Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Analizando el sesgo implícito de género en Óptica y Fotónica en la etapa predoctoral en España

dc.contributor.authorTomás, María Baralida
dc.contributor.authorde las Heras, Alba
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Beatriz Santamaría
dc.contributor.authorGómez Varela, Ana I.
dc.contributor.authorBenedi Garcia, Clara
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Pinar, Martina
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Fernández, Verónica
dc.contributor.authorPérez Herrera, Rosa Ana
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-08T15:30:42Z
dc.date.available2024-01-08T15:30:42Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-01
dc.description.abstractGender biases play a very significant role in areas related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The association of gender with certain attributes, behaviors or professions leads to a lower proportion of women in STEM. In the field of Optics and Photonics, we can identify a gender disparity between technical or bio-clinical approaches within the same area when examining the authorship of the defended thesis. In this work, we quantify the impact of implicit gender bias in the Ph.D. programs related to Optics and Photonics in Spain. Here we present an exhaustive study about the UNESCO descriptors of the theses defended within 2015-2020 through the open-access repository TESEO, where all the doctoral theses of Spanish universities are compiled. The doctorate program of each thesis is considered and classified into a technical or bio-clinical category. With this classification, we quantify the number of male and female authors within each category, and the results show up a clear unbalance in most of the evaluated descriptors: men are more likely to choose technical doctorate programs, while women are mostly present in clinical or biological programs. This difference is seen even in descriptors where both genders are equally represented. On one side, women’s underrepresentation is higher in “Physics”, “Astronomy and Astrophysics”, “Earth and Space Sciences”, and “Technological Sciences”. Oppositely, the areas of “Chemistry”, “Life Sciences”, and “Medical Sciences” show a greater gender-balanced distribution for most of the descriptors. © Sociedad Española de Óptica
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Óptica
dc.description.facultyFac. de Óptica y Optometría
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.doi10.7149/OPA.56.3.51155
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.7149/OPA.56.3.51155
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/91849
dc.issue.number3 art.51155
dc.journal.titleOptica pura y aplicada
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSociedad Española de Óptica
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu535
dc.subject.keywordgender bias; gender gap; optics and photonics; Ph.D. theses; women in science
dc.subject.ucmOptica (Medicina)
dc.subject.unesco2209 Óptica
dc.titleAnalizando el sesgo implícito de género en Óptica y Fotónica en la etapa predoctoral en España
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number56
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationaa913134-98ab-438d-b8ac-14620d5e3261
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaa913134-98ab-438d-b8ac-14620d5e3261

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
OPA.56.3.51155.pdf
Size:
2.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections