Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2020
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Citation
Serrano-Pedraza, I., Vancleef, K., Herbert, W., Goodship, N., Woodhouse, M., & Read, J. C. A. (2020). Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function? PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226822
Abstract
Bayesian staircases are widely used in psychophysics to estimate detection thresholds.
Simulations have revealed the importance of the parameters selected for the assumed subject’s
psychometric function in enabling thresholds to be estimated with small bias and high
precision. One important parameter is the slope of the psychometric function, or equivalently
its spread. This is often held fixed, rather than estimated for individual subjects, because
much larger numbers of trials are required to estimate the spread as well as the threshold.
However, if this fixed value is wrong, the threshold estimate can be biased. Here we determine
the optimal slope to minimize bias and maximize precision when measuring stereoacuity
with Bayesian staircases. We performed 2- and 4AFC disparity detection stereo
experiments in order to measure the spread of the disparity psychometric function in human
observers assuming a Logistic function. We found a wide range, between 0.03 and 3.5 log10
arcsec, with little change with age. We then ran simulations to examine the optimal spread
using the empirical data. From our simulations and for three different experiments, we recommend
selecting assumed spread values between the percentiles 60–80% of the population
distribution of spreads (these percentiles can be extended to other type of thresholds).
For stereo thresholds, we recommend a spread around the value σ = 1.7 log10 arcsec for
2AFC (slope β = 4.3 /log10 arcsec), and around σ = 1.5 log10 arcsec for 4AFC (β = 4.9 /log10
arcsec). Finally, we compared a Bayesian procedure (ZEST using the optimal σ) with five
Bayesian procedures that are versions of ZEST-2D, Psi, and Psi-marginal. In general, for
the conditions tested, ZEST optimal σ showed the lowest threshold bias and highest
precision.