Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Not just emotion regulation, but cognition: An experience sampling study testing the relations of ecological interpretation biases and use of emotion regulation strategies with momentary affective states during daily life functioning

dc.contributor.authorBoemo Prieto, María Teresa
dc.contributor.authorMartín García, Óscar
dc.contributor.authorPacheco Romero, Ana Mar
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Martínez, Iván
dc.contributor.authorLafit, Ginette
dc.contributor.authorMyin Germeys, Inez
dc.contributor.authorSánchez López, Álvaro
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T11:47:06Z
dc.date.available2024-10-29T11:47:06Z
dc.date.issued2024-06
dc.description.abstractBackground Current research is moving from studying cognitive biases and maladaptive emotion regulation (ER) as relatively stable phenomena contributing to affective disturbances, adopting ecological methodologies, such as Experience Sampling Methods (ESM). However, there is still limited ESM evidence on the interactions between stress and ER strategies’ use, and negative interpretation biases, regarding their relations with momentary affective states. In this study, we used a new ESM design to disentangle the contextual, regulatory and cognitive processes implicated in daily affective experiences. Method A sample of 103 participants completed an ESM study (3 times a day for 10 days) that included self-reports of momentary affect, stress intensity, ER strategies’ use and a cognitive task measuring momentary negative interpretation biases. Results Multilevel analyses supported significant interactions of both rumination and worry with stress intensity, to account for momentary higher negative and lower positive affect levels. Furthermore, higher state negative interpretation bias levels uniquely predicted both higher negative and lower positive momentary affect levels. Conclusion This study implemented a novel online cognitive task within an ESM procedure, which helped to disentangle how contextual ER strategies’ use and momentary cognitive biases uniquely relate to affective experiences in daily life.
dc.description.abstractHighlights •We implemented a negative interpretation bias task in an ESM procedure. •Higher NA and lower PA were related to rumination use at higher stress. •Higher NA and lower PA were related to worry use at higher stress. •Stress intensity did not interact with reappraisal in relation with momentary affect. •Momentary interpretation bias was concurrently related with higher NA and lower PA.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Personalidad, Evaluación y Psicología Clínica
dc.description.facultyFac. de Psicología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España)
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationBoemo, T., Martín-Garcia, O., Pacheco-Romero, A. M., Blanco, I., Lafit, G., Myin-Germeys, I., & Sanchez-Lopez, A. (2024). Not just emotion regulation, but cognition: An experience sampling study testing the relations of ecological interpretation biases and use of emotion regulation strategies with momentary affective states during daily life functioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 177, 104550.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brat.2024.104550
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2024.104550
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000779
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/109683
dc.journal.titleBehaviour Research and Therapy
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial104550
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.projectIDPID2021-127480NB-I00
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu159.9.07
dc.subject.cdu159.91
dc.subject.cdu159.93
dc.subject.cdu159.97
dc.subject.keywordExperience sampling methods
dc.subject.keywordInterpretation bias
dc.subject.keywordEmotion regulation strategies
dc.subject.keywordStress intensity
dc.subject.keywordAffect
dc.subject.ucmPsicología (Psicología)
dc.subject.ucmPsicología clínica y psicodiagnóstico
dc.subject.unesco61 Psicología
dc.subject.unesco3201.05 Psicología Clínica
dc.titleNot just emotion regulation, but cognition: An experience sampling study testing the relations of ecological interpretation biases and use of emotion regulation strategies with momentary affective states during daily life functioning
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number177
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication41cbfa0f-7f7c-4e9d-ba19-a36613145f71
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc6bde3a8-641e-46dc-839b-7d9bb2db82f7
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf3e32346-3fd1-49d9-89bf-9e703e0ae920
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery41cbfa0f-7f7c-4e9d-ba19-a36613145f71

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Boemo et al 2024. Not just emotion, but cognition.pdf
Size:
2.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections