Estudio de los impactos ambientales de los cruces de gasoductos con ríos vadeables
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2004
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Asociación Ibérica de Limnología
Citation
Estudio de los impactos ambientales de los cruces de gasoductos con ríos vadeables | Asociación Ibérica de Limnología (AIL). https://www.limnetica.com/es/estudio-de-los-impactos-ambientales-de-los-cruces-de-gasoductos-con-r%C3%ADos-vadeables. Accedido 11 de septiembre de 2024.
Abstract
El río Cigüela y su afluente Valdepineda (Cuenca, España) fueron afectados por el cruce de un gasoducto, en Diciembre de 2001, mediante la técnica convencional “cruce subálveo” que consta de tres fases: instalación de la pista de trabajo, apertura de zanja y rehabilitación. Con el objetivo de evaluar el impacto de las distintas etapas de la obra en el medio acuático, se está llevando a cabo un estudio que se centra en el efecto de los sólidos en suspensión en las comunidades macrobentónicas e ícticas. Se presentan los resultados preliminares obtenidos en la fase de apertura de zanja, donde se observa un valor muy elevado de movilización de sólidos en suspensión (hasta 5000 mg/l), alcanzando las mayores concentraciones en los 100 primeros metros aguas abajo del punto de cruce. Estos sólidos en suspensión podrían ser la causa del aumento significativo de la sedimentación de las partículas de tamaño comprendido entre 50-250 µm y 250-500 µm en los 30 primeros metros aguas abajo del punto de cruce. Por otro lado, no se han observado diferencias en el valor del índice BMWP’en las distintas estaciones de muestreo. Sin embargo, en la fase de rehabilitación, se encuentra una diferencia significativa en la frecuencia de distribución de algunas de las especies de peces presentes en el río, además se observa un claro efecto barrera para la ictiofauna al eliminar la pista de trabajo.
The Cigüela River and its tributary, Valdepineda (Cuenca, España) were affected by the crossing of a natural gas pipeline, in December 2001, by means of the conventional technique “open-cut water crossing” that consists of three different works: installation of the right-of-way, excavation and backfill of the pipeline trench, and restoration. In order to assess the impacts of these different activities on the aquatic environment, we are carrying out a study that is focused on the effects of suspended solids in the benthic and fish communities. Preliminary results of this study are presented on the excavation and backfill of the pipeline trench, that indicate that a very high value of suspended solids mobilisation is observed (up to 5000 mg/l), reaching the higher concentrations in the first 100 meters downstream of the crossing site. These suspended solids might be responsible for the significant increase in the sedimentation of the particles of sizes 50-250 µm and 250-500 µm in the 30 first meters downstream of the crossing site. On the other hand, we have not found differences in the values of the BMWP’index at the different sampling sites. Nevertheless, in the restoration phase , there is a significant difference in the distribution frequency of some fish species that appear in the river and also a clear barrier effect is observed for fishes when eliminating the right-of-way.
The Cigüela River and its tributary, Valdepineda (Cuenca, España) were affected by the crossing of a natural gas pipeline, in December 2001, by means of the conventional technique “open-cut water crossing” that consists of three different works: installation of the right-of-way, excavation and backfill of the pipeline trench, and restoration. In order to assess the impacts of these different activities on the aquatic environment, we are carrying out a study that is focused on the effects of suspended solids in the benthic and fish communities. Preliminary results of this study are presented on the excavation and backfill of the pipeline trench, that indicate that a very high value of suspended solids mobilisation is observed (up to 5000 mg/l), reaching the higher concentrations in the first 100 meters downstream of the crossing site. These suspended solids might be responsible for the significant increase in the sedimentation of the particles of sizes 50-250 µm and 250-500 µm in the 30 first meters downstream of the crossing site. On the other hand, we have not found differences in the values of the BMWP’index at the different sampling sites. Nevertheless, in the restoration phase , there is a significant difference in the distribution frequency of some fish species that appear in the river and also a clear barrier effect is observed for fishes when eliminating the right-of-way.













