Is there an equivalence between measures of landscape structural and functional connectivity for plants in conservation Assessments of the Cerrado?

dc.contributor.authorIssii, Thais Martins
dc.contributor.authorPereira-Silva, Erico Fernando Lopes
dc.contributor.authorLópez de Pablo, Carlos Tomás
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Rozely Ferreira dos
dc.contributor.authorHardt, Elisa
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T08:57:29Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T08:57:29Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractLandscape connectivity can be assessed based on the physical connection (structural connectivity) or the maintenance of flow among habitats depending on the species (functional connectivity). The lack of empirical data on the dispersal capacity of species can lead to the use of simple structural measures. Comparisons between these approaches can improve decision-making processes for the conservation or restoration of habitats in fragmented landscapes, such as the Cerrado biome. This study aimed to understand the correspondence between the measures of landscape structural and functional connectivity for Cerrado plants. Three landscapes with cerradão patches in a pasture matrix were selected for the application of these metrics based on the functional connectivity of four profiles of plant dispersal capacity. The results showed divergent interpretations between the measures of landscape structural and functional connectivity, indicating that the assessment of biodiversity conservation and landscape connectivity is dependent on the set of metrics chosen. Structurally, the studied landscapes had the same number of cerradão patches but varied in optimal resource availability, isolation, heterogeneity, and aggregation. Functional connectivity was low for all profiles (based on the integral index of connectivity—IIC) and null for species with a low dispersal capacity (based on the connectance index—CONNECT), indicating that species with a medium- to long-distance dispersal capacity may be less affected by the history of losses and fragmentation of the Cerrado in the pasture matrix. The functional connectivity metrics used allowed a more robust analysis and, apparently, better reflected reality, but the lack of empirical data on dispersal capacity and the difficulty in choosing an indicator organism can limit their use in the management and planning of conservation and restoration areas.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Biológicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Brasil)
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/63650
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/land9110459
dc.identifier.issn2073-445X
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/land9110459
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/11/459
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/7706
dc.issue.number11
dc.journal.titleLand
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final21
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.projectID(88882.430853/2019-01)
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.subject.cdu574(81)
dc.subject.keywordPlant dispersal
dc.subject.keywordLandscape ecology
dc.subject.keywordLandscape metrics
dc.subject.keywordBrazilian savanna
dc.subject.keywordLandscape planning
dc.subject.ucmEcología (Biología)
dc.subject.unesco2401.06 Ecología animal
dc.titleIs there an equivalence between measures of landscape structural and functional connectivity for plants in conservation Assessments of the Cerrado?
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number9
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Martins Issi, Thais et al. 2020. Is There an Equivalence betwe.pdf
Size:
3.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections