Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a spherical and a toric trifocal intraocular lens

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPoyales Galán, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorGarzón Jiménez, Nuria
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T13:18:28Z
dc.date.available2023-06-17T13:18:28Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-27
dc.descriptionSubmitted: December 15, 2017|Final revision submitted: August 27, 2018|Accepted: September 27, 2018
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate visual outcomes and satisfaction after implantation of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): a spherical IOL and a toric IOL. Setting: IOA Madrid Innova Ocular, Madrid, Spain. Design: Prospective, controlled clinical trial. Methods: Patients (>50 years) were implanted bilaterally with either a trifocal spherical hydrophilic IOL (FineVision POD F) if corneal astigmatism was 1.0 diopter (D) or less, or with a trifocal toric hydrophilic IOL (FineVision POD FT) if astigmatism was more than 1.0 D. Outcomes analyzed 3 months after surgery included monocular and binocular visual acuities at distance, near, and intermediate, both uncorrected and corrected. Defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction were also assessed. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA) (P = .38), monocular corrected distance (CDVA) (P = .22), or distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA) (P = .95) visual acuities; however, the distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) was slightly better in the spherical IOL group (P = .008). The UDVA was 20/25 or better in 89% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 93% in the toric IOL group. The DCIVA was 20/32 or better in 92% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 93% in the toric IOL group at 80 cm (Radner Vissum chart), and 20/32 or better in 100% of eyes in both groups at 63 cm (Colenbrander chart). The DCNVA (Radner chart) was 20/32 or better in 89% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 90% of eyes in the toric IOL group. There was no difference between the groups in contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, cylinder, or satisfaction results. Conclusion: Patients had significant improvement in visual acuity and gained functional uncorrected visual acuity across all distances in both groups. Satisfaction was high with both IOLs.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Optometría y Visión
dc.description.facultyFac. de Óptica y Optometría
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statusinpress
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/50466
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.025
dc.identifier.issn1873-4502
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.025
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886335018308745?via%3Dihub
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/12955
dc.journal.titleJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial11 p.
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.subject.cdu617.7-089.243
dc.subject.cdu681.73
dc.subject.cdu617.751
dc.subject.keywordIntraocular lens
dc.subject.keywordtoric lens
dc.subject.keywordIOLs
dc.subject.keywordVisual outcomes
dc.subject.keywordVisual acuity
dc.subject.ucmLentes de contacto
dc.subject.ucmOptometría
dc.subject.ucmMateriales ópticos
dc.subject.unesco3311.11 Instrumentos ópticos
dc.subject.unesco2209.15 Optometría
dc.subject.unesco2209.14 Propiedad ópticas de los sólidos
dc.titleComparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a spherical and a toric trifocal intraocular lens
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
Download
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Garzón-galerada1.pdf
Size:
2.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download
Collections
Artículos