Stability and visual outcomes yielded by three intraocular trifocal lenses with same optical zone design but differing material or toricity

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPoyales Galán, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorGarzón Jiménez, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorPizarro, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCobreces, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Adolfo
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T12:28:49Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T12:28:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-10
dc.descriptionArticle first published online: September 10, 2018 Received: March 20, 2018; Accepted: July 27, 2018
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare rotational stability, centration and visual outcomes provided by three trifocal lens models that have the same optical zone design but different material, composition, and/or toricity. Methods: The study included 78 patients with symmetric bilateral intraocular lens implantation. The lenses under evaluation were trifocal intraocular lenses made of hydrophilic acrylic material: a spherical lens 26% hydrophilic acrylic (POD FineVision), a similar lens but having a toric design (POD Toric FineVision), and a trifocal lens 25% hydrophilic acrylic material (FineVision/MicroF). Moreover, the lenses share the same optical zone design. The lenses’ rotational stability and centration were measured by means of the PIOLET software, which relies on recording and image processing techniques to determine lens rotation and centration based on slit-lamp images. We also assessed patients’ visual quality by means of 25, 40, and 80 cm VA tests. Results: The best centration results were achieved with the POD Toric FineVision model, although the differences were not statistically significant. As for lens rotation, it was below 5° in all cases under study. Regarding VA, all subjects attained at least 0.3 logMAR for far distance uncorrected VA, at 80 cm VA was about 0.2 logMAR, at 40 cm it was above 0.15 logMAR, and at 25 cm it was about 0.3 logMAR for both lens types. Conclusion: All three intraocular lens models yield excellent visual results at far, near as well as intermediate distances. The POD FineVision and POD Toric FineVision models, with double C-loop design, yielded the best results centrationwise and rotation-wise. Differences had no clinical relevance.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Optometría y Visión
dc.description.facultyFac. de Óptica y Optometría
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/48993
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1120672118795065
dc.identifier.issn1120-6721
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1120672118795065
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/12226
dc.journal.titleEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSage
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu617.7-089.243
dc.subject.cdu681.73
dc.subject.keywordTrifocal
dc.subject.keywordrotation
dc.subject.keywordastigmatism
dc.subject.keywordintraocular lens
dc.subject.keywordcataract
dc.subject.ucmLentes de contacto
dc.subject.ucmÓptica oftálmica
dc.subject.ucmMateriales ópticos
dc.subject.unesco3311.11 Instrumentos ópticos
dc.subject.unesco2209.14 Propiedad ópticas de los sólidos
dc.titleStability and visual outcomes yielded by three intraocular trifocal lenses with same optical zone design but differing material or toricity
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
Download
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Nuria Garzón_EJO795065 vN-3-eprint.pdf
Size:
286.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download
Collections
Artículos