Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Antibiotic removal processes from water & wastewater for the protection of the aquatic environment - a review

dc.contributor.authorSagaseta de Ilurdoz Cortadellas, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorSadhwani, J. Jaime
dc.contributor.authorReboso, J. Vaswani
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:18:41Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:18:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-10
dc.descriptionCRUE-CSIC (Acuerdos Transformativos 2021)
dc.description.abstractCurrently the serious problem of contamination by antibiotics is a reality. The scientific evidence of its negative effects on the aquatic environment and human health are numerous and unquestionable. Therefore, it is essential to intensify research into effective and efficient processes for removing antibiotics from the aquatic environment. In this paper, on the one hand, a review of the concentrations detected in all types of waters of some antibiotics is developed. In concrete of Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Erythromycin (ERY), Levofloxacin (LEV), Metronidazole (MET), Norfloxacin (NOR), Ofloxacin (OFL), Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and Trimethoprim (TIM). Of the publications consulted, it can be noted that the most detected is SMX, while those with the highest concentrations are CIP, SMX and TIM. On the other hand, some of the main methods to eliminate antibiotics from the aquatic environment are defined and classified. The methods are compared, indicating their advantages and disadvantages. Combined processes are also mentioned as a good alternative. Finally, the removal percentages achieved by each method in some representative publications are detailed. In this regard, it can be said that the methods with the best elimination percentages (range 80–100%) are biological methods (Biological Aerated Filter, Anaerobic Digestion & Biological Activated Carbon Filter) and membrane technology (Nanofiltration & Reverse Osmosis). While those with the worst results (under 80%) are chemicals (Coagulation-Flocculation) and constructed wetlands (Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands).
dc.description.facultyFac. de Comercio y Turismo
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/69525
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102474
dc.identifier.issn2214-7144
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102474
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/4628
dc.journal.titleJournal of Water Process Engineering
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial102474
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subject.keywordAquatic environment
dc.subject.keywordAntibiotics
dc.subject.keywordConcentrations
dc.subject.keywordProcess
dc.subject.keywordRemoval
dc.subject.keywordReverse osmosis
dc.subject.ucmMedio ambiente natural
dc.titleAntibiotic removal processes from water & wastewater for the protection of the aquatic environment - a review
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number45
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2214714421005614-main.pdf
Size:
1.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections