Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Pion-pion scattering amplitude. IV. Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV

dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Martin, R.
dc.contributor.authorKamiński, Robert
dc.contributor.authorPeláez Sagredo, José Ramón
dc.contributor.authorRuiz De Elvira Carrascal, Jacobo
dc.contributor.authorYndurain, F.J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T04:02:09Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T04:02:09Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-04
dc.description©2011 American Physical Society. At the early stages of this collaboration, we suffered the devastating loss of one of the authors, F. J. Ynduraín, whose contributions were essential for this work. He was an example of humanity and scientific dedication. We also thank I. Caprini, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler for many discussions and suggestions on possible improvements of our parametrizations, as well as D. V. Bugg for comments on the S0 wave inelasticity, and B. Kubis for his comments on K3 decays. This work is partly supported by DGICYT Contracts No. FIS2006-03438 and No. FPA2005-02327, Santander/Complutense Contract No. PR27/05-13955-BSCH and the EU Integrated Infrastructure Initiative Hadron Physics Project under Contract No. RII3-CT-2004-506078.
dc.description.abstractWe improve our description of π π scattering data by imposing additional requirements on our previous fits, in the form of once-subtracted Roy-like equations, while extending our analysis up to 1100 MeV. We provide simple and ready to use parametrizations of the amplitude. In addition, we present a detailed description and derivation of these once-subtracted dispersion relations that, in the 450 to 1100 MeV region, provide an additional constraint which is much stronger than our previous requirements of forward dispersion relations and standard Roy equations. The ensuing constrained amplitudes describe the existing data with rather small uncertainties in the whole region from threshold up to 1100 MeV, while satisfying very stringent dispersive constraints. For the S0 wave, this requires an improved matching of the low and high energy parametrizations. Also for this wave we have considered the latest low energy K_(l4) decay results, including their isospin violation correction, and we have removed some controversial data points. These changes on the data translate into better determinations of threshold and subthreshold parameters which remove almost alldisagreement with previous chiral perturbation theory and Roy equation calculations below 800 MeV. Finally, our results favor the dip structure of the S0 inelasticity around the controversial 1000 MeV region.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Física Teórica
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Físicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipDGICYT
dc.description.sponsorshipSantander-Complutense
dc.description.sponsorshipEU Integrated Infrastructure Initiative Hadron Physics Project
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/35008
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/PhysRevD.83.074004
dc.identifier.issn1550-7998
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.074004
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttp://journals.aps.org
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/44832
dc.journal.titlePhysical review D
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmer Physical Soc
dc.relation.projectIDFIS2006-03438
dc.relation.projectIDFPA2005-02327
dc.relation.projectIDPR27/05-13955-BSCH
dc.relation.projectIDRII3-CT-2004-506078
dc.relation.projectIDHadron Physics (249309)
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu51-73
dc.subject.keywordPhase-sift analysis
dc.subject.keywordChiral perturbation-theory
dc.subject.keywordGev-C
dc.subject.keywordExtraordinary hadrons
dc.subject.keywordMomentum-transfer
dc.subject.keywordπ π mplitudes
dc.subject.keywordHigh statistics
dc.subject.keywordDecays
dc.subject.keywordRegion
dc.subject.keywordπ& π
dc.subject.ucmFísica-Modelos matemáticos
dc.subject.ucmFísica matemática
dc.titlePion-pion scattering amplitude. IV. Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number83
dcterms.references[1] J. R. Pelaez and F. J. Yndurain, Phys. Rev. D 71 , 074016 (2005). [2] R. Kaminski, J. R. Pelaez, and F. J. Yndurain, Phys. Rev. D 74, 014001 (2006); 74, 079903(E) (2006). [3] R. Kaminski, J. R. Pelaez, and F. J. Yndurain, Phys. Rev. D 77, 054015 (2008). [4] J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984). [5] J. R. Pelaez and F. J. Yndurain, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114001 (2004). [6] R. Garcia-Martin, J. R. Pelaez, and F. J. Yndurain, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074034 (2007). [7] L. Rosselet, P. Extermann, J. Fischer et al., Phys Rev. D 15, 574 (1977); S. Pislak et al. (BNL-E865 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 221801 (2001). [8] J. R. Batley et al. (NA48=2 Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 54, 411 (2008). [9] S. M. Roy, Phys. Lett. 36B, 353 (1971). [10] J. L. Basdevant, C. D. Froggatt, and J. L. Petersen, Phys. Lett. 41B, 178 (1972); Nucl. Phys. B72, 413 (1974); M. R. Pennington, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 92, 164 (1975). [11] G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B603, 125 (2001); B. Ananthanarayan, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rep. 353, 207 (2001). [12] R. Kaminski, L. Lesniak, and B. Loiseau, Phys. Lett. B 551, 241 (2003). [13] I. Caprini, G. Colangelo, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 132001 (2006). [14] K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010). [15] A. Dobado and J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3057 (1997); J. A. Oller and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A620, 438 (1997); Z. Y. Zhou, G. Y. Qin, P. Zhang et al., J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2005) 043; G. Mennessier, S. Narison, and W. Ochs, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 181–182, 238 (2008). [16] R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D 15, 267 (1977); AIP Conf. Proc. 964, 1 (2007); Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 168, 127 (2007). [17] M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 011601 (2006); J. A. Oller and L. Roca, Eur. Phys. J. A 37, 15 (2008); J. Bernabeu and J. Prades, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 241804 (2008); R. Kaminski, G. Mennessier, and S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B 680, 148 (2009). [18] J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 102001 (2004); J. R. Pelaez and G. Rios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 242002 (2006). [19] N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 072001 (2007). [20] J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/2 Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 635 (2010). [21] K. L. Au, D. Morgan, and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1633 (1987); D. Morgan and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D 48, 1185 (1993); B. S. Zou and D. V. Bugg, Phys. Rev. D 48, R3948 (1993); D. V. Bugg, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 45 (2006). [22] G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and A. Rusetsky, Eur. Phys. J. C 59, 777 (2008). [23] A. Aloisio et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 537, 21 (2002); V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, H. Neufeld, and A. Pich, Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 369 (2004); V. Cirigliano, C. Gatti, M. Moulson, and M. Palutan (FlaviaNet Kaon Working Group), arXiv:0807.5128. [24] O. Nachtmann and E. de Rafael, CERN Report No. TH- 1031, 1969 (unpublished); P. Pascual and F. J. Ynduraín, Nucl. Phys. B83, 362 (1974). [25] G. Colangelo, Proc. Sci., KAON (2008) 038 [arXiv:0710.3050]. [26] V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, and A. Pich, Phys. Lett. B 679, 445 (2009). [27] H. Leutwyler, AIP Conf. Proc. 892, 58 (2007). [28] We thank H. Leutwyer for this suggestion. [29] B. Hyams et al., Nucl. Phys. B64, 134 (1973); P. Estabrooks and A. D. Martin, Nucl. Phys. B79, 301 (1974); S. D. Protopopescu et al., Phys. Rev. D 7, 1279 (1973); R. Kamin´ski, L. Lesniak, and K. Rybicki, Z. Phys. C 74, 79 (1997); Eur. Phys. J. direct C 4, 1 (2002); B. Hyams et al., Nucl. Phys. B100, 205 (1975); M. J. Losty et al., Nucl. Phys. B69, 185 (1974); W. Hoogland et al., Nucl. Phys. B126, 109 (1977); N. B. Durusoy et al., Phys. Lett. 45B, 517 (1973). [30] G. Grayer et al., Nucl. Phys. B75, 189 (1974). [31] S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev. 137, B1022 (1965). [32] I. Caprini, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114019 (2008). [33] N. N. Achasov, S. A. Devyanin, and G. N. Shestakov, Z. Phys. C 22, 53 (1984); N. N. Achasov and A. V. Kiselev, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054029 (2006); 74, 059902 (2006). [34] R. Kaminski, R. Garcia-Martin, P. Grynkiewicz, J. R. Pelaez, and F. J. Yndurain, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 402 (2009). [35] R. Kaminski, R. Garcia-Martin, P. Grynkiewicz, and J. R. Pelaez, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 186, 318 (2009). [36] We thank H. Leutwyler for his comments and suggestions on this issue. [37] B. Adeva, A. Romero, and O. Vazquez Doce, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 522 (2007). [38] B. Adeva et al. (DIRAC Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 619, 50 (2005). [39] J. R. Batley et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 589 (2009); N. Cabibbo and G. Isidori, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 021; G. Colangelo et al., Phys. Lett. B 638, 187 (2006); M. Bissegger et al., Nucl. Phys. B 806, 178 (2009). [40] W. Rarita, R. J. Riddell, C. B. Chiu, and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 165, 1615 (1968); C. D. Froggatt and J. L. Petersen, Nucl. Phys. B129, 89 (1977). [41] G. Wanders, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 323 (2000). [42] R. Kaminski, arXiv:1103.0882.
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication70900239-cb8b-49f3-931f-9dc6a8b7d8d5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7f9c347a-51bd-41f0-80a7-59358aed6585
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery70900239-cb8b-49f3-931f-9dc6a8b7d8d5

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pelaezsagredo14libre.pdf
Size:
1.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections