Neuroscience beliefs in education among teachers in Argentina and other Latin American countries: predictors and comparisons to experts’ perspectives
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2026
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
License
Citations
Exportar
Citation
García, M. C., Carballo-Márquez, A., Perrin, P. B., Christ, B. R., Olabarrieta-Landa, L., Grabner, C. Y. L., Arango-Lasprilla, J. C., & Vergara-Moragues, E. (2026). Neuroscience beliefs in education among teachers in Argentina and other Latin American countries: predictors and comparisons to experts’ perspectives. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TINE.2026.100279
Abstract
Background: Neuroscientific advances applied to education are often susceptible to misinterpretation by teaching professionals. However, the accuracy of neuromyths can change as neuroscientific research advances. The goals of this study were to identify teachers’ beliefs about brain functioning, as well as to examine predictors of scientifically unsupported beliefs and to examine the degree of alignment between teachers’ responses and experts’ perspectives. Method: After a review of the literature, the 58-item Neurobeliefs in Education Questionnaire (NEQ) was created and administered to nine neuroeducation experts and 1,139 teachers from Argentina and other Latin American countries (86.1% women). Results: Teachers demonstrated high variability in their beliefs about brain functioning, with only 16% of items showing strong agreement among them and 43% showing strong disagreement. In contrast, neuroeducation experts showed greater internal consensus, especially on items supported by strong scientific evidence. When comparing the two groups, 60% of items revealed disagreement, with over a third showing large discrepancies driven by higher teacher endorsement of well-established neuromyths. A regression revealed that preschool teachers and those who had received neuroscience instruction as part of their academic degrees were more likely to endorse neuromyths, while university-level educators and those with neuroscience training outside their degree programs were significantly less likely to do so. Conclusion: The results support that continuous training in neuroscience and psychology may be a protective factor against endorsement of neuromyths among teachers in Latin America.
Description
Referencias bibliográficas:
• Ferrero, M. (2020). Can Research Contribute to Improve Educational Practice? Span. J. Psychol., 2, e33, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.24
• Fernández, J.G.,Martínez-Molina, A., Vadillo, M.A., & Ferrero, M. (2025). Beyond neuromyths: Examining in-service techars´s misconceptions abou teaching and learning. Teach. Teach. Educ., 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105132
• Hook, C. J., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Neuroscience for educators: what are they seeking, and what are they finding? NeuroEthics, 6(2), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9159-3
• Jolles, J., & Jolles, D. D. (2021). On neuroeducation: Why and how to improve neuroscientific literacy in educational professionals. Front. Psychol., 12, 752151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752151
• Opre, D., Pintea, S., & Iucu, R. (2025). Pre-service teachers´ misconceptions about brain and mind-prevalence and predictors. Trends. Neurosci. Educ., 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2025.100260
• Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Front. Psychol., 3, 33784. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
• Ferrero, M., Garaizar, P., & Vadillo, M. A. (2016). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence among Spanish teachers and an exploration of cross-cultural variation. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 10, 195467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496
• Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 15(12), 817-824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002). Understanding the Brain: Towards a New Learning Science. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD.
• Torrijos-Muelas, M., González-Víllora, S., & Bodoque-Osma, A. R. (2021). The persistence of neuromyths in the educational settings: A systematic review. Front. Psychol., 11, 591923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923
• Deligiannidi, K., & Howard-Jones, P. A. (2015). The neuroscience literacy of teachers in Greece. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., 174, 3909-3915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1133
• Dündar, S., & Gündüz, N. (2016). Misconceptions regarding the brain: The neuromyths of preservice teachers. Mind. Brain Educ., 10(4), 212-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12119
• Papadatou-Pastou, M., Haliou, E., & Vlachos, F. (2017). Brain knowledge and the prevalence of neuromyths among prospective teachers in Greece. Front. Psychol., 8, 804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804
• Zhang, R., Jiang, Y., Dang, B., & Zhou, A. (2019). Neuromyths in Chinese classrooms: evidence from headmasters in an underdeveloped region of China. Front. Educ., 4, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00008
• Gleichgerrcht, E., Lira Luttges, B., Salvarezza, F., & Campos, A. L. (2015). Educational neuromyths among teachers in Latin America. Mind. Brain Educ., 9(3), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12086
• Pei, X., Howard-Jones, P. A., Zhang, S., Liu, X., & Jin, Y. (2015). Teachers’ understanding about the brain in East China. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., 174, 3681-3688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1091
