Soil Microbial Response to Cover Crop Termination Methods under Two Water Levels

dc.contributor.authorCenturión, Nelly
dc.contributor.authorUlcuango, Kelly
dc.contributor.authorNavas Vásquez, Mariela
dc.contributor.authorMariscal-Sancho, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorMoliner, Ana
dc.contributor.authorHontoria, Chiquinquirá
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T14:57:49Z
dc.date.available2024-01-30T14:57:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-29
dc.description.abstractCover crops (CC) promote soil health, but the termination method can condition the benefits for soil microorganisms. In a greenhouse experiment, we evaluated the legacy effects of four common CC termination methods on mycorrhization, soil microbial abundance, structure, and activity, as well as other soil properties, and its interaction with water levels (well-watered and water deficit). Mowing and residue incorporation (INC), glyphosate (GLY), roller crimper (ROL) and glyphosate + roller crimper (RGL) were evaluated, together with no CC, at two sampling dates of a subsequent maize. The water level modulated the soil microbial response to CC termination methods, especially in the glyphosate methods. Legacy effects on soil microbial attributes were notable and evolved differently from maize, from pre-emergence to ~3 months later. At final sampling, INC showed the best microbial response at both water levels, enhancing most microbial attributes. ROL was the second most beneficial method, especially in well-watered soil, promoting fungi but nullifying the CC positive effect on bacteria. Regardless of water level, GLY and RGL showed a similar microbial response. In well-watered soil, GLY and RGL had a negative effect on the total fungi, which separated the RGL response from the ROL. Overall, the time since CC termination and water level modulated the soil microbial response to the termination methods. Further research is needed to investigate CC termination impacts under different environmental conditions, in order to better understand the processes involved and provide farm-level recommendations.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Química en Ciencias Farmacéuticas
dc.description.facultyFac. de Farmacia
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación(España)
dc.description.sponsorshipComunidad Autónoma de Madrid
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Social Fund
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationCenturión, N. Ulcuango K., Navas, M., Mariscal-Sancho, I., Ibáñez, M., Moliner A., Hontoria, C. 2022. Soil Microbial Response to Cover Crop Termination Methods under Two Water Levels. Agronomy
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy12123002
dc.identifier.issn2073-4395
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/96620
dc.issue.number12
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial3002
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AGL2017-83283-C2-1-R
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AGRISOST-CM S2018/BAA-4330
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordglyphosate
dc.subject.keywordroller crimper
dc.subject.keywordincorporation
dc.subject.keywordmycorrhizal fungi
dc.subject.keywordqPCR
dc.subject.ucmEdafología (Farmacia)
dc.subject.unesco2511.02 Biología de Suelos
dc.titleSoil Microbial Response to Cover Crop Termination Methods under Two Water Levels
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number12
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022.Centurion et al 2022.agronomy-12-03002.pdf
Size:
956.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections