Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos: la descarbonización, la solidaridad con las víctimas de desastres naturales y otras finalidades de interés general que limitan los derechos individuales
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2025
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)
Citation
Abstract
La jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos de 2023 ofrece un conjunto de sentencias y decisiones mediante las que dota de un contenido medioambiental a diferentes preceptos como los que garantizan y protegen el derecho a la vida, la prohibición de los tratos inhumanos y degradantes, el derecho al respeto a la vida privada y familiar, la libertad de expresión y el derecho de propiedad. Asimismo, da cuenta de las garantías procesales contenidas en los artículos 3, 8 y, especialmente, el 6 del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos, que constituyen vías de protección fundamental del contenido sustantivo de los derechos. La presencia de lo ambiental puede detectarse especialmente en su consideración como finalidad de interés general que limita, cuando procede, el derecho fundamental.
The case law of the European Court of Human Rights in 2023 presents a set of judgments and decisions through which it gives environmental content to different precepts such as those guaranteeing and protecting the right to life, the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, the right to respect for private and family life, freedom of expression and the right to property. It also accounts for the procedural guarantees contained in Articles 3, 8 and especially 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which are fundamental means of protecting the substantive content of rights. The presence of the environmental aspect can be especially detected in its consideration as an aim of general interest that limits, when appropriate, the fundamental right
The case law of the European Court of Human Rights in 2023 presents a set of judgments and decisions through which it gives environmental content to different precepts such as those guaranteeing and protecting the right to life, the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, the right to respect for private and family life, freedom of expression and the right to property. It also accounts for the procedural guarantees contained in Articles 3, 8 and especially 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which are fundamental means of protecting the substantive content of rights. The presence of the environmental aspect can be especially detected in its consideration as an aim of general interest that limits, when appropriate, the fundamental right













