La figura de la atribución de la responsabilidad establecida en el Estatuto de la Corte Penal Internacional y su compatibilidad con la Constitución de Venezuela
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2019
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Editorial Jurídica Venezolana
Citation
Abstract
Obra monográfica que estudia la atribución de la responsabilidad penal internacional de los individuos en el marco del Estatuto de Roma, con énfasis en la responsabilidad del superior (art. 28) y en las modalidades de autoría y participación (art. 25). A partir de antecedentes históricos, doctrina y jurisprudencia de tribunales penales internacionales (ad hoc, híbridos y la CPI), la autora reconstruye los elementos objetivos y subjetivos que permiten imputar conductas a quienes ejecutan, ordenan, instigan, facilitan u omiten prevenir y reprimir crímenes internacionales. El eje central es un examen sistemático de la compatibilidad de estas figuras con la Constitución y la legislación penal venezolana, identificando tensiones dogmáticas y procesales, y proponiendo criterios y vías de implementación interna del Estatuto de Roma para fortalecer la complementariedad y evitar escenarios de impunidad.
This monograph examines modes of international criminal responsibility under the Rome Statute, focusing on command/superior responsibility (Article 28) and modes of liability (Article 25). Drawing on historical development, doctrine, and case law from international criminal tribunals (ad hoc, hybrid, and the ICC), it clarifies the objective and subjective elements required to attribute liability to those who perpetrate crimes directly, as well as to those who order, instigate, facilitate, or fail to prevent and punish international crimes. Its core contribution is a structured assessment of the compatibility of Rome Statute attribution doctrines with the Venezuelan Constitution and domestic criminal law, identifying normative and procedural frictions and outlining pathways for domestic implementation aimed at strengthening complementarity and reducing impunity risks.
This monograph examines modes of international criminal responsibility under the Rome Statute, focusing on command/superior responsibility (Article 28) and modes of liability (Article 25). Drawing on historical development, doctrine, and case law from international criminal tribunals (ad hoc, hybrid, and the ICC), it clarifies the objective and subjective elements required to attribute liability to those who perpetrate crimes directly, as well as to those who order, instigate, facilitate, or fail to prevent and punish international crimes. Its core contribution is a structured assessment of the compatibility of Rome Statute attribution doctrines with the Venezuelan Constitution and domestic criminal law, identifying normative and procedural frictions and outlining pathways for domestic implementation aimed at strengthening complementarity and reducing impunity risks.








