, Policy Futures in Education, 9(3), 392-405. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.3.392 • Quadlin, N. (2015). When children affect parents: Children’s academic per¬formance and parental investment. Social Science Research, 52, 671-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.10.007 • Reay, D. (1998). ’Always knowing’ and ‘never being sure’: familial and institutional habituses and higher education choice. Journal of Education Policy, 13(4), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093980130405 • Reay, D. (2004). Gendering Bourdieu’s concepts of capitals? Emotional capital, women and social class. The Sociological Review, 52, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00524.x • Reay, D. (2010). From the theory of practice to the practice of theory: working with Bourdieu in research in higher education choice. In E. Silva, and A. Warde (Eds.), Cultural analysis and Bourdieu’s legacy: settling accounts and developing alternatives. New York: Routledge. • Reay, D., David, M., & Ball, S. (2001). Making the difference? Institutional Habituses and Higher Education. Sociological Research online, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.548 • Rodrígo, M. J., Máiquez, M. L., y Martín, J. C. (2010). Parentalidad positiva y políticas locales de apoyo a las familias. Orientaciones para favorecer el ejercicio de las responsabilidades parentales desde las corporaciones locales. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social y Federación Española de municipios y provincias. https://www.observatoriodelainfancia.es/ficherosoia/documentos/2938_d_ParentalidadPOsitivaFEMP_2010.pdf • Rujas Martínez-Novillo, J. (2016). Cómo juzga la escuela a las familias. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, 9(3), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.7203/RASE.9.3.8986 • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. • Tarabini, A., Curran, M., Montes, A., & Parcerisa, L. (2018). Can educational engagement prevent Early School Leaving? Unpacking the school’s effect on educational success. Educational Studies, 45(8), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1446327 • Tarabini, A., Curran, M., & Fontdevila, C. (2016). Institutional habitus in context: implementation development and impacts in two compulsory secondary schools in Barcelona. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(8), 1177-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1251306 • Tyack, D., & Tobin, B. (1994). The grammar of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change?. American Educational Research Journal, XXXI, 435-479. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003453 • van Houtte, M. (2015). Lower-track students’ sense of academic futility: Selection or effect?. Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783315600802 • van Zanten, A. (2007). Reflexividad y elección de la escuela por los padres de la clase media en Francia. Revista de Antropología Social, 16, 245-278. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RASO/article/view/RASO0707110245A • Vincent C., & Maxwell, C. (2015). Parenting priorities and pres¬sures: Furthering understanding of concerted cultivation. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of edu¬cation, 37(2), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1014880 • Vincent, C., & Tomlinson, S. (1997). Home-School Relationships: 'the swarming of disciplinary mechanisms'? British Educational Research Association, 23(3), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230308 • Vincent, C., & Ball, S. (2007). `Making Up’ the Middle-Class Child: Families, Activities and Class Dispositions. Sociology, 41(6), 1061-1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507082315 • Wells, A. S., & Serna, I. (1996). The Politics of Culture: Understanding Local Political Resistance to Detracking in Racially Mixed Schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.274848214743t373
dc.description.abstractThere is a vast amount of literature which locates the home-school relationship as a keystone to improving academic outcomes and preventing school dropouts. It is not always sufficiently clear, however, how these relationships are established and function and how they impact on students’ school engagement. This paper draws on the concepts of familial habitus and institutional habitus to better understand how home-school relationships are formed and how they are deeply class-biased. Using in-depth qualitative interviews with parents and teachers from four public secondary schools in Barcelona, this paper examines the factors explaining more and less harmonious relations between these two agents. This article will help shed light on the challenging relation between home and schools, taking into account different sociocultural contexts mediating this interaction and suggesting some implications in terms of educational policy from a social justice perspective.
dc.description.abstractEs abundante la literatura que sitúa la relación familia-escuela como un factor clave en la mejora del rendimiento académico y la prevención del fracaso escolar. Lo que no queda suficientemente claro es, sin embargo, de qué modo tienen lugar estas interacciones y cómo impactan en la vinculación escolar de los y las jóvenes. Desde una aproximación bourdiesana, esta investigación hace uso de los conceptos de habitus familiar y el habitus institucional con el propósito de explorar cómo se construyen las relaciones familia-escuela y de qué modo estas interacciones están fuertemente sesgadas desde una perspectiva de la clase social. A partir de un estudio cualitativo basado en entrevistas en profundidad a profesorado y familias de 4 institutos públicos de Barcelona, el artículo analiza los factores que explican relaciones más o menos armoniosas entre ambos agentes. Los resultados de este artículo contribuyen a arrojar luz sobre la desafiante relación entre familia y escuela, teniendo en cuenta diferentes contextos socioculturales que condicionan dicha interacción y sugiriendo algunas implicaciones en términos de política educativa desde una perspectiva de la justicia social.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Sociología Aplicada
dc.description.facultyFac. de Educación
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationCurran Fàbregas, M. (2022). Between consensus and conflict: Schools and parents negotiating the educational trajectories of students at risk of early school leaving. RES. Revista Española de Sociología, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.22325/FES/RES.2022.119
dc.identifier.doi10.22325/fes/res.2022.119
dc.identifier.essn2445-0367
dc.identifier.issn1578-2824
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2022.119
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://produccioncientifica.ucm.es/documentos/62bbd46267c03c648d59d458
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8491916
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/res/index
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/111137
dc.issue.number3
dc.journal.titleRES. Revista Española de Sociología
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final18
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherFederación Española de Sociología
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu37.015.3
dc.subject.cdu37.064.1
dc.subject.cdu37.015.4
dc.subject.cdu37.015:316
dc.subject.cdu37.091.212.8
dc.subject.keywordHome-school relationships
dc.subject.keywordFamilial habitus
dc.subject.keywordInstitutional habitus
dc.subject.keywordEarly school leaving
dc.subject.keywordEducational trajectories
dc.subject.keywordRelaciones hogar-escuela
dc.subject.keywordHábito familiar
dc.subject.keywordHábitos institucionales
dc.subject.keywordAbandono escolar
dc.subject.keywordTrayectorias educativas
dc.subject.ucmSociología
dc.subject.ucmFamilia (Sociología)
dc.subject.ucmSociología de la educación (Sociología)
dc.subject.ucmPsicología de la educación (Psicología)
dc.subject.ucmEducación
dc.subject.unesco63 Sociología
dc.subject.unesco6306.05 Sociología de la Educación
dc.subject.unesco58 Pedagogía
dc.subject.unesco6104 Psicopedagogía
dc.titleBetween consensus and conflict: schools and parents negotiating the educational trajectories of students at risk of early school leaving
dc.title.alternativeEntre el consenso y el conflicto: escuelas y familias negociando trayectorias educativas de jóvenes en riesgo de abandono escolar prematuro
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number31
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationec256802-b827-4a23-8610-fef0d1990226
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryec256802-b827-4a23-8610-fef0d1990226

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2200_Curran (2022) between conflict and consensus.pdf
Size:
237.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections