Telematic strategies in nutrition science
dc.contributor.advisor | Cuadrado Vives, María del Carmen | |
dc.contributor.author | Carballo-Casla, Adrián | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-17T15:02:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-17T15:02:43Z | |
dc.date.defense | 2018-06-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06-02 | |
dc.degree.title | Grado en Nutrición Humana y Dietética | |
dc.description.abstract | FUNDAMENTS: there is a growing number of scientific papers which study nutritional interventions delivered via telematic means, due to its potential for achieving a broad reach and a reduced relative cost. OBJECTIVES: to analyze the approach, characteristics and efficacy of the different telematic interventions by which, thanks to dietetics and nutrition, it’s possible to improve population’s, patients’’ or individuals’ health. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a search was conducted through the PubMed and Web of Science databases, to find systematic reviews and meta-analysis, published in first quartile journals between 2010 and 2017, which study aims combined dietetics or nutrition with telematics. 21 papers were included, with a total number of 147 study arms, which main data were systematically extracted and combined into a quantitative analysis. RESULTS: a) Telematic interventions are perceived as useful and acceptable. Moreover, they show efficacy in improving lifestyle-related parameters, but not anthropometric parameters. The evidence that they can produce changes over clinical or biochemical parameters is very limited. b) There doesn’t seem to be efficacy differences between telematic and not telematic interventions. Strategies that combine telematic and face-to-face components appear to obtain better results. c) Characteristics such as interactivity, tailoring or the use of theories and models for its design seem to be associated with interventions’ success. | |
dc.description.abstract | FUNDAMENTO: existe un número creciente de publicaciones científicas que estudian las intervenciones nutricionales llevadas a cabo por medios telemáticos, debido a su potencial para lograr un amplio alcance y un coste relativo reducido. OBJETIVOS: analizar el planteamiento, características y efectividad de las distintas intervenciones telemáticas mediante las que, gracias a la alimentación y a la nutrición, es posible tratar de mejorar la salud de poblaciones, pacientes o individuos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se llevó a cabo una búsqueda en las bases de datos Pubmed y Web of Science para hallar revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis, publicados en revistas del primer cuartil entre 2010 y 2017, cuyos objetos de estudio combinaran la dietética o la nutrición y la telemática. Se incluyeron 21 artículos, con un total de 147 ramas de estudio, cuyos datos principales se extrajeron sistemáticamente y fueron combinados en un análisis cuantitativo. RESULTADOS: a) Las intervenciones telemáticas son percibidas como útiles y aceptables. Además, muestran efectividad a la hora de mejorar parámetros relacionados con el estilo de vida, pero no sobre parámetros antropométricos. La evidencia de que pueden producir cambios sobre parámetros clínicos o bioquímicos es muy limitada. b) No parece haber diferencias significativas de eficacia entre las intervenciones no telemáticas y las telemáticas. Las estrategias que combinan un componente telemático con otro presencial, parecen obtener mejores resultados. c) Características como la interactividad, la personalización o la utilización de teorías y modelos para su diseño, parecen estar asociadas con el éxito de las intervenciones. | |
dc.description.department | Depto. de Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos | |
dc.description.faculty | Fac. de Farmacia | |
dc.description.refereed | FALSE | |
dc.description.status | unpub | |
dc.eprint.id | https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/57413 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/15259 | |
dc.language.iso | spa | |
dc.page.total | 75 | |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | |
dc.subject.cdu | 612.39 | |
dc.subject.keyword | Review Literature | |
dc.subject.keyword | Mobile Health | |
dc.subject.keyword | Telehealth | |
dc.subject.keyword | eHealth | |
dc.subject.keyword | mHealth | |
dc.subject.keyword | Acceptability of Health Care | |
dc.subject.keyword | Healthy Lifestyles | |
dc.subject.keyword | Diet | |
dc.subject.keyword | Food intake | |
dc.subject.keyword | Nutritional Food Quality | |
dc.subject.keyword | Nutrition Science | |
dc.subject.keyword | Body Composition | |
dc.subject.keyword | Body Weights and Measures | |
dc.subject.keyword | Interactive Media | |
dc.subject.keyword | Community Health. | |
dc.subject.keyword | Revisión de la Literatura | |
dc.subject.keyword | Salud Móvil | |
dc.subject.keyword | Telesalud | |
dc.subject.keyword | e-Salud | |
dc.subject.keyword | m-Salud | |
dc.subject.keyword | Aceptabilidad de la Asistencia Sanitaria | |
dc.subject.keyword | Estilos de Vida Saludables | |
dc.subject.keyword | Dieta | |
dc.subject.keyword | Consumo de Alimentos | |
dc.subject.keyword | Calidad Nutricional de los Alimentos | |
dc.subject.keyword | Ciencia de la Nutrición | |
dc.subject.keyword | Composición Corporal | |
dc.subject.keyword | Pesos y Medidas Corporales | |
dc.subject.keyword | Medios de Comunicación Interactivos | |
dc.subject.keyword | Salud Comunitaria. | |
dc.subject.ucm | Dietética y nutrición (Medicina) | |
dc.subject.ucm | Informática médica y telemedicina | |
dc.subject.ucm | Salud pública (Medicina) | |
dc.subject.ucm | Ciberpsicología | |
dc.subject.ucm | Motivación | |
dc.subject.ucm | Nutrición | |
dc.subject.ucm | Educación sanitaria | |
dc.subject.ucm | Dietética | |
dc.subject.ucm | Dietética y nutrición (Farmacia) | |
dc.subject.ucm | Salud pública (Farmacia) | |
dc.subject.unesco | 3206 Ciencias de la Nutrición | |
dc.subject.unesco | 3212 Salud Pública | |
dc.subject.unesco | 6106.08 Motivación | |
dc.subject.unesco | 3206 Ciencias de la Nutrición | |
dc.subject.unesco | 3212 Salud Pública | |
dc.title | Telematic strategies in nutrition science | |
dc.title.alternative | Estrategias telemáticas en nutrición | |
dc.type | bachelor thesis | |
dcterms.references | 1. Broekhuizen K, Kroeze W, van Poppel MNM, Oenema A, Brug J. A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Computer-Tailored Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior Promotion Programs: an Update. Ann Behav Med. 2012 July; 44 (2): p. 259-286. 2. Real Academia Española. Diccionario de la lengua española. Vigesimotercera ed. 2014. 3. Schippers M, Adam PCG, Smolenski DJ, Wong HTH, de Wit JBF. A meta-analysis of overall effects of weight loss interventions delivered via mobile phones and effect size differences according to delivery mode, personal contact, and intervention intensity and duration. Obes Rev. 2017 February; 18 (4): p. 450-459. 4. ITU Plenipotentiary Conference. Key ICT indicators for developed and developing countries and the world (totals and penetration rates). International Telecommunications Union; 2017. 5. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine. Pubmed [Online]; 2004 [cited 2017 November. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=online+nutrition. 6. Larrocha ER. Características de la sociedad de la información. In Nuevas tendencias en los sistemas de información. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces; 2017. p. 21-22. 7. The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009 July; 6 (7) 8. De León E, Fuentes LW, Cohen JE. Characterizing Periodic Messaging Interventions Across Health Behaviors and Media: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2014 March; 16 (3) 9. Maher CA, Lewis LK, Ferrar K, Marshall S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Are Health Behavior Change Interventions That Use Online Social Networks Effective? A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2014 February; 16 (2) 10. Goode AD, Reeves MMEEG. Telephone-Delivered Interventions for Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior Change: an Updated Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2012 January; 42 (1): p. 81-88. 11. Mack I, Bayer C, Schäffeler N, Reiband N, Brölz E, Zurstiege G, et al. Chances and Limitations of Video Games in the Fight against Childhood Obesity—A Systematic Review. