Restricciones a los derechos de reunión y manifestación a causa de la pandemia covid en la jurisprudencia alemana
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2022
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Centro de Estudios Sociales y Jurídicos Sur de Europa
Citation
Abstract
Se expone en el trabajo cómo las medidas restrictivas de la libertad de reunión y manifestación durante la pandemia no han llegado en la doctrina ni en la jurisprudencia alemana a delimitar o distinguir el ámbito de protección de estos dos derechos cuando las reuniones son al aire libre. En la jurisprudencia y la doctrina española, tampoco han servido estas restricciones de derechos para elaborar una adecuada delimitación entre “fuerte limitación” y “suspensión” de los derechos fundamentales. Más aún, en la jurisprudencia constitucional española sigue siendo una cuestión abierta las relaciones entre los convocantes de la reunión (o los organizadores de la manifestación), las fuerzas de orden público y los participantes en la reunión o manifestación.
The paper exposes how the restrictive measures on freedom of assembly and demonstration during the pandemic have not come to the point of delimiting or distinguishing the scope of protection of these two rights in German doctrine or jurisprudence when the meetings are outdoors. In Spanish jurisprudence and doctrine, these restrictions on rights have not served to draw up an adequate delimitation between “strong limitation” and “suspension” of fundamental rights either. Furthermore, in Spanish constitutional jurisprudence, the relationships between the conveners of the meeting (or the organizers of the demonstration), the public order forces and the participants in the meeting or demonstration remain an open question.
The paper exposes how the restrictive measures on freedom of assembly and demonstration during the pandemic have not come to the point of delimiting or distinguishing the scope of protection of these two rights in German doctrine or jurisprudence when the meetings are outdoors. In Spanish jurisprudence and doctrine, these restrictions on rights have not served to draw up an adequate delimitation between “strong limitation” and “suspension” of fundamental rights either. Furthermore, in Spanish constitutional jurisprudence, the relationships between the conveners of the meeting (or the organizers of the demonstration), the public order forces and the participants in the meeting or demonstration remain an open question.