Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Comparación entre el metamorfismo de la Cuenca de Cameros y el de la Cuenca Aurifera de Witwatersrand (Suráfrica). Implicaciones Metalogenéticas

dc.contributor.authorMantilla Figueroa, Luis Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCasquet Martín, César
dc.contributor.authorMas Mayoral, José Ramón
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T16:46:24Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T16:46:24Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.description.abstractThe Witwatersrand Coldfield (WCF) and the Cameros Basin (CB) were subjected to widespread fluid flow during metamorphism. Physical conditions reached at the thermal peaks have been estimated at 1 kb and 340°C in the case of the CB and 1-2kb and 350 ± 50°C in the WCF (i.e. subgreenschist and greenschist facies conditions). In both cases the infiltrating fluids were predominantly of deep intra-basinal and metamorphic origin and the fluid flow was focused along zones of enhanced permeability (pervasive cleavage, shear zones, fractures and bedding). Phyrophillite and chloritoid are common minerals in the internal parts of the metamorphic areas. Cold and U, accompanied by organic matter, were introduced late in the WCF; In the CB no evidence still exist of this economically important evento In the two basins, metamorphism is post-depositional, 300 to 600 Ma younger in the Archean WCF, and inmediatly subsequent in the case of the Mesozoic CB . In this case a relationship with a first stage of basin inversion seems probable. The many similarities between metamorphism in the two basins and the new model of hot migrating fluid-driven metamorphism invoked in both cases, open room for new prospecting strategies of metals of echonomic interest in the CB.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Mineralogía y Petrología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Geológicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/11556
dc.identifier.issn0213-683X
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://www.sociedadgeologica.es/publicaciones_geogaceta.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/56939
dc.journal.titleGeogaceta
dc.language.isospa
dc.page.final134
dc.page.initial131
dc.publisherSociedad Geológica de España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu552.4(234.1):552.4(236)
dc.subject.keywordMetamorphism
dc.subject.keywordSedimentary basins
dc.subject.keywordFluid flow
dc.subject.keywordWitwatersrand Cold Field
dc.subject.keywordCameros Basin.
dc.subject.ucmPetrología
dc.titleComparación entre el metamorfismo de la Cuenca de Cameros y el de la Cuenca Aurifera de Witwatersrand (Suráfrica). Implicaciones Metalogenéticas
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number25
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa4fea134-2fb2-4157-9dd1-a3d6002ba005
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc6a33f32-53b8-4e29-93e8-94d356b58a19
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc6a33f32-53b8-4e29-93e8-94d356b58a19

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mantilla_et_al_geogaceta_1999.pdf
Size:
312.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections