Ecological and intrinsic drivers of foraging parameters ofEurasian lynx at a continental scale
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
British Ecological Society
Citation
Oliveira, T., Mattisson, J., Vogt, K., Linnell, J., Odden, J., Oeser, J., Premier, J., Rodríguez-Recio, M., Belotti, E., Bufka, L., Černe, R., Duľa, M., Fležar, U., Gonev, A., Herdtfelder, M., Heurich, M., Hočevar, L., Hvala, T., Iľko, T., … Krofel, M. (2025). Ecological and intrinsic drivers of foraging parameters of Eurasian lynx at a continental scale. Journal of Animal Ecology, 94, 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2656.14228
Abstract
The estimation of foraging parameters is fundamental for understanding predator ecology. Predation and feeding can vary with multiple factors, such as prey availability, presence of kleptoparasites and human disturbance. However, our knowledge is mostly limited to local scales, which prevents studying effects of environmental factors across larger ecological gradients. Here, we compared inter-kill intervals and handling times of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) across a large latitudinal gradient, from subarctic to the Mediterranean ecosystems, using a standardised dataset of predicted adult ungulate kills from 107 GPS-collared lynx from nine distinct populations in Europe. We analysed variations in these two foraging parameters in relation to proxies reflecting prey availability, scavengers' presence and human disturbance, to improve our understanding of lynx predation at a continental scale. We found that inter-kill intervals and handling times varied between populations, social status and in different seasons within the year. We observed marked differences in inter-kill intervals between populations, which do not appear to be driven by variation in handling time. Increases in habitat productivity (expressed by NDVI, used as a proxy for prey availability) resulted in reduced inter-kill intervals (i.e. higher kill rates). We observed less variation in handling (i.e. feeding) times, although presence of dominant scavengers (wild boars and brown bears) and higher human impact led to significantly shorter handling times. This suggests that kleptoparasitism and human disturbance may limit the energetic input that lynx can obtain from their prey. We also observed that the human impact on foraging parameters can be consistent between some populations but context-dependent for others, suggesting local adaptations by lynx. Our study highlights the value of large-scale studies based on standardised datasets, which can aid the implementation of effective management measures, as patterns observed in one area might not be necessarily transferable to other regions. Our results also indicate the high degree of adaptability of these solitary felids, which enables them to meet their energy requirements and persist across a wide range of environmental conditions despite the constraints imposed by humans, dominant scavengers and variable prey availability.
Description
This study was financed by the European Commission (project LIFE Lynx LIFE16 NAT/SL/000634 and LIFE Luchs LIFE13 NAT/DE/000755); by the Research Council of Norway (Norges Forskningsråd (grants no. 251112 and 281092), NINA basic funding project no. 160022/F40), the Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management (Miljødirektoratet), the Nature Protection Division of the County Governor's Office for Innlandet, Viken, Vestfold and Telemark, & Trøndelag County; by the charity foundation from Liechtenstein, hunting inspectorate of the Canton of Bern, Stotzer-Kästli-Stiftung, Zigerli-Hegi-Stiftung, Haldimann-Stiftung, Zürcher Tierschutz, Temperatio-Stiftung, Karl Mayer Stiftung, Stiftung Ormella; by the Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic. Data curation was supported by the Regina Bauer Stiftung. TO was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, grant no. SFRH/BD/144110/2019). MKr was supported by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (grants no. N1-0163 and J1-50013). JKu was supported by Bernd Thies Foundation, Plitvice Lakes NP and Public Institution ‘Priroda’. MKut and MD were supported by the Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic (Project No. CZ.05.4.27/0.0/0.0/20_139/0012815), by the SaveGREEN project supported by Interreg Danube Transnational Programme (No. DTP3-314-2.3), the Dean's office of the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno and Training Forest Enterprise Masaryk Forest Křtiny. JP was supported by a grant from the Riepe Foundation.