Biofilms as Bioelectric Networks. Understanding Their Response to Neural Signals
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2025
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citation
Abstract
Information processing in biological systems presupposes communication, whether
with other organisms, the environment (learning and stigmergy), or one’s past or future
selves (memory and prediction). How do individual cells (neurons, bacteria) use
communication to build emergent complex beings like brains and colonial superorganisms? How does information within a whole, such as a vertebrate animal or
biofilm, relate to the information processed by its individual components (cells)? Given
that both neurons and bacteria utilize bioelectrical signals, could this serve as a
mechanism for intercellular communication between these two entities?
Our previous studies demonstrated that bacteria respond specifically to
neurotransmitter cues. We analyzed Escherichia coli, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, and
Enterococcus faecalis, key members of the human microbiota, with the latter two
species capable of transitioning to pathogenic states. Neural-type stimuli altered
bacterial membrane potential (Vmem) without affecting growth or viability, indicating
that bacteria can depolarize or hyperpolarize in response to external signals. However,
whether biofilms—structured bacterial communities with enhanced information
processing capabilities—exhibit dynamic responses to neural signals remains
unknown.
In this study, we investigated the bioelectrical responses of bacterial biofilms to neural
stimuli. Using the Vmem-sensitive fluorescent dye thioflavin T, which indicates
hyperpolarization, we monitored 24-hour-old biofilms over three hours under confocal
microscopy, comparing untreated biofilms to those exposed to glutamate (Glu). Our
results reveal that bacterial biofilms exhibit a coordinated bioelectrical response to Glu
exposure, distinct from planktonic cultures. Unlike individual bacterial cells, which
respond independently, biofilms displayed a synchronized shift in Vmem upon
exposure to neurotransmitters, suggesting intercellular communication within the
biofilm structure.
These findings suggest that biofilms, much like neural networks, utilize dynamic and
synchronized bioelectrical signals to process external stimuli. This opens new avenues
for understanding bacterial behavior and targeting bioelectric signaling at the interface
of bacteria and neurons, particularly in systems such as the microbiota-Gut-brain axis.
Description
The BBI group would like to express its gratitude to the Spanish Ministry of Science and
Innovation for supporting this project trough a generous grant including a predoctoral FPI
fellowship (PID2023-147361NA-I00) to J. B-C, co-funded by the European Union. We
also want to express our gratitude the Complutense University of Madrid for providing the
necessary infrastructure and facilitating collaboration with the University of Turin
(UNITO). Finally, we extend our appreciation to all participants who contributed to the
development of this project.













