Incentivos sociales/laborales a la vitrificación de óvulos ¿Mayor autonomía de las mujeres?
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2017
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Citation
Abstract
La vitrificación de los óvulos como incentivo para conciliar la vida laboral y familiar, lejos de favorecer la autonomía y libertad de las mujeres para gestionar su proyecto reproductivo y profesional, reproduce la asimetría y desigualdad entre hombres y mujeres. Primero, porque al reducir el problema al ámbito de la biología, naturaliza el origen del conflicto obviando los factores sociales; segundo, porque al enfocarlo en las mujeres, individualiza el tipo de soluciones a adoptar y, tercero, porque sustituye la acción polftica en la transformación del sistema sexo/género hegemónico, por las respuestas tecnológicas, aparentemente, neutrales y objetivas.
Ovules freezing as an incentive to reconcile work life and family, far from favor the autonomy and freedom ofthe women to manage their reproductive and professional project, recreates the asymmetry and inequality between men and women. First of ali, because by reducing the problem to the biology field, it naturalizes the origin ofthe conflict omitting social factors; second, because by focusing it on women, it individualizes the type of solutions to adopt and, third, because it replaces the political action in the transfonnation ofthe hegemonic sex/gender system, with technological answers which are apparently, unbiased and objectives.
Ovules freezing as an incentive to reconcile work life and family, far from favor the autonomy and freedom ofthe women to manage their reproductive and professional project, recreates the asymmetry and inequality between men and women. First of ali, because by reducing the problem to the biology field, it naturalizes the origin ofthe conflict omitting social factors; second, because by focusing it on women, it individualizes the type of solutions to adopt and, third, because it replaces the political action in the transfonnation ofthe hegemonic sex/gender system, with technological answers which are apparently, unbiased and objectives.