The gendered social representation of physical education and sport science higher education in Spain
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2021
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge / Taylor&Francis
Citations
Exportar
Citation
Serra, P., Rey-Cao, A., Camacho–Miñano, M. J., & Soler-Prat, S. (2021). The gendered social representation of physical education and sport science higher education in Spain. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(4), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1879768
Abstract
Background: In recent decades, Spain has seen a decline in girls’ interest in pursuing the Physical Activity and Sport Science (PASS) degree. For example, in Catalonia (Spain), the number of women enrolled has decreased from 39.3% in the 2000–2001 academic year to 17.3% in the 2014–2015 academic year (Serra, Soler, Vilanova et al. 2019), which is in line with technological and scientific degrees. This fact is striking because more women than men are enrolling in university studies in Spain overall.
Purpose: Drawing on Bourdieu's theoretical tools and the concept of social representation, the purpose of this study is to analyse how young people perceive the PASS degree, in order to understand why fewer women than men choose this degree.
Method: A total of 4146 students (50.2% girls; mean age = 16.82 years; SD = 0.837) from 39 school centres were purposefully selected in three regions of Spain. Students were enrolled in the final course of Compulsory Secondary Education (4th ESO, 16 years old) and the first of 2 years of the pre-university course (1st year of Bachillerato, 16–17 years old). An ad hoc instrument was designed to measure the Social Representation (SR) of the degree habitus and students’ interest in studying for the PASS degree. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS Statistics (v.23). Data were tested for normality. The statistical tests used were: Chi-square (X2) and Mann–Whitney U analysis.
Findings: The results show that the SR of the degree habitus has a masculine characterization, which favours the number of men who study this degree. This SR could explain why the number of women in this field has been very low (around 18%) in Spain in recent years. Likewise, this SR would be a form of symbolic violence on girls who may wish to pursue these studies, but do not feel entitled to do so because it is considered a masculine field. The students are not able to identify this social construction, which eventually naturalizes the difference and makes the prevalence of men in these studies more socially acceptable.
Conclusion: The SR of the degree habitus could be exercising a symbolic violence that would contribute to the discrepancy in the number of men and women who choose a PASS degree. To change the SR of the degree, it is necessary to substantially modify how it is constructed. Some of the options would involve a profound change in curriculum, built around a conception of body culture that is based on feminist political, philosophical, and ontological assumptions. This new construction would invoke a configuration of body culture not centred on the modern sport phenomenon and post-modern physical activity. The information that students receive to construct this masculine and instrumentalized SR of the degree should also be intentionally modified.
Description
This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [grant number DEP2012-31275]; and Institut Nacional d’Educació Física de Catalunya (INEFC) [grant number PINEFC-2012].
Referencias bibliográficas:
• Abric, Jean-Claude. 1993. “Central System, Peripheral System: Their Functions and Roles in the Dynamics of Social Representations”. Papers on Social Representations 2(2): 75-78.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. El sentido práctico [The Logic of Practice]. Madrid: Taurus.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1999. Razones prácticas: sobre la teoría de la acción [Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action]. Barcelona: Anagrama.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. La dominación masculina [Domination masculine]. Barcelona: Anagrama.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2003. El oficio de científico. Ciencia de la ciencia y reflexividad [Science of Science and Reflexivity]. Barcelona: Anagrama.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2008. Homo academicus. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
• Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc Wacquant. 2005. Una invitación a la sociología reflexiva [An invitation to reflexive sociology]. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
• Brown, David. 2005. “An Economy of Gendered Practices? Learning to Teach Physical Education from The Perspective of Pierre Bourdieu's Embodied Sociology.” Sport, Education and Society 10 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1080/135733205298785.
• Burton, Laura J. 2015. “Underrepresentation of Women in Sport Leadership: A Review of Research.” Sport Management Review 18 (2): 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.02.004.
