Publication: High AC/A Accommodative Esotropia Strabismus Treated with Contact Lenses: A Single Case Design (N=1) Study
Full text at PDC
Advisors (or tutors)
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose was to determine the efficacy of two types of contact lenses (spherical disposable and aplanatic) as treatment in a patient with esotropia with a high Accommodative Convergence/Accommodation Ratio (AC/A). Due to the possibility of the appearance of accommodative insufficiency in this kind of patient, (i.e., following many years of bifocal glasses use), the elimination of the plus addition lens is advisable. Nevertheless, in some patients, this change leads to the appearance of a residual angle of esodeviation in near vision. It was expected that monofocal aplanatic contact lenses could achieve, due to their optical characteristics, an accurate and orthotropic binocular alignment, without aggravating an undesirable manifestation of the accommodative insufficiency. METHODS: An experimental design of a single case (N=1) was used in which the subject acted as his own control. With bifocal glasses the subject displayed stability in his binocular and accommodative system at every distance of vision for the past three years. We compared the efficacy of two different types of hydrophilic contact lenses to control the angle of deviation, both at distance and at near vision. RESULTS: Neither of the two contact lenses produced the results of stability and the correct binocular alignment that had been achieved with bifocal glasses. This subject experienced a worse manifest esodeviation in distance vision with aplanatic lenses than with the disposable ones. CONCLUSIONS: These monofocal contact lenses did not create acceptable binocular alignment and stability in a subject with a high AC/A accommodative esotropia.
Versión preprint del artículo publicado COPYRIGHT 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,electronic or mechanical, including xerographic copy, photocopy, recording, or an information storage and retrieval system,without permission in writing from the publisher, except as specifically allowed by law (each paid subscriber may print one hard copy of each issue, for personal use only, by simply executing the “print” command on their computer/printer).
1. Prieto-Diaz J, Souza-Dias C. Estrabismo. Ediciones Cientificas Argentinas, Buenos Aires; 2005. 2. Rutstein RP, Marsh-Tootle W. Clinical course of accommodative esotropia. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75:97-102. 3. Taylor D, Hoyt CS. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 3rd ed. Elsevier Saunders, Edinburgh; 2005. 4. Chatzistefanou KE, Mills MD. The role of drug treatment in children with strabismus and amblyopia. Paediatric Drugs 2000; 2:91-100. 5. Caloroso EE, Rouse MVV. Tratamiento Clinico del Estrabismo, Butterworth-Heinemann, Madrid, Ciagami; 1999. 6. Calcutt C, Kinnear P. Anomalous accommodative response in high AC/A ratio convergence excess esotropia. Acta Estrabologica 1996; 25:57-61. 7. Calcutt C. Contact lenses in accommodative esotropia therapy. Br Orthopt J 1998; 46:59-65. 8. Rich LS, Glusman M. Tangent streak RGP bifocal contact lens in the treatment of accommodative esotropia with high AC/A ratio. CLAO J 1992; 18:56-58. 9. Morton GV, Kushner BJ, Lucchese NJ, Shapiro MB, Bredeson DC. The efficacy of SimulVue and Unilens RGP aspheric bifocal contact lenses in the treatment of esotropia associated with a high accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio. J AAPOS 1998; 2:108-112. 10. Moore B. Pediatric contact lens: Case reports. J Am Optom Assoc 1998; 69:88-113. 11. Collins FL et al. single subject research design for optometry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62:516-522. 12. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Epidemiologia Clinica. Ciencia Basica Para La Medicina clinica. Panamericana, Buenos Aires 1994. 13. Barlow DH, Hersen M. Disenos Experimentales De Case Unico. Martinez Roca, Barcelona 1988.