Attitudes of Spanish-speaking veterinarians interested in anaesthesia towards use of total intravenous anaesthesia in dogs: a survey study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Full text at PDC

Publication date

2021

Advisors (or tutors)

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
Citations
Google Scholar

Citation

Bustamante, R., Ortiz-Díez, G., Canfrán, S., Gómez de Segura, I. A., & Aguado, D. (2021). Attitudes of Spanish-speaking veterinarians interested in anaesthesia towards use of total intravenous anaesthesia in dogs: a survey study. Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, 48(3), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2020.10.011

Abstract

Objectives: To describe Spanish-speaking veterinary anaesthetists' attitudes towards use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in dogs. Study design: Prospective online voluntary survey. Population: Data from 300 answered surveys. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent via e-mail to representatives of the four largest Spanish-speaking veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia associations. It was distributed through mailing lists (Spain, Argentina, Mexico) or social media (Spain, Chile) to gather information on the use, opinions and perceived advantages of TIVA, as well as on preferred alternatives to isoflurane for providing general anaesthesia. Logistic regression was used to test for response associations. Results: A total of 275 (92%) respondents had used TIVA (24% rarely, 36% sometimes, 40% very often or always). There was an association between a higher rate of TIVA usage and a low specialization level, less clinical experience and unavailability of anaesthetic gas scavenging systems. The main reasons for not using TIVA were lack of familiarity with the technique (92%), unavailability of infusion pumps (32%), established institutional anaesthetic protocol (32%), and technical difficulty (20%). Among frequent TIVA users, a higher proportion reported the greater ease of TIVA use (52%) compared to those that did not perceive such benefit (17%) [odds ratio (OR) = 5.2; 95% confidence interval (CI95), 1.7-16.6; p = 0.004). More respondents did not consider TIVA more expensive (60%) (OR = 2.1; CI95, 1.0-4.3; p = 0.034), more difficult to perform (59%) (OR = 2.5; CI95, 1.3-4.9; p = 0.006) or to manage the equipment (53%) (OR = 3.3; CI95, 1.4-7.8; p = 0.008), than inhalational anaesthetics. During isoflurane shortages, respondents reportedly preferred using an alternative inhalational agent (59%) rather than TIVA (47%). Conclusions and clinical relevance: TIVA use is widespread among veterinarians within the surveyed associations. Frequent TIVA users reported greater perceived advantages. In situations of isoflurane shortage, an alternative inhalational anaesthetic was preferred over TIVA.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Contribución de autores: RB: questionnaire design, data management, statistical analysis and preparation of the drafted and final versions of the manuscript. GOD: statistical analysis and critical revision of the manuscript. IAGS: revision of questionnaire design and critical revision of the manuscript. SC: supervision of the drafted and final versions of the manuscript. DA: conception and design of the study, revision of questionnaire design, supervision of the drafted article and preparation of the final version of the manuscript Becas/Contratos: Rocío Bustamante: CT45/15 - CT46/15

Unesco subjects

Keywords

Collections