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017 July; 25 (4): p. 237-267. 12. Ajie WN, Chapman-Novakofski KM. Impact of Computer-Mediated, Obesity-Related Nutrition Education Interventions for Adolescents: A Systematic Review. J Adolesc Health. 2014 June; 54 (6): p. 631-645. 13. Semper HM, Povey R, Clark-Carter D. A systematic review of the effectiveness of smartphone applications that encourage dietary self-regulatory strategies for weight loss in overweight and obese adults. Obes Rev. 2016 September; 17 (9): p. 895-906. 14. Arambepola C, Ricci-Cabello I, Manikavasagam P, Roberts N, French DP, Farmer A. The Impact of Automated Brief Messages Promoting Lifestyle Changes Delivered Via Mobile Devices to People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res. 2016 April; 18 (4) 15. Goode AD, Lawler SP, Brakenridge CL, Reeves MM, Eakin EG. Telephone, print, and Web-based interventions for physical activity, diet, and weight control among cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2015 March; (9): p. 660-682. 16. Covolo L, Ceretti E, Moneda M, Castaldi S, Gelatti U. Does evidence support the use of mobile phone apps as a driver for promoting healthy lifestyles from a public health perspective? A systematic review of Randomized Control Trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 December; 100 (12): p. 2231–2243. 17. Hamel LM, Robbins LB. Computer- and web-based interventions to promote healthy eating among children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2012 July; 69 (1): p. 16-30. 18. Hammersley ML, Jones RA, Okely AD. Parent-Focused Childhood and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity eHealth Interventions:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016 July; 18 (7) 19. Oosterveen E, Tzelepis F, Ashton L, Hutchesson MJ. A systematic review of eHealth behavioral interventions targeting smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity and/or obesity for young adults. Prev Med. 2017 January; (99): p. 197-206. 20. Wang Y, Xue H, Huang Y, Huang L, Zhang D. A Systematic Review of Application and Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Obesity and Diabetes Treatment and Self-Management. Adv Nutr. 2017 May; (8): p. 449-462. 21. Hwa Lee S, Nurmatov UB, Nwaru BI, M M, Grant L, Pagliari C. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low– and middle–income countries: Systematic review and meta–analysis. J Glob Health. 2016 June; 6 (1) 22. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The Effectiveness of Mobile-Health Technology-Based Health Behaviour Change or Disease Management Interventions for Health Care Consumers: A Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2013 January; 10 (1) 23. Neyeloff JL, Fuchs SC, Moreira LB. Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2012 January; 5 (52) 24. Wickham CA, Carbone ET. Who’s calling for weight loss? A systematic review of mobile phone weight loss programs for adolescents. Nutr Rev. 2015 June; 73 (6): p. 386-398. 25. Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Krukowski R, Ells L, Harvey J, Morgan PJ, et al. eHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015 May; (16): p. 376-392. 26. Liu F, Kong X, Cao J, Chen S, Li C, Huang J, et al. Mobile Phone Intervention andWeight Loss Among Overweight and Obese Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Epidemiol. 2015 February; 181 (5): p. 337-348. 27. Bennett GG, Steinberg DM, Stoute C, Lanpher M, Lane I, Askew S, et al. Electronic health (eHealth) interventions for weight management among racial/ethnic minority adults: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2014 October; Supplement 4 (15): p. 146-158. 28. NIH (Instituto Nacional de la Diabetes y Enfermedades Digestivas y Renales). Medline Plus. [Online]; 2018 [cited 2018 May 22. Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/spanish/a1c.html. 29. Keys A, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura N, Taylor HL. Indices of relative weight and obesity. J Chronic Dis. 1972 July; 25 (6): p. 329-343. 30. Janalta Interactive. Techopedia [Online]. [Cited 2018 May] Available from: https://www.techopedia.com/. | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Download
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1