• Chepyator-Thomson, Jepkorir Rose and Catherine D. Ennis. 1997. “Reproduction and resistance to the culture of femininity and masculinity in secondary school physical education.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 68 (1): 89-99.
• Connell, R. W., and James W. Messerschmidt. 2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender & Society 19 (6): 829–59. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639.
• Cooky, Cheryl, Michael A. Messner, and Robin H. Hextrum. 2013. “Women Play Sport, but Not on TV: A Longitudinal Study of Televised News Media.” Communication & Sport 1 (3): 203–30. doi:10.1177/2167479513476947.
• Cross, Simon, and Barbara Bagilhole. 2002. “Girls’ Jobs for the Boys? Men, Masculinity and Non-Traditional Occupations.” Gender, Work & Organization 9 (2): 204–26. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00156.
• Departament d’Universitats de la Generalitat de Catalunya. 2020. Notes de tall i places universitàries [Marks and University places]. Available at: http://universitats.gencat.cat/ca/preinscripcio/llistes_i_notes/
• Dowling, Fiona. 2008. “Getting in Touch with Our Feelings: The Emotional Geographies of Gender Relations in PETE.” Sport, Education and Society 13 (3): 247–66. doi:10.1080/13573320802200560.
• Dowling, Fiona. 2013. “Teacher Educator's Gendered Workplace Tales”. In Gender and Sport: Changes and Challenges, edited by Gertrud Pfister and Mary Kary Sisjord, 217-231. Münster: Waxmann.
• Fernández, Juan, María Ángeles Quiroga, Isabel del Olmo and Antonio Rodríguez. 2007. “Escalas de Masculinidad y Feminidad: Estado de la Cuestión”. Psicothema 19(3): 357-365.
• Fitzpatrick, Katie and Heyley McGlashan. 2016. “Rethinking ‘straight’ Pedagogy: Gender, Sexuality and PE”. In Social Justice in Physical Education: Critical Reflections and Pedagogies for Change, edited by Daniel B. Robinson and Lynn Randall, 102–121. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
• Flintoff, Anne. 1993. “Gender, Physical Education and Initial Teacher Education”. In Equality, Education and Physical Education, edited by John Evans, 184-204. London: Falmer Press.
• Garay, Beatriz, Eider Elcoroaristizabal, Maria Teresa Vizcarra Morales, Maria Prat, Pedrona Serra, and Susanna Soler. 2017. “Is there a gender bias in study programs in sciences of physical activity and sport?” Retos 34: 150-154. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i34.58846
• Gorely, Trish, Rachel Holroyd, and David Kirk. 2003. “Muscularity, the Habitus and the Social Construction of Gender: Towards a Gender-Relevant Physical Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (4): 429–48. doi:10.1080/01425690301923.
• Gutiérrez, Alicia. 2004. “Poder, hábitus y representaciones: recorrido por el concepto de violencia simbólica en Pierre Bourdieu”. Revista Complutense de Educación 15(1): 289-300. doi:10.5209/RCED.17200.
• Hay, Peter J., and lisahunter. 2006. “‘Please Mr Hay, What Are My Poss(Abilities)?’: Legitimation of Ability Through Physical Education Practices.” Sport, Education and Society 11 (3): 293–310. doi:10.1080/13573320600813481.
• Hay, Peter J., and Doune Macdonald. 2009. “Evidence for the Social Construction of Ability in Physical Education.” Sport, Education and Society 15 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/13573320903217075.
• Hills, Laura and Eileen Kennedy. 2013. “Ready, Set, Action: Representations of Coaching Through Film”. In Routledge Handbook of Sports Coaching, edited by Paul Potrac, Jim Denison and Wade Gilbert, 40-54. London: Routledge.
• Hinojosa-Alcalde, Ingrid, Ana Andrés, Pedrona Serra, Anna Vilanova, Susanna Soler, and Leanne Norman. 2017. “Understanding the Gendered Coaching Workforce in Spanish Sport.” International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 13 (4): 485–95. doi:10.1177/1747954117747744.
