Comparative evaluation of three culture media for domestic cat in vitro embryo production and their effects on blastocyst development

dc.contributor.authorMunoz-Maceda, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCamacho, Eva Pericuesta
dc.contributor.authorPriego González, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorNúñez-Puente, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorde los Reyes, Nuria Martínez
dc.contributor.authorCerdeira Lozano, Joaquín Vicente
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Rodríguez, Ana
dc.contributor.authorRamos-Ibeas, Priscila
dc.contributor.authorRizos, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Adán, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorRoldan, Eduardo R.S.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Calabuig, María Jesús
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-30T13:48:07Z
dc.date.available2025-09-30T13:48:07Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.descriptionCredit authorship: contribution statement Ana Munoz-Maceda: Writing – original draft, Methodology. Eva Pericuesta Camacho: Supervision, Methodology. Andrea PriegoGonzalez: Writing – original draft, Methodology. Carolina Núnez- ˜ Puente: Methodology. Nuria Martínez de los Reyes: Methodology, Data curation. Joaquín Cerdeira: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Funding acquisition. Ana Sanchez-Rodriguez: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Priscila Ramos-Ibeas: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Dimitrios Rizos: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Alfonso Gutierrez-Ad ´ an: ´ Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Data curation, Conceptualization. Eduardo R.S. Roldan: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Investigation, Conceptualization. María Jesús Sanchez-Calabuig: ´ Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.
dc.description.abstractIn vitro embryo production (IVP) in felid species faces difficulties derived from their conservation status, challenging reproductive traits and low success rates during in vitro maturation (IVM), fertilization (IVF) and culture (IVC). This study aimed to evaluate different IVC strategies for domestic cat IVP, as a model to improve assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) in wild felids. Three IVC media were compared: (i) synthetic oviductal fluid (SOF) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (“FBS”); (ii): SOF supplemented first with bovine serum albumin (BSA), followed by FBS addition (“BSA-FBS”); and (iii): a commercial IVC human medium (IVC-CULT®) (“COM”). A total of 1064 in vitro matured cat oocytes were fertilized with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa, and 813 presumptive zygotes were cultured in the three experimental groups. Expanded blastocysts (n = 108) were snap-frozen or fixed for differential cell count and quantitative analysis of pluripotency-related gene expression. One-way ANOVA was used to assess differences in IVP rates and blastocyst developmental parameters. No significant differences in cleavage or blastocyst rates were found among groups, nor in total blastomere count (P > 0.05). However, the FBS group showed higher SOX2 pluripotency marker expression compared to the other groups, while BSA-FBS exhibited a more balanced SOX2/OCT4 ratio, linked to blastocyst competence in other species. Furthermore, a tendency was found towards a lower proportion of cells in the inner cell mass (ICM) in the FBS group. Our results suggest that elevated SOX2 expression alone may not reflect improved developmental competence in the domestic cat blastocysts. Instead, early BSA supplementation followed by FBS might enhance ICM differentiation, benefiting first from BSA's fatty acids and later from FBS's antioxidants and growth factors. Lastly, the commercial medium yielded comparable embryonic developmental outcomes to BSA-FBS, offering a viable alternative. Thus, this research represents a contribution to the refinement of IVP protocols in the domestic cat, promoting standardization that could be adapted for wild feline conservation
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Medicina y Cirugía Animal
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Fisiología
dc.description.facultyFac. de Veterinaria
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipComunidad de Madrid
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España)
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationMunoz-Maceda, A., Camacho, E. P., Priego-Gonzalez, A., Núñez-Puente, C., de los Reyes, N. M., Cerdeira, J., Sanchez-Rodriguez, A., Ramos-Ibeas, P., Rizos, D., Gutiérrez-Adán, A., Roldan, E. R. S., & Sánchez-Calabuig, M. J. (2026). Comparative evaluation of three culture media for domestic cat in vitro embryo production and their effects on blastocyst development. Theriogenology, 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2025.117641
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117641
dc.identifier.essn1879-3231
dc.identifier.issn0093-691X
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117641
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/124396
dc.issue.number117641
dc.journal.titleTheriogenology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final9
dc.page.initial1
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.projectIDPID2023-149027OB-I00
dc.relation.projectIDAEI/10.13039/501100011033/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu636.082.4
dc.subject.keywordBlastocyst
dc.subject.keywordIn vitro culture
dc.subject.keywordDomestic cat
dc.subject.keywordSOX2/OCT4
dc.subject.keywordInner cell mass
dc.subject.ucmProducción animal
dc.subject.unesco3104 Producción Animal
dc.titleComparative evaluation of three culture media for domestic cat in vitro embryo production and their effects on blastocyst development
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number249
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfe21ed36-288b-49a2-9697-141087c4aeb9
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf2e24e7d-23f0-47c9-9cc4-c761211b3659
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc56653da-79e5-4925-8688-dadb3c39f50e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8195e871-b27d-4b96-9db7-5076dfd60b94
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfe21ed36-288b-49a2-9697-141087c4aeb9

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparative evaluation.pdf
Size:
2.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections