Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Ranking Leading Econometrics Journals Using Citations Data from ISI and RePEc

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorChang, Chia-Lin
dc.contributor.authorMcAleer, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-19T23:53:37Z
dc.date.available2023-06-19T23:53:37Z
dc.date.issued2013-10
dc.descriptionJEL Classifications: C18, C81, Y10. The authors are most grateful for very helpful discussions and correspondence with Esfandiar Maasoumi and Christian Zimmermann. For financial support, the first author wishes to thank the National Science Council, Taiwan, and the second author wishes to acknowledge the Australian Research Council and the National Science Council, Taiwan.
dc.description.abstractThe paper focuses on the robustness of rankings of academic journal quality and research impact of 10 leading econometrics journals taken from the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science (ISI) Category of Economics, using citations data from ISI and the highly accessible Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) database that is widely used in economics, finance and related disciplines. The journals are ranked using quantifiable static and dynamic Research Assessment Measures (RAMs), with 15 RAMs from ISI and 5 RAMs from RePEc. The similarities and differences in various RAMs, which are based on alternative weighted and unweighted transformations of citations, are highlighted to show which RAMs are able to provide informational value relative to others. The RAMs include the impact factor, mean citations and non-citations, journal policy, number of high quality papers, and journal influence and article influence. The paper highlight robust rankings based on the harmonic mean of the ranks of 20 RAMs, which in some cases are closely related. It is shown that emphasizing the most widely-used RAM, the 2-year impact factor of a journal, can lead to a distorted evaluation of journal quality, impact and influence relative to the harmonic mean of the ranks.
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
dc.description.facultyInstituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
dc.description.refereedFALSE
dc.description.statusunpub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/23260
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.ucm.es/icae
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/41517
dc.issue.number34
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.total24
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDocumentos de Trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 3.0 España
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
dc.subject.keywordResearch assessment measures
dc.subject.keywordcitations
dc.subject.keywordimpact
dc.subject.keywordinfluence
dc.subject.keywordharmonic mean
dc.subject.keywordrobust journal rankings
dc.subject.keywordeconometrics.
dc.subject.ucmEconometría (Economía)
dc.subject.ucmBibliometría
dc.subject.unesco5302 Econometría
dc.titleRanking Leading Econometrics Journals Using Citations Data from ISI and RePEc
dc.typetechnical report
dc.volume.number2013
dcterms.referencesBergstrom C. (2007), Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, C&RL News, 68, 314-316. Bergstrom, C.T. and. J.D. West (2008), Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor™ metrics, Neurology, 71, 1850–1851. Bergstrom, C.T., J.D. West and M.A. Wiseman (2008), The Eigenfactor™ metrics, Journal of Neuroscience, 28(45), 11433–11434 (November 5, 2008). Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2013a), Ranking journal quality by harmonic mean of ranks: An application to ISI Statistics & Probability, Statistica Neerlandica, 67(1), 27-53. Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2013b), What do experts know about forecasting journal quality? A comparison with ISI research impact in finance, Annals of Financial Economics, 8(1), 1-30. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and E. Maasoumi (2012), Robust ranking of journal quality: An application to economics, Emory Economics 1204, Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011a), What makes a great journal great in economics? The singer not the song, Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 326-361. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011b), What makes a great journal great in the sciences? Which came first, the chicken or the egg?, Scientometrics, 87(1), 17-40. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011c), Great expectatrics: Great papers, great journals, great econometrics, Econometric Reviews, 30(6), 583-619. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011d), How are journal impact, prestige and article influence related? An application to neuroscience, Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(11), 2563-2573. Hirsch, J.E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-15572 (November 15, 2005). ISI Web of Science (2011), Journal Citation Reports, Essential Science Indicators, Thomson Reuters ISI. Seglen, P.O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498-502. Zimmermann, C. (2012), Academic rankings with RePEc, Working Paper 2012-023A, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-023.pdf).
dspace.entity.typePublication

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1334.pdf
Size:
860.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
downoload Download

Collections

Documentos de trabajo e informes técnicos