• Hunter, Lisa. 2004. “Bourdieu and the Social Space of the PE Class: Reproduction of Doxa through Practice.” Sport, Education and Society 9 (2): 175–92. doi:10.1080/1357332042000175863.
• Kerner, Charlotte, Leen Haerens, and David Kirk. 2017. “Understanding Body Image in Physical Education: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.” European Physical Education Review 24 (2): 255–65. doi:10.1177/1356336X17692508.
• Kirk, David and Kimberly L Oliver. 2014. “The Same Old Story: The Reproduction and Recycling of a Dominant Narrative in Research on Physical Education for girls.” Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes 116 (2): 7-22. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2014/2).116.01
• Klomsten, Anne Torhild, Herb W. Marsh, and Einar M. Skaalvik. 2005. “Adolescents’ Perceptions of Masculine and Feminine Values in Sport and Physical Education: A Study of Gender Differences.” Sex Roles 52 (9): 625–36. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3730-x.
• Larsson, Hå, Birgitta Fagrell, and Karin Redelius. 2009. “Queering Physical Education. Between Benevolence towards Girls and a Tribute to Masculinity.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 14 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.1080/17408980701345832
• LaVoi Nicole M. and Austin Stair Calhoun. 2016. “Women in sport media: Where Are the Women Coaches”. In Women in Sport Coaching, edited by Nicole M LaVoi, 163-176. New York: Routledge.
• López-Sáez, Mercedes, Susana Puertas, and Milagros Sáinz. 2011. “Why Don’t Girls Choose Technological Studies? Adolescents’ Stereotypes and Attitudes Towards Studies Related to Medicine or Engineering.” The Spanish Journal of Psychology 14 (1): 74–87. doi:10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.6.
• Macdonald, Doune, David Kirk, and Sandy Braiuka. 1999. “The Social Construction of the Physical Activity Field at the School/University Interface.” European Physical Education Review 5 (1): 31–52. doi:10.1177/1356336x990051003.
• Marttinen, Risto, Kelly Johnston, Sara B. Flory, and Brianna Meza. 2020. “Enacting a Body-Focused Curriculum with Young Girls through an Activist Approach: Leveraging the after-School Space.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, May, 1–15. doi:10.1080/17408989.2020.1761954.
• Martínez García, José Saturnino. 2017. “Habitus. An Analytic Review.” Revista Internacional de Sociología 75 (3): e074. doi: 10.3989/ris.2017.75.3.15.115
• Mau, Wei-Cheng J., and Jiaqi Li. 2018. “Factors Influencing STEM Career Aspirations of Underrepresented High School Students.” The Career Development Quarterly 66 (3): 246–58. doi:10.1002/cdq.12146.
• McCullick, Bryan, Don Belcher, Brent Hardin, and Marie Hardin. 2003. “Butches, Bullies and Buffoons: Images of Physical Education Teachers in the Movies.” Sport, Education and Society 8 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1080/1357332032000050033.
• Messner, Michael. 2012. “Reflections on Communication and Sport: On Men and Masculinities.” Communication & Sport 1 (1–2): 113–24. doi:10.1177/2167479512467977.
• Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deporte. 2019. Datos y cifras del sistema universitario español [Data and Figures from the Spanish University System]. Madrid: MECyD.
• Moscovici, Serge. 1979. El Psicoanálisis, su imagen y su público [Psychoanalysis, its Image and Its Audience]. Buenos Aires: Huemul.
• Mosteiro, Maria Josefa, and Ana Porto. 2000. “Los Motivos de Elección de Estudios en Alumnos y Alumnas de Universidad.” Innovación educativa 10: 121-132.
• Pérez López, Isaac, Enrique Rivera García, and Carmen Trigueros Cervantes. 2014. “Imaginario Social de la Educación Física Construido Desde las ‘Teen Series’ de Televisión Españolas.” Movimento 20 (3): 853-873. doi:10.22456/1982-8918.42764.
• Piñero, Silvia L. 2008. “La Teoría de las Representaciones Sociales y la Perspectiva de Pierre Bourdieu: Una Articulación Conceptual”. CPU-e, Revista de Investigación Educativa 7: 1-19.
• Serra, Pedrona, Susanna Soler, Anna Vilanova, and Ingrid Hinojosa-Alcalde. 2019. “Masculinization in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences Degree Programs.” Apunts Educación Física y Deportes 135: 9–25. doi:10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2019/1).135.01
• Serra, Pedrona, Susanna Soler, María José Camacho-Miñano, Ana Rey-Cao, and Anna Vilanova. 2019. “Gendered Career Choices: Paths Toward Studying a Degree in Physical Activity and Sport Science.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1986. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01986.
• Serra, Pedrona, Susanna Soler, Maria Prat, María Teresa Vizcarra, Beatriz Garay, and Anne Flintoff. 2018. “The (in)Visibility of Gender Knowledge in the Physical Activity and Sport Science Degree in Spain.” Sport, Education and Society 23 (4): 324–338. doi:10.1080/13573322.2016.1199016.
• Serra, Pedrona, Jaume Cantallops, Pere Palou, and Susanna Soler. 2020. “Do Gender Stereotypes Still Exist in Physical Education? The Views of Adolescent Girls.” Journal of Sport and Health Research 12(Supl 2):179-192
• Shilling, Chris. 2012. The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage.
• Sirkovská, Monika. 2014. “Cultural Capital in Research: Issues of Operationalization, Measurement and Methodological Pitfalls”. Journal of Modern Education Review 4(7): 541–554.
• Spence, Janet T., Robert Helmreich, and Joy Stapp. 1975. “Ratings of Self and Peers on Sex Role Attributes and Their Relation to Self-Esteem and Conceptions of Masculinity and Femininity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1): 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0076857.
• Subirats, Marina and Amparo Tomé. 2007. Balones fuera. Reconstruir los espacios desde la coeducación [Balls out. Rebuild spaces from coeducation]. Barcelona: Octaedro ediciones.
• Svendsen, Annemari Munk, and Jesper Tinggaard Svendsen. 2016. “Teacher or Coach? How Logics from the Field of Sports Contribute to the Construction of Knowledge in Physical Education Teacher Education Pedagogical Discourse through Educational Texts.” Sport, Education and Society 21 (5): 796–810. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.956713.
• Táboas-Pais, María Inés, and Ana Rey-Cao. 2012. “Gender Differences in Physical Education Textbooks in Spain: A Content Analysis of Photographs.” Sex Roles 67 (7): 389–402. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0174-y.
• Thorpe, Holly. 2010. “Bourdieu, Gender Reflexivity, and Physical Culture: A Case of Masculinities in the Snowboarding Field.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 34 (2): 176–214. doi:10.1177/0193723510367770.
• Walton-Fisette, Jennifer L., Theresa A. Walton-Fisette, and Laura Frances Chase. 2017. “Captured on Film: A Critical Examination of Representations of Physical Education at the Movies.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 22 (5): 536–547. doi:10.1080/17408989.2017.1294670.
• Webb, Louisa, and Doune Macdonald. 2007. “Techniques of Power in Physical Education and the Underrepresentation of Women in Leadership.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 26 (3): 279–97.
• Wright, Jan. 2002. “Physical Education Teacher Education: Sites of Progress or Resistance”. In Gender and Physical Education: Contemporary issues and future directions, edited by Dawn Penney, 190-207. London: Routledge.
• Wright, Jan, and Lisette Burrows. 2006. “Re-conceiving Ability in Physical Education: A Social Analysis”. Sport, Education and Society 11(3): 275-291. doi:10.1080/13573320600813440