• Torres, J. F. F., & Alvarado, J. C. O. (2018). [From Scientific Knowledge to Misunderstanding: Prevalence of Neuromyths among Ecuadorian Students]. Rev. Iberoam. Educ., 78(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie7813241
• Armstrong-Gallegos, S., Van Herwegen, J., & Ipinza, V. F. (2023). Neuromyths about neurodevelopmental disorders in Chilean teachers. Trends. Neurosci. Educ., 33, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2023.100218
• Ávila-Toscano, J., Vargas-Delgado, L., Oquendo-González, K., Peñaloza-Torres, A., y Escobar-Pérez, G. (2022). [Predictors of neuromyths and general knowledge about the brain in Colombian teachers]. Psychol. Soc. Educ., 14(2), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.21071/psye.v14i2.14369
• Bartoszeck, A. B., & Bartoszeck, F. K. (2012). How in-service teachers perceive neuroscience as connected to education: An exploratory study. Eur. J. Educ. Res., 1(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.1.4.301
• Bissessar, S., & Youssef, F. F. (2021). A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation. Trends. Neurosci. Educ., 23, 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155
• Hermida, M. J., Segretin, M. S., Soni García, A., & Lipina, S. J. (2016). Conceptions and misconceptions about neuroscience in preschool teachers: a study from Argentina. Educ. Res., 58(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1238585
• Jiménez Pérez, E. H., & Calzadilla-Pérez, O. O. (2021). Neuromyth prevalence in teachers at the University of Cienfuegos. Cienc. Psicol., 15(1), e-2358. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i1.2358
• Simoes, E., Foz, A., Petinati, F., Marques, A., Sato, J., Lepski, G., & Arévalo, A. (2022). Neuroscience Knowledge and Endorsement of Neuromyths among Educators: What Is the Scenario in Brazil? Brain Sci., 12(6), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060734
• Varas-Genestier, P., & Ferreira, R. A. (2017). Neuromyths among Chilean teachers: origins and predictors. Estud. Pedagóg., 43(3), 341-360. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052017000300020
• Düvel, N., Wolf, A., & Kopiez, R. (2017). Neuromyths in music education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers and students. Front. Psychol., 8, 629. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00629
• Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., & McGrath, L. M. (2017). Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Front. Psychol., 8, 1314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
• Tovazzi, A., Giovannini, S., & Basso, D. (2020). A new method for evaluating knowledge, beliefs, and neuromyths about the mind and brain among Italian teachers. Mind. Brain Educ., 14(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12249
• Vig, J., Révész, L., Kaj, M., Kälbli, K., Svraka, B., Révész-Kiszela, K., & Csányi, T. (2023). The prevalence of educational neuromyths among Hungarian pre-service teachers. J. Intell., 11(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020031
• Bailey, R. P., Madigan, D. J., Cope, E., & Nicholls, A. R. (2018). The prevalence of pseudoscientific ideas and neuromyths among sports coaches. Front. Psychol., 9, 641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00641
• Blanchette Sarrasin, J., Riopel, M., & Masson, S. (2019). Neuromyths and their origin among teachers in Quebec. Mind. Brain Educ., 13(2), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12193
• Karakus, O., Howard-Jones, P. A., & Jay, T. (2015). Primary and secondary school teachers’ knowledge and misconceptions about the brain in Turkey. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., 174, 1933-1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.858
• Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2020). Pre-service teacher education may perpetuate myths about teaching and learning. J. Educ. Teach., 46(3), 417-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1766835
• Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teach. Psychol., 42(3), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315589505
• Abad, F.J., Díez, J.O., Gil, V.P., & García, C.G. (2011). Medición en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof. Psychol.: Res. Pract., 40(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
• Ferrero, M., Hardwicke, T. E., Konstantinidis, E., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of refutation texts to correct misconceptions among educators. J. exp. psychol.: Appl., 26(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000258
• Simoes, E., Foz, A., Petinati, F., Marques, A., Sato, J., Lepski, G., & Arévalo, A. (2022). Neuroscience Knowledge and Endorsement of Neuromyths among Educators: What Is the Scenario in Brazil? Brain Sci., 12(6), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060734
• Sazaka, L. S. R., Hermida, M. J., & Ekuni, R. (2024). Where did pre-service teachers, teachers, and the general public learn neuromyths? Insights to support teacher training. Trends. Neurosci. Educ., 36, 100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2024.100235
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 22(7), 665-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
• Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. J. Teach. Educ., 41(3), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719004100307
• Prado, J. C., Díaz, M. V., Vicente, M. L. L., & Pérez-González, J. C. (2016). [Training Needs of Early Childhood and Primary School Teachers in Attention to Diversity]. Bordón: Rev. pedagog., 68(3), 23-39.
