Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorArriola Villalobos, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorAlmendral Gómez, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorGarzón Jiménez, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Medrano, J
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Perez, C
dc.contributor.authorMartínez De La Casa Fernández-Borrella, José María
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Valle, David
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T21:48:05Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T21:48:05Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-11
dc.descriptionClinical Study
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare measurements taken using a swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer (IOLmaster 700) and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar 900), and to determine the clinical impacts of differences in their measurements on intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions. Methods Eighty eyes of 80 patients scheduled to undergo cataract surgery were examined with both biometers. The measurements made using each device were axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), lens thickness (LT), mean keratometry (MK), white-to-white distance (WTW), and pupil diameter (PD). Holladay 2 and SRK/T formulas were used to calculate IOL power. Differences in measurement between the two biometers were determined using the paired t-test. Agreement was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Results Mean patient age was 76.3±6.8 years (range 59–89). Using the Lenstar, AL and PD could not be measured in 12.5 and 5.25% of eyes, respectively, while IOLMaster 700 took all measurements in all eyes. The variables CCT, AQD, LT, and MK varied significantly between the two biometers. According to ICCs, correlation between measurements made with both devices was excellent except for WTW and PD. Using the SRK/T formula, IOL power prediction based on the data from the two devices were statistically different, but differences were not clinically significant. Conclusions No clinically relevant differences were detected between the biometers in terms of their measurements and IOL power predictions. Using the IOLMaster 700, it was easier to obtain biometric measurements in eyes with less transparent ocular media or longer AL.en
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Optometría y Visión
dc.description.facultyFac. de Óptica y Optometría
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/40102
dc.identifier.citationArriola Villalobos, P., Almendral Gómez, J., Garzón Jiménez, N. et al. «Agreement and Clinical Comparison between a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Optical Biometer and an Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry Biometer». Eye, vol. 31, n.o 3, marzo de 2017, pp. 437-42. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.241.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/eye.2016.241
dc.identifier.issn0950-222X
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps//doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.241
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttp://www.nature.com/eye/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/eye2016241a.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/17554
dc.journal.titleEye
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu617.7-073.75
dc.subject.keywordOptical coherence tomography
dc.subject.keywordOptical biometer
dc.subject.keywordCentral Corneal Thickness
dc.subject.keywordLens Power Calculation
dc.subject.ucmOftalmología
dc.subject.ucmOptica (Medicina)
dc.subject.unesco3201.09 Oftalmología
dc.titleAgreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometeren
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication302adf1a-3cda-44c0-a3bd-ef3a9418d76d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
relation.isAuthorOfPublication273a99c3-2c9f-4dd0-8939-b7ff3593124c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3e2b98e5-5c02-400b-8823-90887624c010
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery302adf1a-3cda-44c0-a3bd-ef3a9418d76d
Download
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EYE 2016.pdf
Size:
392.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download
Collections
Artículos