Theoretical and Empirical Differences Between Diagonal and Full BEKK for Risk Management

Thumbnail Image
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
Advisors (or tutors)
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Facultad de CC Económicas y Empresariales. Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
The purpose of the paper is to explore the relative biases in the estimation of the Full BEKK model as compared with the Diagonal BEKK model, which is used as a theoretical and empirical benchmark. Chang and McAleer [4] show that univariate GARCH is not a special case of multivariate GARCH, specifically, the Full BEKK model, and demonstrate that Full BEKK which, in practice, is estimated almost exclusively, has no underlying stochastic process, regularity conditions, or asymptotic properties. Diagonal BEKK (DBEKK) does not suffer from these limitations, and hence provides a suitable benchmark. We use simulated financial returns series to contrast estimates of the conditional variances and covariances from DBEKK and BEKK. The results of non-parametric tests suggest evidence of considerable bias in the Full BEKK estimates. The results of quantile regression analysis show there is a systematic relationship between the two sets of estimates as we move across the quantiles. Estimates of conditional variances from Full BEKK, relative to those from DBEKK, are lower in the left tail and higher in the right tail.
Unesco subjects
Baba, Y., R.F. Engle D. Kraft, and K.F. Kroner, (1985) Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH, unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. Berndt, E., B. Hall, R. Hall, and J Hausman, (1974) Estimation and inference in nonlinear structural models. Annals of Social Measurement, 3, 653-665. Bollerslev, T., (1986) Generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. Chang, C.L., and M. McAleer, (2017) The �ction of full BEKK, working paper, TI 2017-015/III Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. Christensen, T.M., A.S. Hurn, and K.A. Lindsay, (2008) The devil is in the detail: Hints for practical optimisation, Economic Analysis and Policy, 38, 345-368. Engle, R.F., and K.F. Kroner, (1995) Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH, Econometric Theory, 11(1), 122-150. Engle, R.J., (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom in�ation, Econometrica, 50, 987-1007. Glosten, L.R., R. Jagannathan, and D.E. Runkle, (1993) On the relation between the expected value and volatility of nominal excess return on stocks, Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779-1801. Koenker, R., and G. Bassett, (1978) Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 46, 33-50. McAleer, M., F. Chan, S. Hoti, and O, Lieberman, (2008) Generalized autoregressive conditional correlation, Econometric Theory, 24(6), 1554-1583. McAleer, M., and C. Hafner, (2014) A one line derivation of EGARCH, Econometrics, 2(2), 92- 97. McCullough, B.D., (2009) The devil is in the detail: Hints for practical optimisation: A comment, Economic Analysis and Policy, 39: 155-157. McCullough, B.D., and C.G. Renfro, (2000) Some numerical aspects of non-linear estimation, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 26 63-77. McCullough, B.D., and H. Vinod, (1999) The numerical reliability of econometric software, The Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 633- 665. Nelson, D.B., (1990) ARCH models as di�usion approximations, Journal of Econometrics, 45(1- 2), 7-38. Nelson, D.B., (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach, Econometrica, 59(2), 347-370. Tsay, R., (1987) Conditional heteroscedastic time series models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 590-604.