• Carsley, D., Khoury, B., & Heath, N. L. (2018). Effectiveness of mindfulness interventions for mental health in schools: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Mindfulness. (N. Y), 9, 693-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0839-2
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9780203887332
• Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Res. Sci. Educ., 49(2), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5
• Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 23(5), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690121307
• Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013). About sleep's role in memory. Physiol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00032.2012
• Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educ. Res., 18(8), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018008004
• Rato, J. R., Abreu, A. M., & Castro-Caldas, A. (2013). Neuromyths in education: What is fact and what is fiction for Portuguese teachers? Educ. Res., 55(4), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.844947
• Horvath, J. C., Donoghue, G. M., Horton, A. J., Lodge, J. M., & Hattie, J. A. (2018). On the irrelevance of neuromyths to teacher effectiveness: Comparing neuro-literacy levels amongst award-winning and non-award winning teachers. Front. Psychol., 9, 364249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01666
• Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind. Brain Educ., 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
• Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 7(5), 406-413. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1907
• Pasquinelli, E. (2012). Neuromyths: Why do they exist and persist? Mind. Brain Educ., 6 (2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01141.x
• Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science (1979), 333(6045), 959-964. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529
• Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016). Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., 18, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005
• Dehaene, S., Nakamura, K., Jobert, A., Kuroki, C., Ogawa, S., & Cohen, L. (2010). Why do children make mirror errors in reading? Neural correlates of mirror invariance in the visual word form area. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1837-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.024
• De Vries, S., Jansen, E. P., & van de Grift, W. J. (2013). Profiling teachers’ continuing professional development and the relation with their beliefs about learning and teaching. Teach. Teach. Educ., 33, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.006
• Balmaseda-Serrano, R., Fernández-Del Olmo, A., Segovia-Carmargo, G., Cruz-Cortés, M., & Mora-Teruel, F. (2025). Psychology training and its relationship with neuromyths. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., 40(3), 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-00979-x
• Ruiz-Martin, H., Portero-Tresserra, M., Martínez-Molina, A., & Ferrero, M. (2022). Tenacious educational neuromyths: prevalence among teachers and an intervention. Trends. Neurosci. Educ., 29, 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2022.100192
• Richter, E., Spitzer, M. W. H., Morgan, A., Frede, L., Weidlich, J., & Moeller, K. (2025). Large language models outperform humans in identifying neuromyths but show sycophantic behavior in applied contexts. Trends in neuroscience and education, 39, 100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2025.100255.
• Thomas, M. S., Ansari, D., & Knowland, V. C. (2019). Annual research review: Educational neuroscience: Progress and prospects. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 60(4), 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973
• Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications.
• Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015). Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 16(4), 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3924
• Newton, P.M. & Salvi, A. (2020) How Common Is Belief in the Learning Styles Neuromyth, and Does It Matter? A Pragmatic Systematic Review. Front, Educ 5:602451. https://doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.602451
• Ward, N., Paul, E., Watson, P., Cooke, G. E., Hillman, C. H., Cohen, N. J., & Barbey, A. K. (2017). Enhanced learning through multimodal training: evidence from a comprehensive cognitive, physical fitness, and neuroscience intervention. Sci. Rep., 7(1), 5808. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06237-5
• Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learn. Individ. Differ., 21(4), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007
• Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 64(1), 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
• Voss, M. W., Nagamatsu, L. S., Liu-Ambrose, T., & Kramer, A. F. (2011). Exercise, brain, and cognition across the life span. J. Appl. Physiol., 111(5), 1505-1513. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00210.2011
• Dudley, D. A., Cotton, W. G., & Peralta, L. R. (2015). Teaching approaches and strategies that promote healthy eating in primary school children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act., 12, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0182-8
• Wang, G., Grone, B., Colas, D., Appelbaum, L., & Mourrain, P. (2011). Synaptic plasticity in sleep: learning, homeostasis and disease. Trends. Neurosci., 34(9), 452-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.07.005
• Nguyen, L., & Walters, J. (2024). Benefits of nature exposure on cognitive functioning in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol., 96, 102336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102336
• Arévalo, A., Abusamra, V., & Lepski, G. (2022). How to improve neuroscience education for the public and for a multi-professional audience in different parts of the globe. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 16, 973893. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.973893