Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

State of the art of reservoir sedimentation management in Spain

dc.book.titleInternational Workshop and Symposium on Reservoir Sedimentation Management
dc.contributor.authorAvendaño Salas, Cándido
dc.contributor.authorSanz Montero, María Esther
dc.contributor.authorCobo Rayán, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T21:04:13Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T21:04:13Z
dc.date.issued2000-10-26
dc.description.abstractPart of the total reservoir storage capacity in Spain (56 km3) is lost due to sedimentation processes taking place. Surveys carried out in 121 reservoirs indicate that 6% of them have undergone a capacity reduction of over 50%. However, most of them (81%) are characterised by a reservoir capacity loss below 20%. The most frequent methods used to control reservoir sedimentation in Spain fall into one of the following groups: reduction of sediment yield through basin management and removal of the sediment deposits that have built up. Reduction of sediment yields includes soil and water conservation programmes, upstream sediment trapping debris dams, and bypassing of sediment. In Spain, soil and water conservation programmes, mainly those involving afforestation practices and engineering measures, have been carried out since 1877. Flushing and excavation practices are being used to remove part of the sediment build-up from some reservoirs. With regard to this, the empty flushing of the Joaquín Costa (Barasona) reservoir is highlighted, since it was the first controlled flushing undertaken in our country. Prior to the flushing, all sectors concerned in the Barasona Reservoir activities were consulted. Sediment evolution and environmental factors, such as water quality, fisheries, riparian vegetation, fauna, etc., were studied before, during and after the flushing. In general terms, the experience was found to be so satisfactory that it is being taken into consideration when planning other reservoir flushings. In Spain, all reservoirs are provided with bottom outlet(s), so that they can be subjected to flushing. This has been a deciding factor when considering regular flushing as one of the most suitable method for sedimentation control. Once the specific characteristics of each individual reservoir have been taken into consideration, regulations and standards are drawn up and applied to ensure minimum impact and the maximum accuracy of flushing operations. It is expected that this silting mitigation measure could soon be regularly applied to all reservoirs.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Mineralogía y Petrología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Geológicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/20048
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60610
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final34
dc.page.initial27
dc.page.total156
dc.publication.placeToyama, Japan
dc.publisherWater Resources Environment Technology Center-Japan (WEC)
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu551
dc.subject.keywordSediment
dc.subject.keywordControl
dc.subject.keywordReservoir
dc.subject.keywordCapacity losses
dc.subject.ucmGeología
dc.subject.unesco2506 Geología
dc.titleState of the art of reservoir sedimentation management in Spain
dc.typebook part
dcterms.referencesAvendaño, C., Cobo, R., Sanz, M.E. & Gómez, J.L. (1997): Capacity situation in Spanish reservoirs. Ninenteenth Congress on Large Dams Q. 74, R.53,849-874. Avendaño, C., Cobo, R. & Sanz, M.E. (1997a): Evaluation of suspended solids “in situ”. Application to the dredging and flushing of the Barasona reservoir. Ninenteenth Congress on Large Dams Q. 74, R.51,825-834. Alcaraz, A. & Vázquez, A. (1994): Rehabilitación de la Presa Romana de Proserpina. Ingeniería Civil, 96, 41-48. Cobo, R., Sanz, M.E., Gómez, J., Avendaño,C y Bedmar, A. (1997): Influence of the Puentes reservoir operation procedure on the sediment accumulation rate between 1954-1994. Ninenteenth Congress on Large Dams Q. 74, R.52, 835-847. Estirado, F. (1988): Política en la lucha contra la erosión. Seminario sobre la erosión: evaluación y actuaciones para su control. CEDEX. ICOLD (1989): Sedimentation Control of Reservoirs. Guidelines. Bull. 67. 159 pp. LIMNÉTICA (1998): Vaciado Total y prolongado del embalse de Barasona, v. 14 (special issue), 144 pp. López Martos, J. (1988): La lucha contra la erosión. Seminario sobre la erosión: evaluación y actuaciones para su control. CEDEX. Mahmood, K. (1987): Reservoir sedimentation. Impact, Extent and Mitigation. World Bank Technical Paper, nº 71.119 pp. Masa Sánchez, M. (1996): Control y evolución de los sedimentos en el embalse de Cubillas (Granada). V Jornadas Españolas de Presas, 223-232. Ruíz de la Torre, J. (1996): Efectos hidrológicos de los programas de conservación en España. V Jornadas Españolas de Presas. 222-231. Sanz, M.E., Avendaño, C. & Cobo, R. (1999): Influencia de los embalses en el transporte de sediementos hasta el delta del río Ebro (España). Manaus ’99. Symposium on Hydrological and Geochemical Processes in Large Scale River Basins (CDRom) Serrano, M. (1997). Sediment removing systems. Ninenteenth Congress on Large Dams Q. 74, R.31, 519-528. Solanes, J.F. & García, I. (1996): Evaluación de impacto ambiental de residuos inertes: vertedero de lodos procedentes del dragado del embalse de Valbona (Teruel).V Jornadas Españolas de Presas. 214-221.
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione6d1887e-8aef-4d40-a3d5-5b609d8bf6f6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye6d1887e-8aef-4d40-a3d5-5b609d8bf6f6

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
japonsalas.pdf
Size:
94.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format